Abstract
Based on an analysis of observed automobile routes, an investigation is made into the factors affecting choice of routes. As in previous studies, the attempt to determine the influence of time and distance simultaneously was unsuccessful. However, time was found to be an important factor in the description of route choice behaviour. An improved description of route choice behaviour is achieved if a differentiation according to road type is made or if intersections are included in the model as explanatory variables. The subjective or perceived generalized times caused by intersections are approximately 0.88 minutes and those caused by left-turn movements are 2.55 minutes. The result could further be improved by dividing the difference in generalized times between two routes by the root of the generalized times. A great advantage of this approach is also that it links up better with stochastic assignment models, in which traffic is randomly distributed over alternative routes. In particular for studies on extraneous traffic and the consequences of traffic-controls, the method presented here serves as a start for further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, R. D. and Langdon, M. C. (1976). “An individual cost minimizing method of determining modal split between three travel models,” TRRL Laboratory Report 698. Crowthorne, Berkshire.
Burrell, J. E. (1968). “Multiple route assignment and its application to capacity restraint,” 4th International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow. Strassenbau und Strassenverkehrstechnik, 86.
Burrell, J. E. (1974). “Multiple route assignment: a comparison of two methods,” pp. 229–239 in Florian, M.A. (ed.), Traffic Equilibrium Model. Proceedings Int. Symp. on Traffic Equilibrium Methods, Montreal. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dial, R. (1971). “A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration,” Transportation Research 5: 83–111.
Domencich, T. A. and McFadden, D. (1975). “Urban travel demand: a behavioral analysis.” Amsterdam, Oxford, New York. North/Holland/American Elsevier, pp. 47–122.
Hamerslag, R. (1979). “Onderzoek naar routekeuze met behulp van een gedisaggregeerd logit model,” Verkeerskunde 8: 377–382.
Outram, V. E. and Thompson, E. (1978). “Drivers perceived cost in route choice,” PTRC Summer Annual Meeting. Transportation Models, pp. 226–234.
Ratcliffe, E. P. (1972). “A comparison of drivers route choice criteria and those used in current assignment processes,” Traffic Engineering and Control 13 (11/12): 526–529.
Tagliacozzo, F. and Pirzio, F. (1973). “Assignment models and urban path selection criteria. Results of a survey of behaviour of road users,” Transportation Research 3: 313–329.
Wright, Ch. and Orrom, H. (1976). “The Westminster route choice survey: a new technique for traffic studies,” Traffic Engineering and Control, pp. 348–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamerslag, R. Investigation into factors affecting the route choice in “Rijnstreek-West” with the aid of a disaggregate logit model. Transportation 10, 373–391 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167937
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167937