Skip to main content
Log in

Competitor assessment by scent matching: an experimental test

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

If males assess potential opponents by comparing their odour with that of scent marks in the vicinity (the so called ‘scent matching’ hypothesis) they should be more reluctant to fight when these odours are the same. Under these circumstances the potential opponent is thus identified as a resource holder (a male monopolising a territory or group of females) that would escalate encounters to defend its resources. We tested this prediction by comparing the fighting behaviour of male house mice, Mus domesticus, when on a scent-marked substrate that matched the odour of an opponent with their behaviour on a substrate that did not match. As predicted, the delay before the first fight was longer and the rate of subsequent fighting lower when the scents matched. This result is consistent with the interpretation that resource holders scent mark to provide opponents with a means of competitor assessment and that they thus reduce the costs of resource defence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bronson FH (1976) Urine marking in mice: causes and effects. In: Doty RL (ed) Mammalian olfaction reproductive processes and behaviour. Academic Press, New York, pp 119–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RE (1985) The rodents II: suborder Myomorpha. In: Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals, vol 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 345–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowcroft P, Rowe FP (1963) Social organization and territorial behaviour in the wild house mouse (Mus musculus L.). Proc Zool Soc Lond 140:517–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins C, Maruniak JA, Bronson FH (1973) Social rank in house mice: differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns. Science 182:939–941

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S, Sandell M, Brinck C (1982) Scent marking and its territorial significance in stoats, Mustela erminea. Anim Behav 30:811–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullenkamp A, Fischer RB, Vance RA, Duffey KA (1985) The failure to demonstrate avoidance of ventral gland odors in male gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Physiol Behav 35:763–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist V (1965) On the rutting behaviour of the mountain goat. J Mammal 45:551–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM (1982) A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z Tierpsychol 2:89–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM (1985) The even-toed ungulates: order Artiodactyla. Sources, behavioural context and function of chemical signals. In: Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 550–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM (1990) Scent marking by resource holders: alternative mechanisms for advertising the costs of competition. In: Macdonald DW, Natynczuk S, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates V. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington JE (1976) Recognition of territorial boundaries by olfactory cues in mice (Mus musculus L.). Z Tierpsychol 41:295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger H (1944) Die Bedeutung von Miktion und Defäkation bei Wildtieren. Schweiz. A Psychol Anwend 3:170–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger H (1949) Säugetier-Territorien und ihre Markierung. Bijdr Dierkd 28:172–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst JL (1987) The functions of urine marking in a free-living population of house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty. Anim Behav 35:1433–1442

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst JL (1989) The complex network of olfactory communication in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty: urine marking and investigation within family groups. Anim Behav 37:705–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RP (1973) Scent marking in mammals. Anim Behav 21:521–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly A (1966) Lemur behaviour: a Madagascar field study. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RB, Nowell NW (1973) Aversive and aggression-promoting properties of urine from dominant and subordinate male mice. Anim Learn Behav 1:207–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RB, Nowell NW (1974) Effects of androgen on the aversive properties of male mouse urine. J Endocrinol 60:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimelman BR, Lubow RE (1974) The inhibitory effect of preexposed olfactory cues on intermale aggression in mice. Physiol Behav 12:919–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker WZ Jr (1976) Social behaviour and density regulation in house mice living in large enclosures. J Anim Ecol 45:677–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW (1985) The carnivores: order Carnivora. In: Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 619–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh JH (1973) Factors affecting the recognition of territory boundaries by mice (Mus musculus). Anim Behav 21:464–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature (London) 246:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykytowycz R (1965) Further observations on the territorial function and histology of the submandibular cutaneous (chin) glands in the rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L). Anim Behav 13:400–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykytowycz R (1973) Reproduction of mammals in relation to environmental odours. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 19:433–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykytowycz R (1975) Activation of territorial behaviour in the rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, by stimulation with its own chin gland secretion. In: Denton DA, Coghlan JP (eds) Olfaction and taste V. Academic Press, New York, pp 425–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RP, Mech LD (1975) Scent marking in wolves. Am Sci 63:628–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K (1971) Mammalian scent marking. Science 171:443–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer TF (1980) Androgen effects on responsiveness to aggression and stress-related odors of male mice. Physiol Behav 25:183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone RD, Gorman ML (1990) Mutual avoidance in moles, Talpa europaea. In: Macdonald DW, Natynczuk S, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates V. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)

    Chapter  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen D, Dawber M (1972) Territorial exclusion and reproductive isolation. Psychon Sci Sect Anim Physiol Psychol 28:159–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen D, Rice M (1976) Mammalian scent gland marking and social behavior. Psychol Bull 83:505–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll JV, Kriszat G (1934) Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Berlin. Cited in Hediger (1944)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: L.M. Gosling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gosling, L.M., McKay, H.V. Competitor assessment by scent matching: an experimental test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26, 415–420 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170899

Keywords

Navigation