Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 339–343 | Cite as

Calling characteristics of parasitized and unparasitized populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus

  • Marlene Zukl
  • Leigh W. Simmons
  • Luanne Cupp
Article

Summary

Examination of three populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus revealed the presence of an acoustically-orienting parasitoid fly, Ormia ochracea (Tachinidae), in the population of crickets that has been introduced to the Hawaiian Islands. The cricket is native to Australia and the Pacific, and the fly is native to North America but has also been introduced to Hawaii. Up to 27% of males and 7% of females in Hawaii were infested with fly larvae. Song structure in the parasitized Hawaiian population was distinct from that of the other two groups, with the Hawaiian crickets showing several reduced song parameters. In addition, onset and cessation of calling at dusk and dawn were more abrupt in the Hawaiian population. These results are consistent with selective pressure from the phonotactic flies to decrease risky calling. Silent males were present in all three populations, suggesting that these noncallers may not represent a unique adaptation to the parasitoid.

Key words

Crickets Phonotactic parasitoids Calling characters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burk T (1982) Evolutionary significance of predation on sexually signalling males. Fl Entomol 65:90–104Google Scholar
  2. Cade W (1975) Acoustically orienting parasitoids: Fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science 190:1312–1313Google Scholar
  3. Cade W (1979) The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic, New York, pp 343–379Google Scholar
  4. Cade W (1981) Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets. Science 212:563–564Google Scholar
  5. Cade W (1984) Effects of fly parasitoids on nightly duration of calling in field crickets. Can J Zool 62:226–228Google Scholar
  6. Cade W, Wyatt DR (1984) Factors affecting calling behaviour in field crickets, Teleogryllus and Gryllus (age, weight, density, and parasites). Behaviour 88:61–75Google Scholar
  7. Hissman K (1990) Strategies of mate finding in the European field cricket (Gryllus campestris L.) at different population densities. Ecol Entomol 15:287–291Google Scholar
  8. Hoy RR, Pollack GS, Moiseff A (1982) Species-recognition in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: behavioral and neural mechanisms. Am Zool 22:597–607Google Scholar
  9. Otte D (1992) Evolution of cricket songs. J Orthop Res 1:25–49Google Scholar
  10. Otte D, Alexander RD (1983) The Australian crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) (Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia Monograph 22). Allen, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  11. Otte D, Rice R (in press) The Hawaiian crickets. Spec Publ Acad Nat Sci PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1979) Temporal pattern as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition in crickets. Science 204:429–432Google Scholar
  13. Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1981) Phonotaxis to individual rhythmic components of a complex cricket calling song. J Comp Physiol 144:367–373Google Scholar
  14. Pollack GS, Huber F, Weber T (1984) Frequency and temporal pattern-dependent phonotaxis of crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) during tethered flight and compensated walking. J Comp Physiol A 154:13–26Google Scholar
  15. Robert D, Amoroso J, Hoy RR (1992) The evolutionary convergence of hearing in a parasitoid fly and its cricket host. Science 258:1135–1137Google Scholar
  16. Ryan M (1985) The tungara frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Ryan MJ, Rand AS (1990) The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 44:305–314Google Scholar
  18. Sabrosky CW (1953a) Taxonomy and host relations of the tribe Ormiini in the western hemisphere. Proc Entomol Soc Washington 55:167–183Google Scholar
  19. Sabrosky CW (1953b) Taxonomy and host relations of the tribe Ormiini in the western hemisphere II. Proc Entomol Soc Washington 55:289–305Google Scholar
  20. Sakaluk SK (1990) Sexual selection and predation: balancing reproductive and survival needs. In: Evans DL, Schmidt JO (eds) Insect defenses. SUNY, New York, pp 63–90Google Scholar
  21. Simmons LW (1988) The calling song of the filed cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): constraints on transmission and its role in intermale competition and female choice. Anim Behav 36:380–394Google Scholar
  22. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1983) Using multivariate statistics. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Walker TJ (1975) Effects of temperature on rates in poikilotherm nervous systems: evidence from the calling songs of meadow katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Orchelimum) and reanalysis of published data. J Comp Physiol 101:57–69Google Scholar
  24. Walker TJ (1986) Monitoring the flights of field crickets (Gryllus sp.) and a tachinid fly (Euphasiopteryx ochracea) in north Florida. Fl Entomol 69:678–685Google Scholar
  25. Walker TJ (1993) Phonotaxis in female Ormia ochracea (Diptera: Tachinidae), a parasitoid of field crickets. J Insect Behav 6:389–410Google Scholar
  26. Walker TJ, Wineriter SA (1991) Hosts of a phonotactic parasitoid and levels of parasitism (Diptera: Tachinidae: Ormia ochracea). Fl Entomol 74:554–559Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlene Zukl
    • 1
  • Leigh W. Simmons
    • 2
  • Luanne Cupp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolU.K.

Personalised recommendations