Summary
Monogamous female razorbills Alca torda actively sought extra-pair copulations (EPCs) in mating arenas outside their nesting colony. Females showed marked variation in promiscuity, defined as the number of EPCs they accepted (0–7), and in receptivity, defined as the percentage of EPC opportunities accepted (0%–100%). The opportunity of females to encounter males for EPCs was measured by (a) the time spent in the mating arena, and (b) the guarding effectiveness of their mates. Females appeared to encounter males and accept EPCs independently of opportunity, which suggests that variation in promiscuity and receptivity is caused by differences in the degree to which individual females might benefit from EPCs. I tested predictions of four hypotheses which propose benefits which females could obtain from EPCs: “good genes”, genetic diversity of offspring, insurance against infertility of mate, and acquisition of a new mate. No evidence was found to support two predictions made exclusively by the good genes hypothesis: (a) paired males did not achieve greater EPC success than unpaired males, and (b) males who were cuckolded did not obtain fewer EPCs than males whose mates avoided EPCs, suggesting that a male's attractiveness to other females does not ensure his own mate's fidelity. A prediction of both the insurance and good genes hypotheses was supported: females (who in this species retain their mates between years) showed similar receptivity to EPCs between years. This finding contradicts the genetic diversity hypothesis which predicts that in species that lay one egg per year, females who refuse EPCs in one year will accept them in the next. The good genes and genetic diversity hypotheses both predict that females who accept EPCs will behave as if to maximize their chances of being fertilized by extra-pair males. Results contradicted this prediction: females who accepted EPCs were more, rather than less receptive to their mates' copulation attempts than were females who did not accept EPCs. This finding is compatible with the insurance hypothesis which only requires females to store the sperm of extra-pair males, without necessarily being fertilized by it. Insurance against male infertility was the only hypothesis whose predictions were not contradicted by any of the results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birkhead TR (1988) Behavioural aspects of sperm competition in birds. Adv Study Behav 18:35–72
Birkhead TR, Johnson SD, Nettleship DN (1985) Extra-pair matings and mate-guarding in the common murre Uria aalge. Anim Behav 33:608–619
Birkhead TR, Atkin L, Moller AP (1987) Copulation behaviour of birds. Behaviour 101:101–138
Birkhead TR, Pellatt J, Hunter FM (1988) Extra-pair copulation and sperm competition in the zebra finch. Nature 334:60–62
Brown CR, Bomberger Brown M (1986) Ectoparasitism as a cost of coloniality in cliff swallows (Hirundo pyrrhonota). Ecology 67:1206–1218
Buitron D (1983) Extra-pair courtship in black-billed magpies. Anim Behav 31:211–220
Burke T, Davies NB, Bruford MW, Hatchwell BJ (1989) Parental care and mating behaviour of polyandrous dunnocks Prunella modularis related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 338:249–251
Colwell MA, Oring LW (1989) Extra-pair mating in the spotted sandpiper: a female mate acquisition tactic. Anim Behav 38:675–684
Frederick PC (1987) Extrapair copulations in the mating system of the white ibis (Eudocimus albus). Behaviour 100:170–201
Gibson RM, Jewell PA (1982) Semen quality, female choice and multiple mating in domestic sheep: a test of Trivers' sexual competence hypothesis. Behaviour 80:9–31
Gillespie JH (1977) Natural selection for variances in offspring numbers: a new evolutionary principle. Am Nat 111:1010–1014
Gladstone DE (1979) Promiscuity in monogamous colonial birds. Am Nat 114:545–557
Gowaty PA (1985) Multiple parentage and apparent monogamy in birds. In: Gowaty PA, Mock DW (eds) Avian Monogamy. (Ornithological Monographs, vol 37). American Ornithologist Union, Washington DC, pp 11–21
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I & II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Hamilton WD (1990) Mate choice near or far. Am Zool 30:341–352
Hatch SA (1987) Copulation and mate-guarding in the northern fulmar. Auk 104:450–461
Hatchwell BJ (1988) Intraspecific variation in extra-pair copulation and mate defence in common guillemots Uria aalge. Behaviour 107:157–185
Hoogland JL, Sherman PW (1976) Advantages and disadvantages of bank swallow (Riperia riperia) coloniality. Ecol Monogr 46:33–58
Johnston VH, Ryder JP (1987) Divorce in Larids: a review. Colonial Waterbirds 10:16–26
Lloyd CS (1979) Factors affecting breeding of razorbills Alca torda on Skokholm. Ibis 121:165–176
Martin PA, Reimers TJ, Lodge JR, Dzuik PJ (1974) The effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on the proportion of offspring. J Reprod Fertil 39:251–258
McKinney F, Cheng KM, Bruggers DJ (1984) Sperm competition in apparently monogamous birds. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 523–545
Møller AP (1987) Advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 35:819–832
Møller AP (1988a) Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332:640–642
Møller AP (1988b) Paternity and paternal care in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 36:996–1005
Parker GA (1984) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, London, pp 1–60
Smith SM (1988) Extra-pair copulations in black-capped chickadees: the role of the female. Behaviour 107:15–23
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine Press, Chicago, pp 136–179
Wagner RH (1991 a) The use of extra-pair copulations for mate appraisal by razorbills. Behav Ecol (in press)
Wagner RH (1991b) The role of extra-pair copulation in razorbill mating strategies. D. Phil thesis, University of Oxford
Wagner RH (1991 c) Evidence that female razorbills control extra-pair copulations. Behaviour (in press)
Wagner RH (1991 d) Pair-bond formation in the razorbill. Wilson Bulletin (in press)
Westneat DF, Sherman PW, Morton ML (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. In: Power DM (ed) Current Ortnithology, vol 7. Plenum Press, New York, pp 331–369
Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Wittenberger JF (1979) The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. In: Marler P, Vandenbergh J (eds)Handbook of behavioural neurobiology, vol 3: Social behaviour and communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp 271–349
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, R.H. The pursuit of extra-pair copulations by monogamous female razorbills: how do females benefit?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29, 455–464 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170176
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170176