Skip to main content
Log in

Conditioned tolerance to haloperidol- and droperidol-induced catalepsy

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The possible mechanisms of conditioned tolerance to the cataleptogenic effects of haloperidol and droperidol were studied in order to discriminate between “classical” and “conditioned” tolerance. Rats were conditioned by repeated administration (19–27 times) of haloperidol (1.5 mg/kg i. p.) or droperidol (1.5 mg/kg i. p.), respectively, in the presence of a sum of defined environmental (auditory, olfactory and tactile) stimuli. The animals were compared with pseudoconditioned rats, which underwent the same number of drug injections and exposures to the environmental stimuli, but neither were associated. In part of the experiments, one further group of rats was repeatedly treated with only solvent in the presence of the environmental stimuli. Rats conditioned with haloperidol or droperidol showed tolerance to the cataleptogenic effect of a test dose of haloperidol (1.5 mg/kg i. p.) or droperidol (1.5 mg/kg i.p.), respectively, when they were tested in presence of the defined conditioning stimuli. The rats conditioned with droperidol showed significantly less catalepsy than the pseudoconditioned animals 30 min after droperidol administration, whereas in rats conditioned with haloperidol, the catalepsy was less pronounced no sooner than 120 min after haloperidol administration. This was a manifestation of conditioned tolerance. In rats pseudoconditioned with droperidol, the catalepsy was similar to that produced by the drug in drug-naive rats, suggesting no classical tolerance due to repeated administration of the neuroleptic drug. The dopamine turnover in striatum or nucleus accumbens after administration of 1.5 mg/kg of haloperidol i.p. was not altered in rats conditioned with haloperidol when compared with pseudoconditioned animals. The stereotypies produced by apomorphine (0.16 mg/kg s. c.) were most pronounced in conditioned, less pronounced in pseudoconditioned and very small in drug-naive rats. These result suggest that the conditioned tolerance to the neuroleptic drugs is connected with an increased sensitivity of the basal ganglia to dopaminergic drugs. In another series of experiments, rats were conditioned with apomorphine 8 times and tested with 0.66 mg/kg of droperidol i.p. Rather unexpectedly, the catalepsy was significantly more pronounced in conditioned than in pseudoconditioned animals. This observation suggests that the type of conditioned effect, which becomes manifest, depends in part on the drug used in the presence of the conditioned stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andén N-E, Rubensson A, Fuxe K, Hökfelt T (1967) Evidence of dopamine receptor stimulation by apomorphine. J Pharm Pharmacol 19: 627–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Asper A, Bagglioni M, Bürki HR, Lauener H, Ruch W, Stille G (1973) Tolerance phenomena with neuroleptics catalepsy, apomorphine stereotypies and striatal dopamine metabolism in the rat after single and repeated administration of loxapine and haloperidol. Eur J Pharmacol 22:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson A (1975) Receptor-mediated control of dopamine metabolism. In: Usdin E, Bunney WE (eds)Pre- and postsynaptic receptors. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson A, Lindquist M (1963) Effect of chlorpromazine or haloperidol on formation of 3-methoxytryptamine and normetanephrine in mouse brain. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 20:140–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Costall B, Naylor RJ (1974) On catalepsy and catatonia and the predictability of the catalepsy test for neuroleptic activity. Psychopharmacology 34:233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf C, Korf J (1986) Conditional tolerance to haloperidol-induced catalepsy is not caused by striatal dopamine receptor supersensitivity. Psychopharmacology 90:54–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikelboom R, Stewart J (1982) Conditioning of drug-induced physiological responses. Psychol Rev 89:507–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst AM (1967) Mode of action of apomorphine and dexamphetamine in gnawing compulsion rats. Psychopharmacology 10:316–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Havemann U, Magnus B, Möller H-G, Kuschinsky K (1986) Individual and morphological differences in the behavioural responses to apomorphine in rats. Psychopharmacology 90:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PA, Niemegeers CJ, Schellekens KH (1965) Is it possible to predict the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs (major transquillizers) from animal data? Arzneimittelforschung (Drug Res) 15:104–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg T, Ungerstedt U (1976) Automatic registrations of behaviour related to dopamine and noradrenaline transmission. Eur J Pharmacol 36:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogilnicka E, Klimek V (1977) Drugs affecting dopamine neurons and yawning behaviour. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 7:303–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller H-G, Kuschinsky K (1986) Interactions of morphine with apomorphine: behavioural and biochemical studies. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 334:452–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller H-G, Nowak K, Kuschinsky K (1987) Conditioning of pre-and postsynaptic behavioural responses to the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine in rats. Psychopharmacology 91: 50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickolson VJ, van Riezen H, van Delft ML (1984) Response changes after repeated low apomorphine: dopamine autoreceptor desensitization or learning? Psychopharmacology 83:188–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulos CX, Hinson R (1982) Pavlovian conditional tolerance to haloperidol catalepsy: evidence of dynamic adaptation in the dopaminergic system. Science 218:491–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri SK, Lal H (1974) Tolerance to the behavioural and neurochemical effects of haloperidol and morphine in rats chronically treated with morphine or haloperidol. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 282:155–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanberg PR (1980) Haloperidol-induced catalepsy is mediated by postsynaptic dopamine receptors. Nature 284:472–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff SR (1982) Conditioned dopaminergic activity. Biol Psychiatry 17:135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Mac Rae J (1984) Environmental specificity of tolerance. Trends Neurosci 7:140–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarsy D, Baldessarini RJ (1973) Pharmacologically induced behavioural supersensitivity to apomorphine. Nature New Biol 245:262–263

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Send offprint requests to K. Kuschinsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nowak, K., Welsch-Kunze, S. & Kuschinsky, K. Conditioned tolerance to haloperidol- and droperidol-induced catalepsy. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 337, 385–391 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169528

Key words

Navigation