Skip to main content
Log in

Abdominal wall defects in the era of prenatal diagnosis

  • Main Topic
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the effects of prenatal diagnosis, we reviewed all 141 cases of abdominal wall defects (AWD) seen in our institution since 1980. In the period up to the end of 1994, 65 AWDs were diagnosed at the Department of Obstetric Ultrasound and another 76 infants were born with an AWD, 44 with omphalocele (prenatal diagnosis 29), 21 with a cord hernia (prenatal diagnosis 4), and 76 with gastroschisis (prenatal diagnosis 32). In the prenatal diagnosis group the frequency of cesarean section was 48%, in the postnatal diagnosis group 13%. In the omphalocele group, the pregnancy was terminated in 12 cases and there were 10 intrauterine deaths. A further 10 babies died in the first days of life, so that only 12 came to operation; 6 survived. At least 27 of the 44 infants had other severe anomalies. Omphalocele has a poor prognosis that is not improved by prenatal diagnosis, so that termination is a reasonable option. In the cord hernia group 1 patient died because of a cardiac anomaly; all the others had primary closure without complications. In the gastroschisis group, the pregnancy was terminated in 7 cases and there were 2 intrauterine and 2 neonatal deaths. Sixty-five infants were operated upon immediately after birth, 50 (77%) with primary closure and 15 in two stages. Four died after primary closure (8%) and 4 after a silastic silo (27%). The overall mortality was 12.3%. Postoperative intestinal morbidity was assessed by the period until total enteral nutrition could be established, which was from 8 to 185 days (median 17 days). The unfavorable prognostic factors were intestinal thickening and staged closure. Neither prenatal diagnosis nor mode of delivery could be shown to have any effect on mortality or morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bethel CAI, Seashore JH, Touloukian RJ (1989) Cesarean section does not improve outcome in gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 24: 1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bond SJ, Harrison MR, Filly A, Callen PW, Anderson RA, Golbus MS (1988) Severity of intestinal damage in gastroschisis: correlation with prenatal sonographic findings. J Pediatr Surg 23: 520–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eurenius K, Axelsson O (1994) Outcome for fetuses with abdominal wall defects detected by routine second trimester ultrasound. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73: 25–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Langer JC, Bell JG, Castillo RO, Crobleholme TM, Longaker MT, Duncan BW, Bradley SM, Finkbeiner WE, Verrier ED, Harrison MR (1990) Etiology of intestinal damage in gastroschisis, II. Timing and reversibility of histological changes, mucosal function and contractility. J Pediatr Surg 25: 1122–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Langer JC, Khanna J, Caco C, Dykes EH, Nicolaides KH (1993) Prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis: development of objective sonographic criteria for predicting outcome. Obstet Gynecol 81: 53–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Langer JC (1993) Fetal abdominal wall defects. Seminars Pediatr Surg 2: 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lenke RR, Persutte WH, Nemes J (1990) Ultrasonographic assessment of intestinal damage in fetuses with gastroschisis: is it of clinical value? Am J Obstet Gynecol 163: 995–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lenke RR, Hatch EI (1986) Fetal gastroschisis: a preliminary report advocating the use of cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 67: 395–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore T (1992) The role of labor in gastroschisis bowel thickening and prevention by elective pre-term and pre-labor cesarean section. Pediatr Surg Int 7: 256–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olsen L, Ewald U, Meurling S (1992) Gastroschisis: primary closure is possible in most newborns. Pediatr Surg Int 7: 431–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sapin E, Lewin F, Baron JM, Bargy F, Wakim A, Helardot PG (1993) Prenatal diagnosis and management of gastroschisis. Pediatr Surg Int 8: 31–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw A (1975) The myth of gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 10: 235–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sipes SL, Weiner CP, Sipes DR, Grant SS, Williamson RA (1990) Gastroschisis and omphalocele: does either antenatal diagnosis or route of delivery make a difference in perinatal outcome? Obstet Gynecol 76: 195–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tibboel D, Raine P, McNee M, Azmy A, Klück P, Young D, Molenaar JC (1986) Developmental aspects of gastroschisis. Pediatr Surg 21: 865–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Towne BH, Peters G, Chang JHT (1980) The problem of “giant omphalocele”. J Pediatr Surg 15: 543–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, O.H., Kvist, N. & Brocks, V. Abdominal wall defects in the era of prenatal diagnosis. Pediatr Surg Int 11, 4–7 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174575

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174575

Key words

Navigation