Skip to main content
Log in

On the dimensionality of psychological processes

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In general, most of the techniques now in common use for the determination of the dimensionality of MDS spaces tend to under-estimate the number of dimensions needed to represent the underlying configuration accurately. This tendency is exaggerated when time-sequenced MDS observations are under study. Fortunately, econometric time-series (autocorrelation) procedures may prove helpful in resolving this problem [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, G.A. (1976). “The determinants of semantic organization of bilinguals,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association, Portland, Oregon, April.

  • Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M. (1970). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (ed.) (1966). Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H.S. and Jones, L.E. (1974). “The Effects of random error and subsampling of dimensions on recovery of configurations by nonmetric multidimensional scaling,” Psychometrika, 39: 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danes, J. and Woelfel, J. (1975). “An alternative to the ‘Traditional’ scaling paradigm in mass communication research: multidimensional reduction of ratio judgments of separation,” Paper presented before international Communication Association, Chicago, Illinois, April.

  • Gillham, J. and Woelfel, J. (1977). “The Galileo system of measurement: preliminary evidence for stability and equivalence to traditional measures,” Human Communication Research, 3: 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G.V., Wilson, V.L. and Gottman, J.M. (1975). Design and Analysis of Time-Series Experiments. Boulder: Colorado: Colorado Associated U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (1975). “On the robustness of multidimensional scaling techniques,” Journal of Marketing Research 12: 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, P.D. and Poor, D.D.S. (1974). “On the determination of appropriate dimensionality in data with error,” Psychometrika 39: 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.C. (1967). “Hierarchical clustering schemes,” Psychometrika 32: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.E. and Young, F.W. (1972). “Structure of a social environment: longitudinal individual differences scaling for an intact group,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24: 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D.A. (1969). “A Monte Carlo investigation of the statistical significance of Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure,” Psychometrika 34: 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. (1964a). “Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness to fit to a nonmetric hypothesis,” Psychometrika 29: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. (1964b). “Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method,” Psychometrika 29: 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R.L. (1968). “A Monte Carlo approach to the number of factors problem,” Psychometrika 33: 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel, B. (1969). Applied Linear Algebra. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serota, K.B. (1974). “Metric multidimensional scaling and communication: theory and implementation,” unpublished M.A. thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. (1966). “Metric structures in ordinal data,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3: 287–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. (1972). “Introduction to MDS workshop,” University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, June.

  • Shepard, R.N. (1974). “Representation of structures in similarity data: problems and prospects,” Psychometrika 39: 373–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenson, H.H. and Knoll, R.L. (1969). “Goodness of fit for random rankings in Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure,” Psychological Bulletin 71: 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, M.M. (1971). Multivariate Analysis Techniques for Education and Psychological Research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W.S. (1958). Theory and Methods of Scaling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, M. (1972). “Brief comments about dimensionality,” MDS workshop, University of Pennsylvania, June.

  • Woelfel, J., Saltiel, J., McPhee, R., Danes, J., Cody, M., Barnett, G. and Serota, K. (1975). “Orthogonal rotation to theoretical criteria: comparison of multidimensional spaces,” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Mathematical Psychology Group, Purdue, Indiana, August.

  • Young, F.W. (1970). “Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: recovery of metric information,” Psychometrika 35(4): 455–473.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnett, G.A., Woelfel, J. On the dimensionality of psychological processes. Qual Quant 13, 215–232 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170038

Keywords

Navigation