Skip to main content
Log in

Radioligand binding characteristics of the chicken cardiac muscarinic receptor

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The muscarinic receptor present in chicken cardiac membranes was characterised using a ligand binding approach and compared to the M1, M2 and M3 receptors that can be identified in ligand binding studies at present. [3H]N-methylscopolamine and [3H]pirenzepine appeared to label the same population of muscarinic receptors in chicken cardiac membranes since the density of sites labeled by the two radioligands was similar. Furthermore, affinity estimates of 8 muscarinic receptor antagonists for chicken cardiac muscarinic receptors were the same irrespective of whether [3H]N-methylscopolamine or [3H]pirenzepine was used as the radioligand. The chicken cardiac muscarinic receptor displayed high affinity for pirenzepine (pK i = 7.9) and so did not appear to represent an M2 receptor. Despite the high affinity of chicken cardiac muscarinic receptors for pirenzepine, affinity estimates for dicyclomine (pK i = 8.0), CPPS (pK i = 8.4) and 4DAMP (pK i = 8.6) in chicken heart were not consistent with the presence of M1 receptors. The chicken cardiac muscarinic receptor also displayed significant differences to the M3 receptor since it displayed high affinity for AF-DX 116 (pK i = 7.1) and methoctramine (pK i = 8.4). Finally, chicken heart muscarinic receptors displayed high affinity for gallamine (pK i = 7.0) and pirenzepine suggesting that the receptor was different to the M4 muscarinic receptor of the NG108-15 cell line. These findings suggest that chicken heart expresses a novel muscarinic receptor subtype distinct from the M1, M2, M3, and M4 subtypes already described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard EA (1988) Separating receptor subtypes from their shadows. Nature 335:301–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall NJM, Hulme EC, Keene M (1986) The binding of pirenzepine to digitonin-solubilized muscarinic acetylcholine receptors from the rat myocardium. Br J Pharmacol 87:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner TI, Buckley NJ, Young AC, Brann MR (1987) Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. Science 237:527–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner TI, Young AC, Brann MR, Buckley NJ (1988) Cloning and expression of the human and rat m5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. Neuron 1:403–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown TH, Goldstein D, Masters SB (1985) The putative M1 muscarinic receptor does not regulate phosphoinositide hydrolysis. Studies with pirenzepine and McN-A343 in chick heart and astrocytoma cells. Mol Pharmacol 27:525–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y-C, Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibitio constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50% inhibition (IC50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22:3099–3108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choo LK, Mitchelson F, Napier P (1988) Differences in antagonist affinities at the muscarinic receptors in chick and guinea-pig. J Autonom Pharmacol 8:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge A, Doods HN, Riesbos J, Van Zwieten PMBW (1986) Heterogeneity of muscarinic receptor binding sites in rat brain, submandibular gland and atrium. Br J Pharmacol 89 (Suppl): 551P

  • Delmendo R, Michel AD, Whiting RL (1989) Affinity estimates of muscarinic receptor antagonists for three putative muscarinic receptor subtypes. Br J Pharmacol 96:457–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglen RM, Whiting RL (1986) Muscarinic receptor subtypes: A critique of the current classification and a proposal for a working nomenclature. J Autonom Pharmacol 5:323–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer R, Giachetti A (1982) Muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1 and M2. Biochemical and functional characterization. Life Sci 31:2991–2994

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeck D, Lindmar R, Löffelholz K, Wanke M (1988) Subtypes of muscarinic receptor on cholinergic nerves and atrial cells of chicken and guinea-pig hearts. Br J Pharmacol 93:357–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwarta MM, Ptasienski J, Hosey MM (1988) Agonist-induced phosphorylation of the pig-atrial muscarinic receptor and its comparison with the chick heart receptor. FASEB J 2:A624

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel AD, Whiting RL (1988) Methoctramine, a polymethylene tetraamine, differentiates three subtypes of muscarinic receptor in direct binding studies. Eur J Pharmacol 145: 61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel AD, Delmendo R, Stefanich E, Whiting RL (1989) Pharmacological analysis of the muscarinic receptor subtype of the NG108-15 cell line. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol (in press)

  • Peralta EG, Ashkenazi A, Winslow JW, Smith DH, Ramachandran J, Capon DJ (1987) Distinct primary structures, ligand binding properties and tissue specific expression of four human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. EMBO J 6:3923–3929

    Google Scholar 

  • Sera M, Lei M, Roeske WR, Lui GK, Watson M, Yamamura HI (1988) The intact human neuroblastoma cell (SH-SY5Y) exhibit high affinity [3H]pirenzepine binding associated with hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositols. J Neurochem 50:1513–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroto S, Adam LP, Pappano AJ (1986) Comparison of muscarinic receptor properties in hatched chick heart atrium and ventricle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 236:602–609

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Send offprint requests to A. Michel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michel, A.D., Whiting, R.L. Radioligand binding characteristics of the chicken cardiac muscarinic receptor. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 340, 279–284 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168511

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168511

Key words

Navigation