Abstract
The present investigation examined the morphological and functional effects of different microsurgical suture materials and techniques for intestinal anastomosis in 220 Sprague-Dawley rats. Extramucous end-on and inverted anastomoses were performed using non-absorbable monofilament 7-0, 8-0, and 10-0 (metric 0.2) nylon (Ethilon), absorbable braided 8-0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), and monofilament 10-0 Vicryl. Both suture materials were swaged onto taper-point needles. The efficacy of the anastomoses was evaluated by measurement of bursting strength, the healing by light microscopic and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination, and revascularization by perfusion of India ink into the aorta. Non-inverting, single-layer, extramucous end-on intestinal anastomoses performed with microsurgical technique and micromonofilament suture material gave excellent results without complications, a bursting pressure superior to the inverting technique, rapid revascularization, and per primam healing. Thicker sutures were less favorable. The highest bursting strength was obtained in anastomoses performed using 10-0 Vicryl and 10-0 Ethilon. Fine absorbable sutures are thus the optimal material for intestinal anastomoses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allgöwer M, Hasse J, Herzog B (1971) Colonresektionen. Chirurg 42: 1–10
Buchin R, Van Geertruyden J (1960) Valeur comparée des sutures intestinales en un plan et en deux plans: Etude expérimentale et clinique. Acta Chir Belg 59: 461–480
Craig PH, Williams JA, Davis KW, Magoun AD, Levy AJ, Bogdansky S, Jones JP Jr (1975) A biologic comparison of polyglactin 910 and polyglycolic acid synthetic absorbable sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141: 1–10
Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE (1968) Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 126: 747–753
Gambee LP, Garnjobst W, Hardwick CE (1956) Ten years' experience with a single-layer anastomosis in colon surgery. Am J Surg 92: 222–227
Getzen LC, Holloway CK (1966) Comparative study of intestinal anastomotic healing in inverted and everted closures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 123: 1219–1227
Halsted WS (1887) Circular suture of the intestine — an experimental study. Am J Med Sci. 94: 436
Hastings JC, Van Winkle W Jr, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W (1975) Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140: 701–707
Hell K, Allgöwer M (1976) Die Colonresektionen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Herrmann JB, Woodward SC, Pulaski EJ (1964) Healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat. Surg Gynecol Obstet 119: 269–275
Hertzler JH, Tuttle WM (1952) Experimental method for an everting end-to-end anastomosis in the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Surg 65: 398–403
Herzog (1973) The one-layer and two-layer intestinal anastomosis in animal experiments. In: Rickham PP, Hecker WCh, Prévot J (eds) Progress in pediatric surgery, vol 5. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München Berlin Wien, pp 37–59
Herzog B (1974) Die Darmnaht. H. Huber, Bern Stuttgart Wien
Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B (1978) Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 136: 587–599
Jourdan P (1955) A propos de la suture à plan unique des techniques digestives. Acta Clin Belg 54: 765–771
Kronenthal RL, Jones JP Jr (1978) Clinical evaluations of sizes 9–0 and 10–0 monofilament Vicryl (Polyglactin-910) synthetic absorbable sutures. Ethicon Inc, Hamburg
Lamesch A, Dociu N (1977) Die mikrochirurgische Darmnaht: Untersuchungen am Rattendarm. Z Kinderchir 21: 263–274
Lembert A (1826) Mémoire sur l'entérorrhaphie avec la description d'un procédé nouveau pour pratiquer cette opération. Rép Gén Anat Physiol Pathol 2: 100
Müller G, Kieninger G, Breucha G, Bustamante I, Neugebauer W (1978) Vergleichende Untersuchungen ein- und zweireihiger Anastomosen am Schweindedünndarm. Langenbecks Arch Chir 346: 37–45
Nelson TS, Anders CH (1966) Dynamic aspects of small intestinal rupture with special consideration of anastomotic strength. Arch Surg 93: 309–314
Nöthiger F, Ziegler WJ, Finger J, Kaufmann R (1980) Nahtmaterial in der Darmanastomose. Helv Chir Acta (Suppl) 14: 1–43
Peacock EE Jr, Van Winkle W Jr (1976) The biochemistry and the environment of wounds and their relation to wound strength. In: Peacock EE, Jr, Van Winkle W Jr (eds) Wound repair 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia London Toronto, pp 145–203
Ravitch MM, Canalis F, Weinshelbaum A (1967) Studies in intestinal healing. III. Studies on everting intestinal anastomoses. Ann Surg 166: 670–680
Sewell WR, Wiland J, Craver BN (1955) New method of comparing sutures of ovine catgut with sutures of bovine catgut in three species. Surg Gynecol Obstet 100: 483–494
Travers B (1812) An inquiry into the process of nature in repairing injuries of the intestine. Longman, London, p 132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Offprint requests to: A. J. Lamesch
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamesch, A.J., Dociu, N. Microsurgical intestinal anastomosis. Pediatr Surg Int 2, 33–41 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173603
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173603