Skip to main content
Log in

The concept of delay

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The word “delay” is so widely used that it may be assumed to be a simple concept which is well understood. It is taken to be a name for wasted time on a journey, but attempts to quantify it in order to use it as a measure of performance of a transportation facility have not given complete satisfaction. Drivers are observed to behave in ways which reveal attitudes to wasted time which differ from those of the researcher. These problems have been reported in many studies but do not seem to have been pursued.

This paper discusses the concept of delay. A basic definition leads to problems of measurement which suggest alternative definitions which have more apparent relevance to traffic networks in which more than one cause of delay is of interest. Further speculation about these definitions points to the fact that delay can be either of two separate concepts.

In conclusion it is argued that delay should no longer be regarded as an objective quantity capable of direct measurement. Instead of delay being thought the cause of driver annoyance, it should be taken that it is the existence of driver frustration which converts time lost into delay. It is better to define delay as unwanted journey time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Department of the Environment (1972). Getting the Best Roads for Our Money: the COBA Method of Appraisal. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1976). Transport Policy: A Consultative Document. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highway Research Board (1972). Special Report 130, Measures of the Quality of Traffic Service. Washington.

  • Horn, J. W., Cribbens, P. D., Blackburn, J. D. and Vick, C. E. (1961). The Effect of Commercial Roadside Development in North Carolina. Highway Research Board Bulletin 303, Washington.

  • Jones, T. R. and Potts, R. B. (1962). “The measurement of acceleration noise — a traffic parameter,” Operations Research 10 (6): 745–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrock, J. N. and Tillotson, H. T. (1978). “Instrumented Car: Delay Distribution and Fuel Consumption Study.” Final Report S.R.C. Contract B/RG/8182.0 Department of Transportation and Environmental Planning, University of Birmingham. (Available only on microfiche).

  • Messenger, G. S.,-Richardson, D. B., Graefe, P. W. U. and Mufti, I. H. (1980). Urban Traffic Signal Control for Fuel Economy. National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada, Mechanical Engineering Report ME-247. McDonald, M. C. (1977). “Geometric Delays at Roundabouts,” Technical Report, Transport Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southampton.

  • Webster, F. V. (1958). Traffic Signal Settings. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Research Technical Paper No. 39. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. V. and Cobbe, B. M. (1966). Traffic Signals. Road Research Technical Paper No. 56. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tillotson, H.T. The concept of delay. Transportation 10, 393–404 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167938

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167938

Keywords

Navigation