Skip to main content
Log in

Preclinical antitumor activity of a soluble etoposide analog, BMY-40481-30

  • Preclinical Studies
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

BMY-40481-30 is a new, water-soluble derivative and probable prodrug of etoposide characterized by the presence of a phosphate group in position 4′ of the E ring of the etoposide molecule. The compound was only weakly cytotoxic in vitro and, consequently, an investigation of its antitumor activity was conducted in several murine and human tumor (xenograft) models. Etoposide was administered ip or po whereas BMY-40481-30 was given ip, po or iv. The potency of the derivative, when administered parenterally, as defined on the basis of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), was less than the parent compound on a weight (mg/kg) basis in some experiments but comparable to etoposide in other instances. Comparison at the MTD of the two compounds showed that BMY-40481-30 administered ip was as active as etoposide against ip P388 leukemia. BMY-40481-30 given iv was more active than etoposide given ip in two of five experiments versus iv P388 leukemia, but the two compounds were comparably active in the other three studies. Of particular interest was the finding that the derivative was more active than the parent compound at many of the comparable (on a mg/kg basis) dose levels of both evaluated po versus iv P388 leukemia; MTD levels were not achieved, and hence not compared, for either compound using the po route of administration. Both etoposide and BMY-40481-30 yielded comparable maximum effects against ic P388 leukemia, ic L1210 leukemia, and sc B16 melanoma, but etoposide was more efficacious versus sc M5076 sarcoma. In addition to murine tumors, the HCT-116 human colon carcinoma was tested in a subrenal capsule model in athymic (nude) mice; both compounds demonstrated similar tumor inhibitory effects. Lastly, the human lung carcinomas, LX-1 and H2981, implanted sc into nude mice, showed either equivalent sensitivity to etoposide and BMY-40481-30, or a slightly enhanced sensitivity to the parent compound, in several experiments performed. BMY-40481-30 is a novel derivative and probable prodrug of etoposide with excellent solubility in water and antitumor activity generally comparable to that of the parent compound as demonstrated in several preclinical models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rose WC, Bradner WT: In vivo experimental antitumor activity of etoposide. In: Issell BF, Muggia FM, Carter SK (eds) Etoposide (VP-16): Current Status and New Developments. Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1984, pp 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  2. Issell BF, Rudolph AR, Louie AC: Etoposide (VP-16–213): an overview. In: Issell BF, Muggia FM, Carter SK (eds) Etoposide (VP-16): Current Status and New Developments. Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1984, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. O'Dwyer PJ, Leyland-Jones B, Alonso MT, Mansoni S, Wittes RE: Etoposide (VP-16–213): Current status of an active anticancer drug. New England J Med 312: 692–700, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  4. Catino JJ, Francher DM, Edinger KJ, Stringfellow DA: A microtitre cytotoxicity assay useful for the discovery of fermentation-derived antitumor agents. Cancer Chemotherap Pharmacol 15: 240–243, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rose WC: Evaluation of Platinol analogs using the M5076 murine sarcoma. Anticancer Res 6: 557–562, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rose WC, Schurig JE, Huftalen JB, Bradner WT: Experimental antitumor activity and toxicity of a new chemotherapeutic agent, BBM 928A. Cancer Res 43: 1504–1510, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gehan GA: A generalized Wilcoxan test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 52: 203–233, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bogden AE, Kelton DE, Cobb WR, Esber HJ: A rapid screening method for testing chemotherapeutic agents against human tumor xenografts. In: Houchens DP, Ovejera AA (eds) Proceedings of the Symposium on the Use of Athymic (Nude) Mice in Cancer Research. Gustav Fischer, Inc., New York, 1978, pp 231–250

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Barnett MJ, Smythe MM, Ang LM, Johnston A, Wrigley PFM: The pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide (VP-16–213) (Abstr) Proc Amer Assoc Clin Oncol 3: 24, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seeber S, Osieka R, Schmidt CG, Achterrath W, Crooke ST: In vivo resistance towards anthracyclines, etoposide, and cis-diammine dichloroplatinum (II). Canc Res 42: 4719–4725, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee T, Roberts D: Uptake as a determinant of resistance to teniposide (VM-26) (Abstr) Fed Proc 42: 768, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  12. Basler GA, Schurig JE, Crosswell AR: Xenograft models for testing VP-16 analogs against VP-16 resistant and sensitive human colon tumor cell lines (Abstr) Proc Amer Assoc Canc Res 29: 496, 1988

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, W.C., Basler, G.A., Trail, P.A. et al. Preclinical antitumor activity of a soluble etoposide analog, BMY-40481-30. Invest New Drugs 8 (Suppl 1), S25–S32 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171981

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171981

Key words

Navigation