Skip to main content
Log in

Computerised tomography in the management of imperforate anus patients following rectoplasty

  • Main Topic
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighteen patients with surgically corrected high (supralevator) anorectal anomalies were scanned by computerised tomography (CT) to assess the state of development of the anorectal sphincter muscle complex (SMC) and the position of the neorectum in relation to the SMC. These CT findings were compared with the patients' assessed grade of faecal continence/incontinence. While continence levels did not always correlate closely with CT findings, the presence of a deficient SMC or an eccentric position of the neorectum within it, or both, was more frequent in patients with continence problems. For severe incontinence, CT scanning gave helpful indications for or against secondary rectoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson RE (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography — which one? Postgrad Med 85: 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Vries PA, Pena A (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 17: 638–643

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartl M (1972) A modified technique of gracilis plastie. Paediatr U Paedol [Suppl 2]: 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holschneider AM (1976) The problem of anorectal continence. Prog Pediatr Surg 9: 85–114

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ikawa H, Yokoyama J, Sanbonmatsu T, Hagane K, Endo M, Katsumata K, Kohda E (1985) The use of computerised tomography to evaluate anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 20: 640–644

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiesewetter WB (1967) Imperforate anus. II. The rationale and technique of the sacro-abdomino-perineal operation. J Pediatr Surg 2: 106

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kohda E, Fujioka M, Ikawa H, Yokoyama J (1985) Congenital anorectal anomaly: CT evaluation. Radiology 157: 349–352

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leighton DM, de Campo M (1989) CT invertograms. Pediatr Radiol 19: 176–178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leighton DM, de Campo M (1989) Uses of direct coronal pelvic CT. Australas Radiol 33: 157–159

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pickrell KL, Georziade N, Crawford H (1952) Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg 35: 853–862

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pringle KC, Sato Y, Soper RT (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to planning an anorectal pull-through. J Pediatr Surg 22: 571–574

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rehbein F (1959) Operation for anal and rectal atresia with rectourethral fistula. Chirurgie 30: 417

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schärli AF (1988) Analysis of anal incontinence. Prog Pediatr Surg 17: 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith ED (1988) In: Stephens FD, Smith ED, Paul NW (eds) Anorectal malformations in children: update 1988. Liss, New York, pp

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stephens FD, Smith ED (1971) anorectal malformations in children. Year Book Medical, Chicago, pp

  16. Stephens FD, Smith ED (1986) Classification, identification, and assessment of anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 1: 200–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: R. Fowler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ong, N.T., de Campo, M. & Rowler, R. Computerised tomography in the management of imperforate anus patients following rectoplasty. Pediatr Surg Int 5, 241–245 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169661

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169661

Key words

Navigation