Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging areas and foraging behavior in the notch-eared bat, Myotis emarginatus (Vespertilionidae)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Field observations in a maternity colony of Myotis emarginatus (Vespertilionidae) were made during the summers of 1986 and 1987 in southern Germany. The nursery colony consisted of about 90 adult and 30 juvenile bats which roosted in a dimly lit and relatively cool church attic. Telemetry data from six adult M. emarginatus disclosed that some individuals also use secondary day roosts in trees or small buildings located close to their foraging areas. During the night, radiotagged individuals spent most of the time on the wing in forested areas (Fig. 2). Stationary bouts lasted no longer than 63 min. Individual bats returned to the same foraging areas on consecutive nights. All major foraging areas were situated in or at the fringes of forests, at distances as far as 10 km from the nursery roost. During commuting flights to the forests, M. emarginatus avoided open fields and preferred flight paths which offered cover such as orchards, hedges, overhanging foliage along creeks, etc. On the way to the forests, the bats started to forage within buildings, in open spaces where aggregations of insects were present, and around or within the foliage of various types of trees at the level of tree tops or the upper third of the foliage. At these transient foraging areas close to the maternity roost, M. emarginatus displayed flexible foraging strategies: (1) They gleaned prey (mainly flies and spiders) from the substrate, (2) seized insects in aerial pursuit, and (3) occasionally hovered in front of foliage and walls.

Our observations confirm the conclusion from morphometric data on the wings that M. emarginatus is a predominantly gleaning bat and contradict the suggestion that it makes only brief flights of short distances. On the contrary, our field data suggest that M. emarginatus spends most of the night on the wing and commutes over distances of at least 10 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlen I (1981) Identification of Scandinavian bats by their sonar sounds. Rapp 6 Swed Univ Agric Sci Dept Wildl Ecol, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge HDJN (1986) Manoeuvreability and ecological segregation in the little brown (Myotis lucifugus) and Yuma (M. yumanensis) bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Can J Zool 64:1878–1882

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge HDJN, Brigham RM (1988) Loadcarrying and manoeuvreability in an insectivorous bat: a test of the 5% “rule” of radio-telemetry. J Mammal 69:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge HDJN, Rautenbach IL (1987) Morphology, echolocation and resource partitioning in insectivorous bats. J Animal Ecol 56:763–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Audet D (1990) Foraging behavior and habitat use by a gleaning bat, Myotis myotis. J. Mammal 71:420–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauerova Z (1986) Contribution to the trophic bionomics of Myotis emarginatus. Folia Zoologica 35:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Calandra V (1986) A study model — the bat colony of Cefalu cathedral in Sicily. Myotis 23/24:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton MB, Bell GP (1979) Echolocation and feeding behaviour in four species of Myotis. Can J Zool 57:1271–1277

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley JS (1972) Phenetic relationships among bats of the genus Myotis. Syst Zool 21:31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaisler J (1971) Zur Ökologie von Myotis emarginatus in Mittel-Europa. Decheniana-Beihefte 18:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer J, Schuller G, Neuweiler G (1984) Foraging behavior and Doppler shift compensation in echolocating hipposiderid bats, Hipposideros bicolor and Hipposideros speoris. J Comp Physiol 155:559–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinicke W, Krauß A (1978) Zum Beutespektrum des Braunen Langohrs, Plecotus auritus. Nyctalus 1:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Rayner JMV (1988) Flight performance, foraging tactics and echolocation in free-living Daubenton's hats, Myotis daubentoni. J Zool 215:113–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Rayner JMV (1989) Foraging behavior and echolocation of wild horseshoe bats Rhinolophus ferrumequinum and Rhinolophus hipposideros (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Issel W, Issel B (1953) Zur Verbreitung und Lebensweise der gewimperten Fledermaus, Myotis emarginatus. Säugetierkundl Mitt 1:145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • König C, Epple A (1957) Die Wimperfledermaus, Myotis emarginatus (Geoffroy, 1806) auch in der Pfalz. Säugetierkundl Mitt 5:123–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LA, Degn HJ (1981) The acoustic behavior of four species of Vespertilionid bats studied in the field. J Comp Physiol 142:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G (1984) Foraging, echolocation and audition in bats. Naturwissenschaften 71:446–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G (1990) Auditory adaptations for prey capture in echolocating bats. Physiol Rev 70:615–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Fenton MB (1988) Behaviour and foraging ecology of echolocating bats. In: Nachtigall P (ed) Animal sonar: processes and performances. pp 535–549

  • Norberg UM, Rayner JMV (1987) Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos Trans Soc Lond [Biol] 316:355–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm ES (1965) Zur Ökologie von Myotis mystacinus (Leisl.) und M. daubentoni (Leisl.) (Chiroptera). Ann Zool Fenn 2:77–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Racey PA, Swift SM (1985) Feeding ecology of Pipistrellus pipistrellus during pregnancy and lactation. I. Foraging behavior. J Anim Ecol 54:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Richarz K (1986) Bedrohung und Schutz der Gebäudefledermäuse. Schriftreihe Bayer Landesamt für Umweltschutz, nr. 73:15–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Richarz K, Krull D, Schumm A (1989) Quartieransprüche und Quartierverhalten einer mitteleuropäischen Wochenstubenkolonie von Myotis emarginatus (Geoffroy 1806) im Rosenheimer Becken, Oberbayern, mit Hinweisen zu den derzeit bekannten Wochenstubenquartieren dieser Art in der BRD. Myotis 27:111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert K (1987) Wissenschaftliche Ländeskunde, vol 2, Bayern: eine Landeskunde aus sozialgeographischer Sicht. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J (1986) Feeding territoriality in female Northern bats, Eptesicus nilssoni. Ethology 72:329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbings RE, Griffith F (1986) Distribution and status of bats in Europe. Natural Environment Research Council Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntington

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle MD (1974) An improved trap for bats. J Mammal 55:475–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler B, Neuweiler G (1983) Echolocation in noctule (Nyctalus noctula) and horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). J Comp Physiol 152:421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Weid R (1988) Bestimmungshilfe für das Erkennen europäischer Fledermäuse — insbesondere anhand der Ortungsrufe. Beiträge zum Artenschutz 5. Wirbeltiere. Schriftenreihe des Bayerischen Landesamtes für Umweltschutz, nr. 81:63–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: D. Krull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krull, D., Schumm, A., Metzner, W. et al. Foraging areas and foraging behavior in the notch-eared bat, Myotis emarginatus (Vespertilionidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28, 247–253 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175097

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175097

Keywords

Navigation