Advertisement

Erkenntnis

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 263–278 | Cite as

Possibilities and fallibilism

  • George N. Schlesinger
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. 1.
    K. G. Denbigh, An Inventive Universe, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. S.Carrier, ‘Scepticism Made Certain’, Journal of Philosophy 71 (1974), 144.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.Haack, ‘Fallibilism and Necessity’, Synthese 45 (1979), 37–64.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Since (p) ◊ Bp and (p) ◊ B ∼ p make precisely the same statement.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. L.Mott, ‘Haack on Fallibilism’, Analysis 40 (1980), 177–183.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.Haack, Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Lenzen, Epistemic Logic, Acta Philosophica Fennica 30 No. 1 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Teller, ‘Epistemic Possibility’, Philosophia 3 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • George N. Schlesinger
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations