Skip to main content
Log in

A model for the evolution of communal foraging in hierarchically structured populations

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A kin selection model is described for populations in which groups of interacting individuals (trait groups, sensu Wilson 1975) are spatially situated within larger aggregations. The model predicts the optimal foraging strategy when resources are shared with other trait group members and there is an individual risk in foraging. The ecological mechanism of variation in group fitness, differential resource accumulation, is explicitly incorporated into the model. The optimal foraging rate obtained from this model depends on the product of a benefit-to-cost ratio and a relatedness parameter. The appropriate definition of relatedness for the evolution of communal foraging is determined by the details of the ecological interaction between consumers and resources. When competition is purely intra-specific, the genetic correlation among interactants relative to other members of the local aggregation defines the relatedness parameter applicable to selection on foraging propensity. When competition is primarily inter-specific, the genetic correlation among trait group members relative to the entire population defines relatedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann SA (1974) Baboons, space, time, and energy. Am Zool 14:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram BCR (1980) Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Anim Behav 28:278–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Breden F, Wade MJ (1989) Selection within and between kin groups of the imported willow leaf beetle. Am Nat 134:35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cezilly F, Brun B, Hafner H (1991) Foraging and fitness. Acta Ecol 12:683–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Pamilo P, Crozier YC (1984) Relatedness and microgeographic genetic variation inRhytidoponera mayri, an australian arid-zone ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Smith BH, Crozier YC (1987) Relatedness and population structure of the primitively eusocial beeLasioglossum zehphyrum in Kansas. Evolution 41:902–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis SK, Strassmann JE, Hughes C, Pletscher LS, Templeton AR (1990) Population structure and kinship inPolistes, an analysis using ribosomal DNA and protein electrophoresis. Evolution 44:1242–1253

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1984) Cooperative Breeding in birds and mammals. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1984) Natural selection, kin selection, and group selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1985) A geometrical view of relatedness. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 2:28–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) the genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1975) Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. In: Fox gnR (ded) Biosocial Anthropology

  • Harpending H, Rogers A (1987) On Wright's mechanism for intergroup selection. J Theor Biol 127:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis JUM (1981) Eusociality in a mammal: cooperative breeding in naked mole rat colonies. Science 212:571–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin S (1982) A classification of selection-migration structures and conditions for protected polymorphism. In: Hecht MK, Wallace B, Prance GT (eds) Evolutionary biology. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JK (1992) Restricted migration and the evolution of altruism. Evolution 46:1492–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JK (1994) The effect of scale dependent processes on kin selection: mating and density regulation. Theor Pop Biol in press

  • Krebs JR, Davies NB (1987) An introduction to behavioral ecology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley DE, Wade MJ, Breden FJ, Wohltman M (1988) Spatial and temporal variation in group relatedness: evidence from the imported willow leaf beetle. Evolution 42:184–192

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale DB (1988) Relatedness among nestmates in a primitively social wasp,Cerceris antipodes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Moehlman PD (1979) Jackal helpers and pup survival. Nature 277:382–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1989) Estimating relatedness in social groups. Trends Ecol Evol 4:353–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Pyke GH, Caraco T (1982) The scanning behavior of juncos: a game theoretic approach. J Theor Biol 95:89–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1992) Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. Am Nat 139:540–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1994) Genetic relatedness in a viscous population. Evol Ecol, in press

  • Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Hughes CR (1992) Genetic relatedness and population structure in primitively eusocial wasps in the genusMischocyttarus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Hymenopt Res 1:81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A (1966) A mathematical model of the culling process in dairy cattle. Anim Prod 8:95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG, Carpenter JM (1991) Population genetic structure, relatedness and breeding systems. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps, Cornell University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG, Matthews RW (1989) Population genetic structure and social evolution in the sphecid waspMicrostigmus comes. Am Nat 134:574–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Queller DC, Hughes CR, Turillazzi S, Cervo R, Davis SK, Goodnight KF (1989) Genetic relatedness in primitively eusocial wasps. Nature 342:268–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD (1992) Inclusive fitness in a homogenous environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 249:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1980) Kin selection: its components. Science 210:665–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1982) Evolution of interference competition by individual, family and group selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:3575–3578

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1985) Hard selection, soft selection, kin selection, and group selection. Am Nat 125:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS (1975) A theory of group selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS (1980) The natural selection of populations and communities. Menlo Park Publications, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Pollock GB, Dugatkin LA (1992) Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? Evol Ecol 6:331–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1984) The Florida scrub jay. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. Pamilo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, J.K. A model for the evolution of communal foraging in hierarchically structured populations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35, 205–212 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167961

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167961

Key words

Navigation