Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical modelling and quantification of the autoinhibitory feedback control of noradrenaline release in brain slices

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Concentration-response curves, reflecting α2-autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of [3H]-noradrenaline release by exogenous noradrenaline in rat cerebral cortex and rabbit hippocampus slices, were analysed in order to test the usefulness of a mathematical model describing the relation between the independent variable, exogenous noradrenaline, and the dependent variable, inhibition of release. This model was based on the assumption of direct proportionality between receptor occupation and response, implying that there is correspondence between the shape of a concentration-binding curve and a concentration-response curve. The experimental concentration-response curves were obtained by different approaches: noradrenaline release from brain slices prelabelled with [3H]-noradrenaline was elicited electrically either by pseudo-one-pulse (POP) stimulation or by stimulation with 36 pulses applied with a frequency of 3 Hz. POP stimulation avoids autoinhibition by released noradrenaline and, therefore, was a suitable touchstone for the applied mathematical model which evaluates by nonlinear regression analysis two primary parameters: the dissociation constant between noradrenaline and the α2-adrenoceptor and the biophase concentration of noradrenaline which reflects the extent of autoinhibition and should be zero under POP conditions. In rat cerebral cortex tissue, the corresponding biophase concentration of endogenous noradrenaline was indeed estimated to be zero and the dissociation constant was K d = 10−7.62±0.14 mol/l. With 3 Hz stimulation, the biophase concentration was 10−7.80±0.05 mol/l, which has to be interpreted with respect to a simultaneously estimated K d of 10−7.63±0.12 mol/l. Since the K d-values under POP or 3 Hz conditions were similar, the biophase concentration obviously had no influence on the estimate of the other primary parameter, K d. With rabbit hippocampus, however, the main prerequisite of the mathematical model; i.e. direct proportionality between receptor occupation and response, was not established since the slope of the POP concentration-response curve (estimated as slope parameter c) did not correspond to that of a concentration-binding curve.

In conclusion, mathematical modelling by nonlinear regression analysis of the autoinhibitory circuit of noradrenaline release allows the estimation of a parameter c of this feedback regulation which supports or rejects the assumption of direct proportionality between receptor occupation and functional response. When the given requirement of direct proportionality is shown to hold, this analysis allows the feedback circuit to be described quantitatively in terms of the affinity of noradrenaline for, and of the biophase concentration of noradrenaline at, the presynaptic α2-adrenoceptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allgaier C, Agneter E, Feuerstein TJ, Singer EA (1992) Estimation of the biophase concentration of noradrenaline at presynaptic α2-adrenoceptors in brain slices. Naunyn-Schiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 345:402–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AJ (1937) General pharmacology. In: Heubner W, Schuller J (eds) Handbuch der Experimentellen Pharmakologie, vol IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 184–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein TJ, Hertting G, Lupp A, Neufang B (1986) False labelling of dopaminergic terminals in the rabbit caudate nucleus: uptake and release of [3H]-5-hydroxytryptamine. Br J Pharmacol 88:677–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein TJ, Bammert J, Meyer DK (1987a) Endogenous agonists may change the concentrationresponse curves of exogenous agonists: source of quantitative information about the endogenous tone. Biol Cybern 56:419–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein TJ, Lupp A, Hertting G (1987b) The serotonin (5-HT) autoreceptor in the rabbit hippocampus: role of 5-HT biophase concentration. Neuropharmacology 26:1071–1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein TJ, Bar KI, Lucking CH (1988) Activation of A1 adenosine receptors decreases the release of serotonin in the rabbit hippocampus, but not in the caudate nucleus. Naunyn-Schiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 338:664–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein TJ, Lupp A, Hertting G (1992a) Quantitative evaluation of the autoinhibitory feedback of release of 5-HT in the caudate nucleus of the rabbit where an endogenous tone on α2-adrenoceptors does not exist. Neuropharmacology 31:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein TJ, Lehmann J, Sauermann W, van Velthoven V, Jackisch R (1992b) The autoinhibitory feedback control of acetylcholine release from human neocortex tissue. Brain Res 572:64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer EA (1988) Transmitter release from brain slices elicited by single pulses: a powerful method to study presynaptic mechanisms. Trends Pharmacol Sci 9:274–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus OH, Goldstein A (1943) Zone behaviour of enzymes. J Gen Physiol 26:559–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Waud DR (1976) Analysis of dose-response relationships. In: Narahashi T, Bianchi CP (eds) Advances in general and cellular pharmacology, vol 1. Plenum, New York London, pp 145–178

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to T. J. Feuerstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feuerstein, T.J., Sauermann, W., Allgaier3, C. et al. Mathematical modelling and quantification of the autoinhibitory feedback control of noradrenaline release in brain slices. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 347, 171–179 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169263

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169263

Key words

Navigation