Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between ordinal measures and their underlying values: Why all the disagreement?

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abelson, R.P. and Tukey, J.W. (1963). “Efficient utilization of non-numerical information in quantitative analysis: general theory, the case of simple rank order”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34: 1347–1369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abelson, R.P. and Tukey, J.W. (1970). “Efficient conversion of nonmetric information into metric information”, pp. 407–417 in E.R. Tufte, ed., The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitkin, M.A. and Hume, N.W. (1966). “Correlation in a singly truncated bivariate normal distribution”. Biometrika 53: 278–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. and Barb, K.H. (1981). “Pearson's r and coarsely categorized measures”, American Sociological Review 46: 237–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatta, E.F. and Bohrnstedt, G.W. (1972). “How one normally constructs good measures”, Sociological Methods and Research 1: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatta, E.F. and Bohrnstedt, G.W. (1980). “Levels of measurement: once over again”, Sociological Methods and Research 9: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P. (1954). Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, R. (1975). “Part-whole correlations and the treatment of ordinal and quasi-interval data as interval data”, Pacific Sociological Review 18: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F. (1982). “Multivariate analysis of ordinal data”, American Sociological Review 47: 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensler, C. and Stipak, B. (1979). “Estimating interval scale values for survey response categories”, American Journal of Political Science 23: 627–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.R. and Creech, J.C. (1983). “Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: a simulation study of categorization error”, American Sociological Review 48: 398–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M.G. (1973). Rank Correlation Methods. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jae-On (1975). “Multivariate analysis of ordinal variables”, American Journal of Sociology 81: 261–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz, S. (1970). “The assignment of numbers of rank order categories”, American Sociological Review 36: 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz, S. (1971). “In defense of assigning numbers to ranks”, American Sociological Review 26: 521–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz, S. (1972). “Statistical usage in sociology: sacred cows and rituals”, Sociological Methods and Research 1: 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz, S. (1975). “Comments on Henkel's paper: The interplay between measurement and statistics”, Pacific Sociological Review 18: 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M. and Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, L.S. (1970). “Comments on ‘The assignment of numbers of rank order categories”, American Sociological Review 25: 916–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, L.S. (1971). “A note on treating ordinal data as interval data”, American Sociological Review 36: 519–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minium, E.W. (1979). Statistical Reasoning in Psychology and Education. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1979a). “On Kim's multivariate analysis of ordinal variables”, American Journal of Sociology 85: 668–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1979b). “The use of Pearson's r with ordinal data”, American Sociological Review 44: 851–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1981a). “Reducing grouping error”, American Journal of Political Science 25: 627–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1981b). “Using rank category variables to represent continuous variables: defects of common practice”, Social Forces 59: 1149–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1981c). “The effect of using ordinal data as interval: a synthesis of previous approaches”, paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, 1981.

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1982a). “The correlation between variate values and ranks in small size samples”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 35: 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1982b). “Using rank-order measures to represent continuous variables”, Social Forces 61: 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R.M. (1983). “Rank order versus rank category measures of continuous variables”, American Sociological Review 48: 284–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C.C. and Van Voorhis, W.R. (1940). Statistical Procedures and Their Mathematical Bases. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H.T. (1971). “Making causal inferences with ordinal data”, Institute for Research in Social Science, Chapel Hill, NC, Working Papers in Methodology, No. 5.

  • Reynolds, H.T. (1973). “On ‘The multivariate analysis of ordinal measures’”, American Journal of Sociology 78: 1513–1516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, S. and Schweitzer, D.G. (1971). “Comment on the Pearson r in random numbers and precise functional scale transformations”, American Sociological Review 36: 518–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.B. (1978). “Nonparametric path analysis: comment on Kim's ‘Multivariate analysis of ordinal variables’”, American Journal of Sociology 84: 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, A. (1954). “The correlation between variate-values and rank in samples from a continuous distribution”, British Journal of Statistical Psychology 7: 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, A. (1955). “The correlation between variate-values and ranks in samples from distributions having no variance”, British Journal of Statistical Psychology 8: 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, L.G. (1971). “Comment on ‘The assignment of numbers to rank order categories’”, American Sociological Review 36: 517–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T.P. (1971). “Critique of ordinal variables”, Social Forces 49: 432–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Oregon, 97403, Eugene, OR, U.S.A.

    Robert M. O'Brien

Authors
  1. Robert M. O'Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Brien, R.M. The relationship between ordinal measures and their underlying values: Why all the disagreement?. Qual Quant 19, 265–277 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170998

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170998

Keywords

Search

Navigation