Summary
If males assess potential opponents by comparing their odour with that of scent marks in the vicinity (the so called ‘scent matching’ hypothesis) they should be more reluctant to fight when these odours are the same. Under these circumstances the potential opponent is thus identified as a resource holder (a male monopolising a territory or group of females) that would escalate encounters to defend its resources. We tested this prediction by comparing the fighting behaviour of male house mice, Mus domesticus, when on a scent-marked substrate that matched the odour of an opponent with their behaviour on a substrate that did not match. As predicted, the delay before the first fight was longer and the rate of subsequent fighting lower when the scents matched. This result is consistent with the interpretation that resource holders scent mark to provide opponents with a means of competitor assessment and that they thus reduce the costs of resource defence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bronson FH (1976) Urine marking in mice: causes and effects. In: Doty RL (ed) Mammalian olfaction reproductive processes and behaviour. Academic Press, New York, pp 119–141
Brown RE (1985) The rodents II: suborder Myomorpha. In: Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals, vol 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 345–457
Crowcroft P, Rowe FP (1963) Social organization and territorial behaviour in the wild house mouse (Mus musculus L.). Proc Zool Soc Lond 140:517–531
Desjardins C, Maruniak JA, Bronson FH (1973) Social rank in house mice: differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns. Science 182:939–941
Erlinge S, Sandell M, Brinck C (1982) Scent marking and its territorial significance in stoats, Mustela erminea. Anim Behav 30:811–818
Fullenkamp A, Fischer RB, Vance RA, Duffey KA (1985) The failure to demonstrate avoidance of ventral gland odors in male gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Physiol Behav 35:763–765
Geist V (1965) On the rutting behaviour of the mountain goat. J Mammal 45:551–568
Gosling LM (1982) A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z Tierpsychol 2:89–118
Gosling LM (1985) The even-toed ungulates: order Artiodactyla. Sources, behavioural context and function of chemical signals. In: Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 550–618
Gosling LM (1990) Scent marking by resource holders: alternative mechanisms for advertising the costs of competition. In: Macdonald DW, Natynczuk S, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates V. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)
Harrington JE (1976) Recognition of territorial boundaries by olfactory cues in mice (Mus musculus L.). Z Tierpsychol 41:295–306
Hediger H (1944) Die Bedeutung von Miktion und Defäkation bei Wildtieren. Schweiz. A Psychol Anwend 3:170–182
Hediger H (1949) Säugetier-Territorien und ihre Markierung. Bijdr Dierkd 28:172–184
Hurst JL (1987) The functions of urine marking in a free-living population of house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty. Anim Behav 35:1433–1442
Hurst JL (1989) The complex network of olfactory communication in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty: urine marking and investigation within family groups. Anim Behav 37:705–725
Johnson RP (1973) Scent marking in mammals. Anim Behav 21:521–535
Jolly A (1966) Lemur behaviour: a Madagascar field study. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Jones RB, Nowell NW (1973) Aversive and aggression-promoting properties of urine from dominant and subordinate male mice. Anim Learn Behav 1:207–210
Jones RB, Nowell NW (1974) Effects of androgen on the aversive properties of male mouse urine. J Endocrinol 60:19–25
Kimelman BR, Lubow RE (1974) The inhibitory effect of preexposed olfactory cues on intermale aggression in mice. Physiol Behav 12:919–922
Lidicker WZ Jr (1976) Social behaviour and density regulation in house mice living in large enclosures. J Anim Ecol 45:677–697
Macdonald DW (1985) The carnivores: order Carnivora. In: Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 619–722
Mackintosh JH (1973) Factors affecting the recognition of territory boundaries by mice (Mus musculus). Anim Behav 21:464–470
Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175
Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature (London) 246:15–18
Mykytowycz R (1965) Further observations on the territorial function and histology of the submandibular cutaneous (chin) glands in the rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L). Anim Behav 13:400–412
Mykytowycz R (1973) Reproduction of mammals in relation to environmental odours. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 19:433–446
Mykytowycz R (1975) Activation of territorial behaviour in the rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, by stimulation with its own chin gland secretion. In: Denton DA, Coghlan JP (eds) Olfaction and taste V. Academic Press, New York, pp 425–432
Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243
Peters RP, Mech LD (1975) Scent marking in wolves. Am Sci 63:628–637
Ralls K (1971) Mammalian scent marking. Science 171:443–449
Sawyer TF (1980) Androgen effects on responsiveness to aggression and stress-related odors of male mice. Physiol Behav 25:183–187
Stone RD, Gorman ML (1990) Mutual avoidance in moles, Talpa europaea. In: Macdonald DW, Natynczuk S, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates V. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)
Thiessen D, Dawber M (1972) Territorial exclusion and reproductive isolation. Psychon Sci Sect Anim Physiol Psychol 28:159–160
Thiessen D, Rice M (1976) Mammalian scent gland marking and social behavior. Psychol Bull 83:505–539
Uexküll JV, Kriszat G (1934) Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Berlin. Cited in Hediger (1944)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Offprint requests to: L.M. Gosling
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gosling, L.M., McKay, H.V. Competitor assessment by scent matching: an experimental test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26, 415–420 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170899
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170899