Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does microbial biomass affect pelagic ecosystem efficiency? An experimental study

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacteria and other microorganisms in the pelagic zone participate in the recycling of organic matter and nutrients within the water column. The microbial loop is thought to enhance ecosystem efficiency through rapid recycling and reduced sinking rates, thus reducing the loss of nutrients contained in organisms remaining within the photic zone. We conducted experiments with lake communities in 5400-liter mesocosms, and measured the flux of materials and nutrients out of the water column. A factorial design manipulated 8 nutrient treatments: 4 phosphorus levels × 2 nitrogen levels. Total sedimentation rates were greatest in high-N mesocosms; within N-surplus communities, ⩾1 µM P resulted in 50% increase in total particulate losses. P additions without added N had small effects on nutrient losses from the photic zone; +2 µM P tanks received 334 mg P per tank, yet after 14 days lost only 69 mg more particulate-P than did control communities. Nutrient treatments resulted in marked differences in phytoplankton biomass (twofold N effect, fivefold P effect in +N mesocosms only), bacterioplankton densities (twofold N-effect, twofold P effects in -N and +N mesocosms), and the relative importance of autotrophic picoplankton (maximum in high NY mesocosms). Multiple regression analysis found that of 8 plankton and water chemistry variables, the ratio of autotrophic picoplankton to total phytoplankton (measured as chlorophyll α) explained the largest portion of the total variation in sedimentation loss rates (65% of P-flux, 57% of N-flux, 26% of total flux). In each case, systems with greater relative importance of autotrophic picoplankton had significantly reduced loss rates. In contrast, greater numbers of planktonic bacteria were associated with increased sedimentation rates and lower system efficiency. We suggest that different microbial components may have contrasting effects on the presumed enhanced efficiency provided by the microbial loop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Public Health Association (1985) Standard methods for the analysis of water and wastewater, 16th ed. APHA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen OK, Goldman JC, Caron DA, Dennett MR (1986) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain. III. Phosphorus dynamics. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 31:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  3. Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 10:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berman T (1985) Uptake of [32p]orthophosphate by algae and bacteria in Lake Kinneret. J Plankton Res 7:71–84

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berman T, Nawrocki M, Taylor GT, Karl DM (1987) Nutrient flux between bacteria, bacterivorous nanoplanktonic protists, and algae. Mar Microb Food Webs 2:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bloem J, Albert C, Bar-Gillisen M-JB, Berman T, Cappenberg TE (1989) Nutrient cycling through phytoplankton, bacteria, and protozoa in selectively filtered Lake Vechten water. J Plankton Res 11:119–131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bloesch J, Uehlinger U (1986) Horizontal sedimentation differences in a eutrophic Swiss lake. Limnol Oceanogr 31:1094–1109

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bloesch J, Bums NM (1980) A critical review of sediment trap technique. Schweiz Z Hydrol 42:15–55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bran+Luebbe Analyzing Technologies (1986) Orthophosphate in water and seawater. Industrial Method No. 812-86T

  10. Bran+Luebbe Analyzing Technologies (1986) Ammonia in water and seawater. Industrial Method No. 804-86T

  11. Bran+Luebbe Analyzing Technologies (1987) Nitrate/nitrite in water and seawater. Industrial Method No. 818-87T

  12. Bran+Luebbe Analyzing Technologies (1987) Silicates in water and wastewater. Industrial Method No. 785-86T

  13. Burns CW, Stockner JG (1991) Picoplankton in six New Zealand lakes: abundance in relation to season and trophic state. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 76:523–536

    Google Scholar 

  14. Caron D (1991) Evolving role of protozoa in aquatic nutrient cycles. In: Reid PC et al (eds) Protozoa and their role in marine processes. (NATO-ASI Series, vol G25) Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coveney MF, Wetzel RG (1992) Effects of nutrients on specific growth rate of bacterioplankton in oligotrophic lake water cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:150–156

    Google Scholar 

  16. Currie DJ, Bentzen E, Kalff J (1986) Does algal-bacterial phosphorus partitioning vary among lakes? A comparative study of orthophosphate uptake and alkaline phosphatase activity in freshwater. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dodds WK, Priscu JC, Ellis BK (1991) Seasonal uptake and regeneration of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in a large oligotrophic lake: size-fractionation and antibiotic treatment. J Plankton Res 13:1339–1358

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goldman JC (1984) Conceptual roles for microaggregates in pelagic waters. Bull Mar Sci 35:462–476

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glover HE (1985) The physiology and ecology of the marine cyanobacterial genus Synechococcus. Adv Aquat Microbiol 3:49–107

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hargrave BT, Burns NM (1979) Assessment of sediment trap collection efficiency. Limnol Oceanogr 24:1124–1136

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hessen DO, Andersen T (1992) The grazer-algae interface: feedback mechanisms linked to elemental ratios and nutrient cycling. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 35:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hobbie JE, Daley J, Jasper S (1977) Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hopcraft RR, Roff JC, Berges JA (1990) Size-fractionated sedimentation in a tropical neritic ecosystem near Kingston, Jamaica. Cont Shelf Res 10:795–806

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kirchner WB (1975) An evaluation of sediment trap methodology. Limnol Oceanogr 20:657–660

    Google Scholar 

  25. Le J, Wehr JD, Campbell L (1993) Uncoupling of inorganic nutrient-limited bacterioplankton growth from phytoplankton. Submitted to Appl Environ Microbiol

  26. Lewis MR, Warnock RE, Platt T (1986) Photosynthetic response of marine picoplankton at low photon flux. In: Platt T, Li WKW (eds) Photosynthetic picoplankton. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci 214:235–250

  27. Lorenzen CJ (1967) Determination of chlorophyll and pheo-pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol Oceanogr 12:343–346

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mazumder A, Taylor WD, McQueen DJ, Lean DRS (1989) Effects of fertilization and planktivorous fish on epilimnetic phosphorus and phosphorus sedimentation in large enclosures. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1735–1742

    Google Scholar 

  29. Menzel DW, Corwin N (1965) The measurement of total phosphorus in seawater based upon the liberation of organically bound fractions of persulfate oxidation. Limnol Oceanogr 10:280–282

    Google Scholar 

  30. Olsen Y, Jensen A, Reinertsen H, Bøtrsheim KY, Heldal M, Langeland A (1986) Dependence of the rate of release of phosphorus by zooplankton on the P:C ratio in the food supply, as calculated by a recycling model. Limnol Oceanogr 31:34–44

    Google Scholar 

  31. Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schindler DW (1977) Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195:260–262

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sherr EB, Sherr BF (1991) Planktonic microbes: tiny cells at the base of the ocean's food webs. Trends Ecol Evol 6:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sieburth JMcN, Smetacek V, Lenz J (1978) Pelagic ecosystem structure: heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1256–1263

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stockner JG, Antia NJ (1986) Algal picoplankton from marine and freshwater ecosystems: a multidisciplinary perspective. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:2472–2503

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stockner JG, Shortreed KS (1988) Response of Anabaena and Synechococcus to manipulation of nitrogen:phosphorus ratios in a lake fertilization experiment. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1348–1361

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stone L, Weisburd SJ (1992) Positive feedback in aquatic ecosytems. Trends Ecol Evol 7:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  38. Suttle CA, Harrison PJ (1988) Ammonium and phosphate uptake rates, N:P supply ratios, and evidence for N and P limitation in some oligotrophic lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 33:186–202

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thingstad TF (1987) Utilization of N, P, and organic C by heterotrophic bacteria. 1. Outline of a chemostat theory with a consistent concept of “maintenance” metabolism. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 35:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  40. Toolan T, Wehr JD, Findlay S (1991) Inorganic phosphorus stimulation of bacterioplankton production in a meso-eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2074–2078

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wehr JD (1989) Experimental tests of nutrient limitation in freshwater picoplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1605–1611

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wehr JD (1990) Predominance of picoplankton and nanoplankton in eutrophic Calder Lake. Hydrobiologia 203:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wehr JD (1991) Nutrient and grazer-mediated effects on picoplankton and size structure in phytoplankton communities. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 76:643–656

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wehr JD (1993) Effects of experimental manipulations of light and phosphorus supply on competition among picoplankton and nanoplankton in an oligotrophic lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:936–945

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wetzel RG (1983) Limnology. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wilkinson L (1988) SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Systat, Inc., Evanston, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Louis Calder Center, Fordham University, PO Box K, 10504, Armonk, NY, USA

    J.D. Wehr, J. Le & L. Campbell

Authors
  1. J.D. Wehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Correspondence to: J. D. Wehr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wehr, J., Le, J. & Campbell, L. Does microbial biomass affect pelagic ecosystem efficiency? An experimental study. Microb Ecol 27, 1–17 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170110

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170110

Keywords

Search

Navigation