Skip to main content
Log in

Natural versus haploscopic stereopsis

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural stereopsis is better with a large interpupillary distance (IPD). With haploscopic devices, depth perception is better with a small IPD. This apparently unknown fact has been trigonometrically calculated and experimentally shown by enlarging and diminishing the IPD in 20 subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frisby Stereotest: Manufacturer's instructions. Clement Clarke, International Ltd, London

  2. Hofmann FB (1970) Die Lehre vom Raumsinn des Auges. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (reprint from Graefe-Sämisch)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Lang J (1982) Zur Prüfung des Stereosehens am Polatest. In: Augenärztliche Fortbildung, Band 7, Teil 3. Urban und Schwarzenberg, München, pp 356–359

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lang J (1983) A new Stereotest. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 20:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lang J (1984) The two-pencil test and the new Lang Stereotest. Br Orthopt J 41:15–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lang, J., Rechichi, C. & Stürmer, J. Natural versus haploscopic stereopsis. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229, 115–118 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170541

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170541

Keywords

Navigation