Skip to main content
Log in

Amend the old or address the new: Broad-based legislation when proposing policies is costly

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If each legislator wishes to encourage other legislators to address new problems in future periods, then a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium can exist with the following properties: (1) no legislator finds it worthwhile to make a narrow proposal that appeals to a minimum majority; (2) instead, legislators propose policies that appeal to all members, not for fear of retaliation, but rather to encourage other members to work on new problems in succeeding periods; (3) in succeeding periods no legislator amends the existing broad policy. We find an equilibrium with these properties in finite as well as infinite period games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aranson, P.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1985). Public interest, private interest, and the democratic polity. In R. Benjamin and S. Elkin (Eds.), The democratic state, 87–178. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1963). Social choice and individual values, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P. (1989). A noncooperative theory of legislative coalitions. American Journal of Political Science 33(4): 1048–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. and Ferejohn, J. (1987). The power to propose. Research Paper No. 954. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

  • Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(3): 371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. and Fiorina, M. (1987). The personal vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (1979). Cyclic sets in multidimensional voting models. Journal of Economic Theory 20(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1986). Game theory with applications to economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A. and McMillan, H. (1990). Optimal coalition size when making proposals is costly. Social Choice and Welfare 7(4): 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. (1984). The general irrelevance of the zero sum assumption in the legislative context. In M. Holler (Ed.), Coalitions and collective action, 99–112. Würzburg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. (1990). The power of the proposal maker in a model of endogenous agenda formation. Public Choice 64(1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, J. (1984). To serve the people: Congress and constitutency service. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. (1974). Public policies for private profits: Urban government. In H. Hochman (Ed.), Redistribution through public choice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. (1979). General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models. Econometrica 47(5): 1085–1112.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. (1978). Voting by veto. Journal of Public Economics 10(1): 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. and Weingast, B. (1981). Political preferences for the pork barrel: A generalization. American Journal of Political Science 25(1): 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1981). Why so much stability? Public Choice 37: 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. (1979). A rational choice perspective on congressional norms. American Journal of Political Science 23: 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We gratefully acknowledge the comments of anonymous referees, Peter Aranson, Nick Baigent, Linda Cohen, Tyler Cowen, Bernard Grofman, Robin Keller, and Neal Stoughton. The Securities and Exchange Commission, as a matter of policy, disclaims responsibility for any private publication or statement by any of its employees. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission or McMillan's colleagues on the Staff of the Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazer, A., McMillan, H. Amend the old or address the new: Broad-based legislation when proposing policies is costly. Public Choice 74, 43–58 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175210

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175210

Keywords

Navigation