Skip to main content

Reactivity of human iris-sphincter to muscarinic drugs in vitro

Summary

From tissue to tissue the contractile response of human irides to carbachol varied by 40 fold. The mean EC50 value of carbachol in tissues remaining in an in vitro environment for 24–37 h was equal, however, to that obtained from tissues examined during 79–161 h. The maximum response of the tissue to the highest concentration of carbachol increased up to 24 h, then a gradual decline in the maximum occurred. In 38 observations, the average decline after 72 h was ∼30%. A plot of negative log EC50 values (n = 38) of carbachol exhibited normal Gaussian curve. The geometric mean EC50 value of carbachol was 0.38 μmol/l (0.28–0.51 μmol/1, 95% C.L.). Based on EC50 values, the rank order of potency of cholinergic agonists is as follows: Muscarine = carbachol, 1 > pilocarpine, 115 > methacholine, 1/23 > bethanechol, 1/29 > acetylcholine, 1/1310. The percent maximum contraction of irides to muscarine, carbachol, pilocarpine, methacholine and bethanechol were 100, 100, 80, 76 and 95, respectively. Acetylcholine at the highest concentration tested produced 71% of the maximum produced by carbachol. Within a concentration range of 1 to 100 μmol/1, physostigmine consistently contracted isolated irides. The mean EC50 value was 6.73 μmol/1. The effect was sensitive to blockade by atropine.

When the temperature of the bathing medium was lowered from 37.5°C to 27.5°C or 17.5°C the magnitude and the duration of the response of the iris to carbachol was increased, the EC50 value, however, was not changed significantly. The response to pilocarpine was similarly altered by the lower temperature.

At 37.5°C, muscarinic receptor related dissociation constants (KB) of atropine, atropine methylbromide and cyclopentolate were 2.2, 0.37 and 8 nmol/l, respectively. Thus, in spite of many variables (such as hypoxia, temperature, iridic pigment, age, and drug diffusion) which could modify the quantitation of the response, the muscarinic receptor related dissociation constants of atropine in human iris appear to be similar to those reported in other mammalian species. Therefore, the species specific sensitivities of the iris-sphincter muscle to cholinergic stimulants may be attributed to post-receptor molecular events.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Akesson, C, Swanson C, Patil PN (1983) Muscarinic receptors of rabbit irides. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 322: 104–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunlakshana O, Schild HO (1959) Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists Br J Pharmacol 14:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow RB, Frank FM, Pearson JDM (1972) A comparison of the affinities of antagonists for acetylcholine receptors in ileum, bronchial muscle and iris of the guinea pig. Br J Pharmacol 46:300:314

    Google Scholar 

  • Bognar IT, Altes U, Beinhauer C, Kessler I, Fuder H (1992) A muscarinic receptor different from the M1, M2, M3, and M4 subtypes mediates the contraction of the rabbit iris sphincter. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 345:611–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman WC, Rand MJ (1980) Textbook of pharmacology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, p 39.25

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushny AR (1991) A textbook of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (or the action of drugs in health and diseases), 5th edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 282, p 318

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis LM, Patil PN (1971) A study of the cholinergic and ganglionic-stimulant drugs on the isolated bovine iris sphincter. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 190:249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming WW, Westfall DP DeLande IS, Jellett LB (1972) Log-normal distribution of equieffective doses of norepinephrine and acetylcholine in several tissues. J. Pharmacol Exp Ther 181:339–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Furchgott RF (1967) The pharmacological differentiation of adrenergic receptors: Am NY Acad Sci 139:553–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman S, Gilman A (1975) The parmacologic basis of therapeutics, 5th edn. MacMillan, New York, p 528

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LS, Shimmyo M, Hughes T (1974) Dose-response of cholinergic agonist on cat irides. Arch Ophthalmol 91:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Havener WH (1978) Ocular Pharmacology, 4th edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaumann AJ, Hennekes R (1979) The affinity of atropine for muscarinic receptor in human sphincter pupillae. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 306:209–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloog Y, Herons DS, Korczyn AD, Sachs DI, Sokolovsky M (1979) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in albino rabbit iris ciliary body. Mol Pharmacol 15:581–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishima S (1981) Clinical pharmacokinetics of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21:504–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil PN (1969) Adrenergic receptors of bovine iris sphincter. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 166:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil PN (1984) Some factors which affect the ocular drug responses. Trends Pharmacol Sci 5:201–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil PN, Griffiths JP (1988) Responses of equine, porcine and feline irides to cholinergic drugs. Pharmacologist 30: A57 (abstr no 43.2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton WDM, Rang HP (1965) The uptake of atropine and related drugs by intestinal smooth muscle of the guinea pig in relation to acetylcholine receptors. Proc Roy Soc B 163:1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar M, Shimada K, Patil PN (1976) Iris pigmentation and atropine mydriasis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 197:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarna T, Duleba A, Korytowski W, Swartz H (1980) Interaction of melanin with oxygen. Arch Biochem Biophys 200:140–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedeberg O (1921) Pharmakologie. Vogel, Leipzig, pp 167–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SA (1974) Quantitative studies on acetylcholine receptors of the isolated iris sphincter muscle. J Physiol 239:6–7P

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum JM (1963) Cumulative dose-response curve II, technique for the making of dose-response curves in isolated organs and evaluation of drug parameters. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 143:299–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Venter JC (1987) In: Symposia: Molecular architecture. Xth Int Congress Meeting, Sydney, Australia, and Venter JC et al. Rand C, Raper MJ (eds) Pharmacology. Excerpta Medica, New York, p 389

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi DN, DeSantis L, Patil PN (1973) Relative potency of cholinomimetic drugs on the bovine iris sphincter strips. Invest Ophthalmol 12: 80–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The preliminary report appeared as an abstract in the program of the Xth International Congress of Pharmacology, Sydney, Australia, 1987

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patil, P.N. Reactivity of human iris-sphincter to muscarinic drugs in vitro. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 346, 614–619 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168733

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168733

Key words

  • Human iris
  • Muscarinic receptor agonists
  • Low temperature
  • Increase in response
  • Dissociation constants