Skip to main content
Log in

Why do winners keep winning?

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Winners of aggressive interactions often continue to win in future encounters. I propose that this phenomenon is a by-product of two other phenomena occurring simultaneously: first, initiators of aggressive interactions typically win those interactions and, second, winners of aggressive encounters often become more likely to initiate future interactions. I propose that these phenomena can be explained, in turn, by selection favoring an individual's initiating an interaction only when it is likely to win that interaction. I found support for this two-step explanation for the winning begets winning phenomenon by observing aggressive interactions among captive dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis oreganus). First, initiators of interactions almost always won. Second, based on characteristics of winners in birds' home aviaries, I could predict which birds would initiate against novel competitors — winners were long-winged males with dark hoods, and birds with these characteristics were more likely to be the first to initiate in novel triads. In addition, aggression was directed preferentially towards other dark-hooded males. The results of this study may expand our understanding of the dynamics of aggressive interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balph MH (1977) Winter social behaviour of dark-eyed juncos: communication, social organization, and ecological implications. Anim Behav 25:859–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M, Scott AC (1989) Aggression, dominance and social organization in evening grosbeaks. Ethology 83:177–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton D, Brain PF (1979) Behavioural comparisons of isolated, dominant and subordinate mice. Behav Proc 4:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase ID (1980) Social process and hierarchy formation in animal societies. Am Soc Rev 45:905–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Collias NC (1943) Statistical analysis of factors which make for success in initial encounters between hens. Am Nat 77:519–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RC (1983) Experiential effects on agonistic behaviour in the paradise fish, Macropodus opercularis. Behaviour 85:292–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S, Jackson WM (1990) Univariate metrics are not adequate for measuring avian body size. Auk 107:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg B, Allee WC (1942) Some effects of conditioning on social dominance and subordination in inbred strains of mice. Physiol Zool 15:485–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Holberton RL, Able KP, Wingfield JC (1989) Status signalling in dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis: plumage manipulations and hormonal correlates of dominance. Anim Behav 37:681–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford TR, White C, Kelsey JL (1978) Multivariate analysis for matched case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 107:245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson WM (1988) Can individual differences in history of dominance explain the development of linear dominance hierarchies? Ethology 79:71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn MW (1951) The effect of severe defeat at various age levels on the aggressive behavior of mice. J Genet Psychol 79:117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson ED (1979) Aggressive behavior in wintering dark-eyed juncos: determinants of dominance and their possible relation to geographic variation in sex ratio. Wilson Bull 91:371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh T (1958) Social behavior of the American buffalo (Bison bison bison). Zoologica 43:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Meese GB, Ewbank R (1973) The establishment and nature of the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig. Anim Behav 21:326–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsell Color, Inc (1976) Munsell book of color. Kollmorgen, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Poll NE van de, Dejonge F, Oyen HG van, Pett J van (1982) Aggressive behaviour in rats: Effects of winning and losing on subsequent aggressive interactions. Behav Proc 7:143–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp JW (1988) Effects of experience on agonistic behavior among goldfinches. Behav Proc 16:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner SC (1961) Effect of learning to be submissive on status in the peck order of domestic fowl. Anim Behav 9:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt V, Reinhardt A (1975) Dynamics of social hierarchy in a dairy herd. Z Tierpsychol 38:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S (1985) Dyed birds achieve higher social status than controls in Harris' sparrows. Anim Behav 33:1325–1331

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution 35:441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell T (1966) Hierarchy in the organization of a captive baboon group. Anim Behav 14:430–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouless CR, Guinness FE (1986) Conflict between red deer hinds: the winner always wins. Anim Behav 34:1166–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler SJ (1972) The behaviour and social organisation of New Forest ponies. Anim Behav Monogr 5:87–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker Leonard J (1979) A strategy approach to the study of primate dominance behavior. Behav Proc 4:155–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1989) SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, W.M. Why do winners keep winning?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28, 271–276 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175100

Keywords

Navigation