Skip to main content
Log in

Microsurgical intestinal anastomosis

A study of different suture materials and techniques in rats

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present investigation examined the morphological and functional effects of different microsurgical suture materials and techniques for intestinal anastomosis in 220 Sprague-Dawley rats. Extramucous end-on and inverted anastomoses were performed using non-absorbable monofilament 7-0, 8-0, and 10-0 (metric 0.2) nylon (Ethilon), absorbable braided 8-0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), and monofilament 10-0 Vicryl. Both suture materials were swaged onto taper-point needles. The efficacy of the anastomoses was evaluated by measurement of bursting strength, the healing by light microscopic and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination, and revascularization by perfusion of India ink into the aorta. Non-inverting, single-layer, extramucous end-on intestinal anastomoses performed with microsurgical technique and micromonofilament suture material gave excellent results without complications, a bursting pressure superior to the inverting technique, rapid revascularization, and per primam healing. Thicker sutures were less favorable. The highest bursting strength was obtained in anastomoses performed using 10-0 Vicryl and 10-0 Ethilon. Fine absorbable sutures are thus the optimal material for intestinal anastomoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allgöwer M, Hasse J, Herzog B (1971) Colonresektionen. Chirurg 42: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buchin R, Van Geertruyden J (1960) Valeur comparée des sutures intestinales en un plan et en deux plans: Etude expérimentale et clinique. Acta Chir Belg 59: 461–480

    Google Scholar 

  3. Craig PH, Williams JA, Davis KW, Magoun AD, Levy AJ, Bogdansky S, Jones JP Jr (1975) A biologic comparison of polyglactin 910 and polyglycolic acid synthetic absorbable sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE (1968) Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 126: 747–753

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gambee LP, Garnjobst W, Hardwick CE (1956) Ten years' experience with a single-layer anastomosis in colon surgery. Am J Surg 92: 222–227

    Google Scholar 

  6. Getzen LC, Holloway CK (1966) Comparative study of intestinal anastomotic healing in inverted and everted closures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 123: 1219–1227

    Google Scholar 

  7. Halsted WS (1887) Circular suture of the intestine — an experimental study. Am J Med Sci. 94: 436

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hastings JC, Van Winkle W Jr, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W (1975) Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140: 701–707

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hell K, Allgöwer M (1976) Die Colonresektionen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herrmann JB, Woodward SC, Pulaski EJ (1964) Healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat. Surg Gynecol Obstet 119: 269–275

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hertzler JH, Tuttle WM (1952) Experimental method for an everting end-to-end anastomosis in the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Surg 65: 398–403

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herzog (1973) The one-layer and two-layer intestinal anastomosis in animal experiments. In: Rickham PP, Hecker WCh, Prévot J (eds) Progress in pediatric surgery, vol 5. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München Berlin Wien, pp 37–59

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herzog B (1974) Die Darmnaht. H. Huber, Bern Stuttgart Wien

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B (1978) Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 136: 587–599

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jourdan P (1955) A propos de la suture à plan unique des techniques digestives. Acta Clin Belg 54: 765–771

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kronenthal RL, Jones JP Jr (1978) Clinical evaluations of sizes 9–0 and 10–0 monofilament Vicryl (Polyglactin-910) synthetic absorbable sutures. Ethicon Inc, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lamesch A, Dociu N (1977) Die mikrochirurgische Darmnaht: Untersuchungen am Rattendarm. Z Kinderchir 21: 263–274

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lembert A (1826) Mémoire sur l'entérorrhaphie avec la description d'un procédé nouveau pour pratiquer cette opération. Rép Gén Anat Physiol Pathol 2: 100

    Google Scholar 

  19. Müller G, Kieninger G, Breucha G, Bustamante I, Neugebauer W (1978) Vergleichende Untersuchungen ein- und zweireihiger Anastomosen am Schweindedünndarm. Langenbecks Arch Chir 346: 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson TS, Anders CH (1966) Dynamic aspects of small intestinal rupture with special consideration of anastomotic strength. Arch Surg 93: 309–314

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nöthiger F, Ziegler WJ, Finger J, Kaufmann R (1980) Nahtmaterial in der Darmanastomose. Helv Chir Acta (Suppl) 14: 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peacock EE Jr, Van Winkle W Jr (1976) The biochemistry and the environment of wounds and their relation to wound strength. In: Peacock EE, Jr, Van Winkle W Jr (eds) Wound repair 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia London Toronto, pp 145–203

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ravitch MM, Canalis F, Weinshelbaum A (1967) Studies in intestinal healing. III. Studies on everting intestinal anastomoses. Ann Surg 166: 670–680

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sewell WR, Wiland J, Craver BN (1955) New method of comparing sutures of ovine catgut with sutures of bovine catgut in three species. Surg Gynecol Obstet 100: 483–494

    Google Scholar 

  25. Travers B (1812) An inquiry into the process of nature in repairing injuries of the intestine. Longman, London, p 132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: A. J. Lamesch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamesch, A.J., Dociu, N. Microsurgical intestinal anastomosis. Pediatr Surg Int 2, 33–41 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173603

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173603

Key words

Navigation