Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 415–420 | Cite as

Female choice of multiple male criteria in guppies: interacting effects of dominance, coloration and courtship

  • Astrid Kodric-Brown
Article

Summary

I experimentally examined the relative importance of social dominance, color patterns, and courtship behavior in male mating and reproductive success in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Female choice of males is based on a complex set of behavioral and morphological traits. The results of 59 paired-male one-female visual choice and mating trials showed that male mating success was positively correlated with dominance, courtship intensity, and male coloration. Only dominant males engaged in full copoulations, and they sired two-thirds of the broods. An analysis of the paternity of broods and results of mating trials showed that a female's visual response when the sexes are separated by a glass partition is a good predictor of a male's reproductive success when the partition is removed and they are allowed to mate. A canonical correlation analysis of male behavioral and morphological traits indicated that female visual response and male mating success were positively correlated with male courtship and with agonistic behavior. However, the relative importance of color varied. Carotenoid and iridescent spots were important both in attracting the female's attention and in enhancing male mating success. Melanins were not correlated with either mating success or female response. There was a relatively low correlation (48%) between male behavioral and morphological variables and female response variables (full copulation and female visual response). These results suggest that female choice is subtle, and is based on a complex suite of male behavioral and morphological traits as well as on competitive interactions among males.

Keywords

Carotenoid Morphological Trait Canonical Correlation Analysis Female Choice Courtship Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baerends GP, Brower R, Waterbolk HT (1955) Ethological studies on Lebistes reticulatus (Peters). Behaviour 8:249–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bischoff RJ, Gould JL, Rubenstein DI (1985) Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breden F, Stoner G (1987) Male predation risk determined female preference in the Trinidad guppy. Nature 329:831–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark E, Aronson LR (1951) Sexual behavior in the guppy Lebistes reticulatus. Zoologica 36:49–66Google Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Constantz GD (1975) Behavioral ecology of mating in the male gila topminnow, Poeciliopsis occidentalis (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Ecology 56:966–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crow RT, Liley NR (1979) A sexual pheromone in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters). Can J Zool 57:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evol Biol 11:319–364Google Scholar
  9. Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 9:173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1987) Predation, light intensity and courtship behavior in Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 35:1376–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farr JA (1976) Social facilitation of male sexual behavior, intrasexual competition, and sexual selection in the guppy. Evolution 30:707–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Farr JA (1980) Social behavior patterns as determinations of reproductive success in the guppy Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces, Poeciliidae). An experimental sutdy of the effects of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behaviour 74:38–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandolfi G (1971) Sexual selection in relation to the social status of males in Poecilia reticulata (Teleostei:Poeciliidae). Boll Zool 38:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorlick DL (1976) Dominance hierarchies and factors influencing dominance in the guppy Poecilia reticulata (Peters). Anim Behav 24:336–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris RJ (1985) A primer of multivariate statistics. Academic Press, Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  16. Houde AE (1987) Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Houde AE (1988) Effects of female choice and male-male competition on the mating success of male guppies. Anim Behav 36:510–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Houde AE, Endler JA (1990) Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248:1405–1408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Howard RD (1983) Sexual selection and variation in reproductive success in a long-lived organism. Am Nat 122:301–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hughes AL (1985) Male size, mating success, and mating strategy in the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis (Poeciliidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kennedy CEJ, Endler JA, Poyton SL, McMinn H (1987) Parasite load predicts mate choice in guppies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kodric-Brown A (1985) Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kodric-Brown A (1989) Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an enviromental component to female choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kodric-Brown A (1990) Mechanisms of sexual selection: insights from fishes. Ann Zool Fenn 27:87–100Google Scholar
  25. Kodric-Brown A (1992) Male dominance can enhance mating success in guppies. Anim Behav 44:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liley RN (1966) Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of Poeciliid fishes. Behaviour Suppl 13:1–197Google Scholar
  28. Long KD, Houde AE (1989) Orange spots as a visual cue for female mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 82:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luyten PH, Liley NR (1991) Sexual selection and competitive mating success of male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from four Trinidad populations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1990) Risk sensitive courtship in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behaviour 112:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McLennan DA, McPhail JD (1989) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial colouration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): the relationship between male colour and male behaviour. Can J Zool 67:1778–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344: 330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell SL (1990) The mating system genetically affects offspring performance in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). Evolution 44:502–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicoletto PF (1991) The relationship between male ornamentation and swimming performance in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reynolds JD, Gross MR (1992) Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc London B 250:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryan MJ, Causey BA (1989) “Alternative” mating behavior in the swordtails Xiphophorus nigrensis and Xiphophorus pygmaeus (Pisces: Poecillidae). Behav Ecol Sciobiol 24:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1982) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  38. Vehrencamp SL, Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1989) The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. Anim Behav 38:885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zuk M, Johnson K, Thornhill R, Ligon JD (1990) Mechanism of female choice in red jungle fowl. Evolution 44:477–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Astrid Kodric-Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations