Skip to main content
Log in

Procedures for controlling reference frame effects in the measurement of multidimensional processes

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

A wide array of perceptual mapping techniques have been developed which make it possible to describe the dissimilarities relations among datapoints as spatial arrays. While most of these present advantages and disadvantages for representing any single dataset, special difficulties arise when time-ordered data are available. These difficulties arise from the fact that the directional orientation of such techniques are (necessarily) arbitrary. When multiple datasets are scaled, therefore, the arbitrary orientations of each of the maps representing each of the time points render the description of motion and change difficult or impossible.

This problem can be solved by choosing a set of stable points within the process to serve as anchoring reference points for controlling the orientation of the individual “frames”. A worked through example is provided, in which the positions of the end points of the hands of a clock are mapped over ten intervals of time using conventional methods and the method proposed. Results indicate that a satisfactory choice of stable referent points, along with a suitable choice of rotation and translation rules, can overcome the original difficulty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, G. A. and J., Woelfel (1979). On the dimensionality of psychological processes, Quality and Quantity 13: 212–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence, Psychometrika 31: 33–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissetz, R., P., Schonemann, and J., Lingoes (1976). A solution to the weighted procrustes problem in which the transformation is in agreement with the loss function, Psychometrika 21: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and Method of Scaling, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, J. and E. L., Fink (1980). The Measurement of Communication Processes: Galileo Theory and Method, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, J., G. A., Barnett, R., Pruzek, and R., Zimmelman (1989). Rotation to simple processes: the effect of alternative rotation rules on observed patterns in time-ordered measurements, Quality and Quantity 23: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, J. and J., Danes (1980). Multidimensional scaling models for communication researcy, in P., Monge and J., Cappella (eds.), Multivariate Techniques in Human Communication Research, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, J. and G. A., Barnett (1982). Multidimensional scaling in Riemann space. Quality and Quantity 16: 469–491.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woelfel, J., Barnett, G.A. Procedures for controlling reference frame effects in the measurement of multidimensional processes. Qual Quant 26, 367–381 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170449

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170449

Keywords

Navigation