Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term functional results after perineal surgery for low anorectal anomalies

  • Main Topic
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of a long-term follow-up review of anorectal anomalies treated at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, we examined 70 patients with translevator (low) anomalies treated by a perineal operation and assessed their anorectal function by four clinical scoring methods (Kelly, Templeton, Kiesewetter, and Wingspread). The results were compared qualitatively after conversion into three categories: “good”; “fair”; and “poor”. Over 90% of patients achieved socially acceptable anorectal control. The incidence of accidental defaecation was shown to be age-related, patients seen after 10 years of age having a lower incidence of soiling than younger children. The incidence of smearing or staining did not diminish with age. Prolonged management was required in 5 patients who continued to have a poor level of faecal continence. Anorectal function was not adversely affected by the anterior position of the anal orifice in most patients after simple perineal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burrington JD (1975) Rectovaginal separation operation after a “cutback” procedure for anorectal anomalies. Arch Surg 110: 471–475

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly JH (1972) The clinical and radiological assessment of anal continence in childhood. Aust NZ J Surg 42: 62–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kiesewetter WB, Chang JHT (1977) Imperforate anus: a five to thirty year follow-up perspective. Prog Pediatr Surg 10: 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kiesewetter WB, Turner CR (1963) Continence after surgery for imperforate anus: a critical analysis and preliminary experience with the sacroperineal pull-through. Ann Surg 158: 498–512

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nixon HH (1988) Operative management of low anomalies in the female. In: Stephens FD, Smith ED, Paul NW (eds) Anorectal malformations in children: update 1988. AR Liss, New York, pp 309–316

    Google Scholar 

  6. Partridge JP, Gough MH (1961) Congenital abnormalities of the anus and rectum. Br J Surg 49: 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raffensperger JG (1980) Swenson's pediatric surgery, 4th edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 556–561

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith EI, Tunnell WP, Williams GR (1978) A clinical evaluation of the surgical treatment of anorectal malformations (imperforate anus). Ann Surg 187: 583–592

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith EI, Gross RE (1978) Unpublished data quoted in Reference 12.

  10. Stephens FD, Smith ED (1971) Ano-rectal malformations in children. Year Book Medical Chicago, pp 65–66

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stephens FD, Smith ED (1986) Classification, identification, and assessment of surgical treatment of anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 1: 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  12. Templeton JM Jr, Ditesheim JA (1985) High imperforate anus —quantitative results of long-term fecal continence. J Pediatr Surg 20: 645–652

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: S. W. Beasley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ong, NT., Beasley, S.W. Long-term functional results after perineal surgery for low anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 5, 238–240 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169660

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169660

Key words

Navigation