Skip to main content
Log in

Transportation in suburbia: Trends in attitudes, behaviors and policy preferences in Orange County, California

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes transportation attitudes, behaviors and policy preferences in a suburban region. The focus of the study is Orange County, which has experienced rapid growth and industrialization in recent decades. The results from the 1989 Orange County Annual Survey indicate that most residents perceive traffic to be the most serious problem facing the area, and most residents are dissatisfied with the current freeways. Over time, the trend is increased perceptions of traffic problems, However, there is little evidence that residents have changed their driving habits in recent years and there is considerable opposition to new transportation taxes and policies aimed at reducing traffic congestion. These trends are related to opposition to change by affluent suburban residents and to distrust of local government. Traffic attitudes and conservativism appear to play a minor role in predicting current driving habits and policy preferences. The results have important implications for future efforts to improve suburban traffic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldassare M (1981) The Growth Dilemma: Residents Views and Local Population Change in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986) Trouble in Paradise: The Suburban Transformation in America. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989) Citizen support for regional government in the new suburbia. Urban Affairs Quarterly 24: 460–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990) Suburban support for no-growth policies: Implications for the growth revolt. Journal of Urban Affairs 12:197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare M & Katz C (1987a) Disurbia emerges as the successor to suburbia. Newsday, Viewpoints Section, August 14.

  • — & — (1987b) Orange County Annual Survey. University of California, Irvine, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare M & Katz C (1989) Orange County Annual Survey. University of California, Irvine, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford H (1985) The First Suburbs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess E (1925) The growth of the city. In: Park RE, Burgess EW & McKenzie RD (eds) The City (pp 47–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark T & Ferguson L (1983) City Money. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • County of Orange (1985) Orange County Preferred Projections, mimeo.

  • Danielson M (1976) The Politics of Exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowall D (1984) The Suburban Squeeze. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley R (1976) Components of suburban population growth. In: Schwartz B (ed) The Changing Face of the Suburbs (pp 3–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer C (1984) The Urban Experience. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman R (1987) Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J (1985) Crabgrass Frontier. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda J (1978) Urbanization, community and the metropolitan problem. In: Street D (ed) Handbook of Contemporary Life (pp 27–57). San Francisco Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan J & Schneider M (1981) The stratification of metropolitan suburbs: 1950–1970. American Sociological Review 46:175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch H (1976) The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology 82: 309–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison P (1977) Migration and rights of access: New public concerns of the 1970s. Rand Series P-5785 (March).

  • Neiman M & Loveridge R (1981) Environmentalism and local growth control: A probe into the class bias thesis. Environment and Behavior 13:759–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarki A (1987) Commuting in America: A national report on commuting patterns and trends. Westport, CT: Eno Foundation, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troldahl V & Carter R (1964) Random selection of respondents within households in phone surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 1:1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer B (1975) The urban centrifugal drift. In: Hawley A & Rock V (ed) Metropolitan America in Contemporary Perspective (pp 23–92). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldassare, M. Transportation in suburbia: Trends in attitudes, behaviors and policy preferences in Orange County, California. Transportation 18, 207–222 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172936

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172936

Key words

Navigation