Skip to main content
Log in

Interspecific aggression in colonies of the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus sublaevis

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colonies of the slave-making ant, Harpagoxenus sublaevis, may simultaneously contain workers of several Leptothorax slave species. We observed aggressive interactions among slave-makers, between slavemakers and slaves, and among slaves in 11 mixed colonies. The first two types of aggression appear to be correlated with reproductive competition for the production of males. Aggressive interactions among slaves, however, occurred mainly between slaves belonging to different species. In two colonies, in which one slave species clearly outnumbered the other, the majority attacked and finally expelled all nestmates belonging to the minority species. Our observations thus suggest that in Harpagoxenus colonies a homogeneous “colony odor” is not always achieved and that heterospecific slaves may occasionally be mistaken for alien ants. Gas chromatographic analyses of ants from mixed colonies similarly show that cuticular hydrocarbon profiles may differ strongly between heterospecific nestmate slaves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Clément J-L, Lange C (1989) The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in recognition of larvae by workers of the ant Camponotus vagus: changes in the chemical signature in response to social environment (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 16:49–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1988) Dominance orders, worker reproduction, and queen-worker conflict in the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus sublaevis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:323–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckle GR, Greenberg L (1981) Nestmate recognition in sweat bees (Lasioglossum zephyrum): does an individual recognize its own odour or only odours of its nestmates? Anim Behav 29:802–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A (1966) Untersuchungen an Harpagoxenus sublaevis Nyl. (Hym., Formicidae). I. Freilandbeobachtungen zu Verbreitung und Lebensweise. Insectes Soc 13:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A (1974) Experimente und Beobachtungen zur Gründung and Entwicklung neuer Sozietäten der sklavenhaltenden Ameise Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.). Insectes Soc 21:381–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A, Alloway TM (1978) Caste polymorphism in Harpagoxenus canadensis M.R. Smith (Hym., Formicidae). Insectes Soc 25:339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A, Winter U (1978) Echte Arbeiterinnen, fertile Arbeiterinnen and sterile Wirtsweibchen in Völkern der dulotischen Ameise Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.) (Hym., Form.). Insectes Soc 25:63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A, Ehrhardt W, Winter U (1980) The organization of slave raids in dulotic ants — a comparative study (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Z Tierpsychol 53:245–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A, Ehrhardt W, Fischer K, Ofer J (1988) The slavemaking ant genus Chalepoxenus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). I. Review of literature, range, slave species. Zool Jb Syst 115:383–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin NF (1989) Discrimination between and within colonies of social insects: two null hypotheses. Neth J Zool 39:86–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin NF, Hölldobler B (1983) Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants. Science 222:1027–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin NF, Hölldobler B, Gladstein DS (1987) The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.). III Withincolony discrimination. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Dix MW (1979) Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrzański J (1966)Contribution to the ethology of Leptothorax acervorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Biol Exper 26:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Errard C, Jaisson P (1991) Les premiéres étapes de la reconnaissance interspécifique chez les fourmis Manica rubida et Formica selysi (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) élevées en colonies mixtes. CR Acad Sci Paris Sér III 313:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Errard C, Bagnéres AG, Clément JL (1989) Les signaux chimiques de la reconnaissance interspécifique chez les fourmis. Actes Coll Insectes Soc 5, 285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielde AM (1903) Artificial mixed nests of ants. Biol Bull Mar Biol Lab Woods Hole 5:320–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks N, Blum M, Smith R-K, Allies AB (1990) Behavior and chemical disguise of cuckoo ant Leptothorax kutteri in relation to its host Leptothorax acervorum. J Chem Ecol 16:1431–1444

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodloe L, Sanwald R, Topoff H (1987) Host specificity in raiding behavior of the slave-making ant Polyergus lucidus. Psyche 94:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg L (1979) Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science 206:1095–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer C (1993) Cuticular spectra and inter-individual recognition in the slave-making ant Polyergus rufescens and the slave species Formica rufibarbis. Physiol Entomol 18:167–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer C, Bonavita-Cougourdan A (1993) Cuticular spectra in the slave-making ant Polyergus rufescens and the slave species Formica rufbarbis. Physiol Entomol 18:160–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J, Stuart RJ, Alloway TM, Buschinger A (1992) Host specificity in the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus canadensis M.R. Smith. Can J Zool 70:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1973) Zur Ethologie der chemischen Verständigung bei Ameisen. Nova Acta Leopold 37:259–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1977) Communication in social Hymenoptera. In: Sebeok TA (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 418–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Michener CD (1980) Mechanisms of identification and discrimination in social Hymenoptera. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests. Chemie, Weinheim, 35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung AC (1973) Reproductive biology in dulotic ants: preliminary report (Hymenoppera: Formicidae). Entomol News 84:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaisson P (1975) L'imprégnation dans l'ontogénése des comportements de soins aux cocons chez la jeune fourmi rousse (Formica polyctena Först.). Behaviour 52:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaib M, Brandl R, Bagine RKN (1991) Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles: A tool in termite taxonomy. Naturwissenschaften 78:176–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaib M, Heinze J, Ortius D (1993) Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of adults and pupae in the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus sublaevis and its hosts. Naturwissenschaften 80:281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Moli F, Mori A (1987) The problem of enslaved ant species: origin and behavior. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L (eds) From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 333–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel L, Vander Meer RK, Lavine BK (1988) Ontogeny of nestmate recognition cues in the red carpenter ant (Camponotus foridanus): behavioral and chemical evidence for the role of age and social experience. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowbahari E, Lenoir A, Clément JL, Lange C, Bagnéres AG, Joulie C (1990) Individual, geographical and experimental variation of cuticular hydrocarbons of the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): their use in nest and subspecies recognition. Biochem Syst Ecol 18:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Obin MS (1986) Nestmate recognition cues in laboratory and field colonies of Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Chem Ecol 12:1965–1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortius D (1992) Untersuchung zur sozialen Struktur unter den Sklaven in gemischten Kolonien von Harpagoxenus sublaevis. Unpublished Diploma-thesis, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1990) NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis systems. Exeter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (1984) Angewandte Statistik. 6th edn., Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann R, Buschinger A (1991) Selective acceptance of alien host species pupae by slaves of the dulotic ant, Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Ethology 88:154–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1987) Introduction to biostatistics. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart RJ (1988a) Development and evolution in the nestmate recognition systems of social insects. In: Greenberg G, Tobach E (eds) Evolution of social behavior and integrative levels Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 177–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart RJ (1988b) Collective cues as a basis for nestmate recognition in polygynous leptothoracine ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4572–4575

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart RJ (1992) Nestmate recognition and the ontogeny of acceptability in the ant, Leptothorax curvispinosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:403–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Vienne C, Errard C, Lenoir A (1992) Spatial organization & nestmate recognition in artifical mixed colonies of Manica rubida and Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 20:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1955) Division of labor in a nest of the slave-making ant Formica wheeleri Creighton. Psyche 62:130–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka R (1990) Chemical approach to understanding interactions among organisms. Physiol Ecol Jpn 27:31–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinze, J., Ortius, D., Kaib, M. et al. Interspecific aggression in colonies of the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus sublaevis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35, 75–83 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171496

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171496

Key words

Navigation