Abstract
In this paper we define the relative deprivation of a person with income y as an increasing function of the percentage of individuals in the person's reference group whose income is larger than y. We obtain his satisfaction by adding up the marginal utilities of income over the range of income a person possesses. We model migration from one reference group to another as a response to relative deprivation and satisfaction: We say that a strong incentive to migrate exists if relative deprivation decreases while satisfaction rises with migration and that a weak incentive exists if the individual increases or decreases his satisfaction and deprivation at the same time by migrating. We derive conditions under which different incentives, weak or strong, hold for different individuals. We obtain the result that in general the richest individual in a society will not have a strong incentive to migrate but may have a weak incentive to migrate, whereas the poorest individual may have a strong incentive to migrate and also a weak incentive to migrate. Our analysis enables us to explain several perplexing migratory phenomena, identify income inequality as a distinct explanatory variable of migration and establish an incentive to migrate in situations where the utility-social welfare approach does not.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crosby F (1979) Relative deprivation revisited: A response to Miller, Bolce, and Halligan. Am Polit Sci Rev 73 (1):103–112
Frank RH (1984) Are workers paid their marginal products? Am Econ Rev 74(4):549–571
Frank RH (1985) The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Am Econ Rev 75(1):101–115
Merton RK, Kitt AS (1950) Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In: Merton KK, Lazarsfeld PF (eds) Contributions in social research, studies in the scope and method of The American Soldier. The Free Press, Glencoe, IL, pp 40–105
Runciman WE (1966) Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Shorrocks AF (1983) Ranking income distributions. Economica 50, 197:3–17
Stark O (1984a) Rural-to-urban migration in LDCs: A relative deprivation approach. Econ Dev Cult Change 32:475–486
Stark O (1984b) Discontinuity and the theory of international migration. Kyklos 37:206–222
Stouffer SA, Suchman EA, DeVinney LC, Star SA, Williams RM Jr (1949) The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Yitzhaki S (1979) Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient. Qu J Econ 93:321–324
Yitzhaki S (1982) Relative deprivation and economic welfare. Eur Econ Rev 17:99–113
Yitzhaki S (1983) On an extension of the Gini inequality index. Int Econ Rev 24:617–628
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This is a revised version of Harvard University Migration and Development Program, Discussion Paper No. 20. We are indebted to an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stark, O., Yitzhaki, S. Labour migration as a response to relative deprivation. J Popul Econ 1, 57–70 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171510
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171510