Abstract
We developed a computer-based technique to quantify optic nerve head pallor from videographically acquired digitized optic nerve images and tested the ability of pallor measurements to discriminate between normal eyes and eyes with early glaucoma. Corresponding pixel values from images obtained under 540 nm (green) and 640 nm (red) light with a videographic fundus camera were used to quantify optic nerve head pallor. A pallor density histogram was calculated for each eye, and contained values between 0 (red) to 1 (white). A measure of the distribution width of the histogram provided pallor measurements standardized to the measurements of the large veins of the disc. A database of one eye each of 44 normal controls and 70 patients with early open angle glaucoma was used to test the measurements for diagnotistic sensitivity and specificity. These standardized pallor measurements did not perform better than absolute pallor measurements to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes. The sensitivity and specificity of standardized pallor measurements (49% and 57%, respectively, for this database) were not as good as those for stereoscopic measurements of disc rim area in the same database (70% and 73%). Pallor measurements of this type do not appear to be sensitive or specific indicators of early glaucoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkowitz JS, Balter S (1970) Colorimetric measurements of the optic disc. Am J Ophthalmol 69:385–386
Boch RH (1950) Zur klinischen Messung der Papillenfarbe. Ophthalomologica 120:174–177
Caprioli J, Miller JM (1988) Videographic measurements of optic nerve topography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29:1294–1298
Davies EG (1970) Quantitative assessment of colour of the optic disc by a photographic method. Exp Eye Res 9:106–113
Flammer J, Drance SM, Augustiny L, Frankhauser A (1985) Quantification of visual field defects with automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:176–181
Gloster J (1967) Fundus oximetry. Exp Eye Res 6:187–212
Mikelberg FS, Douglas GR, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Wijsman K (1988) Reproducibility of computerized pallor measurements obtained with the Rodenstock Disk Analyzer. Graefe's Arch Clin Exo Ophthalmol 226:269–272
Miller J, Caprioli J (1988) Videographic quantification of optic disc pallor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29:320–323
Nagin P, Schwartz B (1985) Detection of increased pallor over time. Ophthalmology 92:252–261
Nagin P, Schwartz B, Nanba K (1985) The reproducibility of computerized boundary analysis for measuring optic disc pallor in the normal optic disc. Ophthalmology 92:243–251
Pederson JE, Anderson DR (1980) The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 98:490
Prescott P, Hogg RV (1977) Trimmed and outer means and their variances. Am Stat 31:156–157
Robert Y, Maurer W (1984) Pallor of the optic disc in glaucoma patients with artificial hypertension. Doc Ophthalmol 57:203–214
Rosenthal AR, Falconer DG, Barret P (1980) Digital measurement of pallor-disc ratio. Arch Ophthalmol 98:2027–2031
Schwartz B (1980) Optic disc changes in ocular hypertension. Surv Ophthalmol 25:148–154
Schwartz B, Kern J (1977) Scanning microdensitometry of optic disc pallor in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 95:2159–2165
Schwartz B, Reinstein NM, Lieberman DM (1973) Pallor of the optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol 89:278–286
Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumenee AE (1979) Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous visual field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol 97:1444–1448
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by grants from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, The Connecticut Lions Eye Research Foundation, and Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; the authors have no proprietary interest in the instruments or software described within
Correspondence to: J. Caprioli
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Assad, A., Caprioli, J. Digital image analysis of optic nerve head pallor as a diagnostic test for early glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230, 432–436 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175928
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175928