Skip to main content
Log in

Work values as “reinforcer groupings”

Is the underlying structure method free?

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine whether the same underlying structure of occupational reinforcers (denoted the structure of work values) turns out when three different data analysis methods are used. A questionnaire requesting a respondent to indicate the importance of each of 21 occupational reinforcers was administered to 546 subjects, drawn so as to constitute a representative sample of the urban adult Jewish Israeli population.

Factor analysis, Guttman's smallest space analysis, and cluster analysis were each applied to the subjects' responses from the questionaires, essentially resulting in different work values structure. Comparisons were made and theoretical implications have been discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldenderfer, M.S. and Blashfield, R.K. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, A.J., Goodnight, J.H. and Sall, J.P. (1979). SAS User's Guide. Releigh: N.C.: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.M. and McClintock, C.G. (1967). Value: Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 18, 239–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, R.S. and Cornelius, E.T. (1980). Dimension of work outcomes: A multidimensional scaling approach. Personnel Psychology, 35 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M.L. (1983). Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizur, D. (1979). Assessing achievement motive of American and Israeli managers: Design and appliction of a three-facet measure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizur, D. (1984). Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, G.W. (1975). The manager and his values: An international perspective from the U.S., Japan, Korea, India and Australia. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In: P. Lazarsfeld (ed.), Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL,: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Pschometrika, 33, 469–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1982) Facet theory, smallest space analysis, and factor analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 491–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 33, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R.L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations, (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.O. and Mueller, C.W. (1981). Factor analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, (7th edn.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckhohn, C. (1952). Values and value orientations in the theory of action. In: T. Parsons and E.A. Hits (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action, (pp. 338–433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. and Guttman, L. (1985) A faceted cross-cultural analysis of some case social values. In D. Canter (Ed.). Facet Theory: Approaches to Social Research (pp. 205–221) N.Y.: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J.C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes Nonmetric Program Series. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Mathesis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In: M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1292–1350). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofquist, J.H. and Dawis, R.V. (1978). Values as second-order needs in the theory of work adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 12, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorr, M. (1983). Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P.V. and Laumann, E.O. (1978). The social structure of religious groups: A replication and methodological critique. In: S. Shye (ed.), Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Science (pp. 81–111). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounds, J.B. and Zevon, M.A. (1983). Multidimensional scaling research in vocational psychology. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 491–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Z. and Zevulun, E. (1979). On the use of facet analysis in organizational behavior research. Some conceptual considerations and an example. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W.H. and Posner, B.Z. (1982). Managerial Values and Expectations: A Silent Power in Personal and Organizational Life. New York: Amacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, S.S., Reynolds, M.L. and Young, F.W. (1981). Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tziner, A. and Rimmer, A. (1984). Examination of an extension of Guttman's model of ability tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 59–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tziner, A., Elizur, D. Work values as “reinforcer groupings”. Qual Quant 21, 377–392 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172564

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172564

Keywords

Navigation