Skip to main content
Log in

Parking policy and urban goals: Linking strategy to needs

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parking management strategies have traditionally been used as a means of accommodating traffic demand, with little or no effort made to identify how such strategies might relate to other urban objectives. In this paper, parking management strategies are classified according to the control they exert over the amount of aggregate parking supply, access to parking, spatial distribution of parking supply, or dollar price of parking. Six general categories of urban policy objectives are identified, and the relationship between parking strategies and these objectives analyzed. The parking program in Baltimore is used to illustrate some of the relationships identified in this analysis. This paper concludes that the linkage between parking and the attainment of some urban objectives is potentially quite strong, and that further empirical research is needed to fully establish this relationship. Several different directions for further research are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brophy, J. M. and Voccola, H. W. (1979). “Washington D.C.'s parking enforcement program,” Parking: 30–38.

  • DiRenzo, J., Citria, B. and Barber, E. (1979). Study of Parking Management Tactics, Volume 1. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

  • Evans, H. K. (1963). “Parking study applications,” Traffic Quarterly 17: 274–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greater Baltimore Committee (1980). Report of the Parking Subcommittee.

  • Kulash, D. (1974). “Parking Taxes As Roadway Prices: A Case Study of the San Francisco Experience,” The Urban Institute.

  • McGee, J. P. (1978). "Metrocenter Parking Study Update," Report prepared for the City of Baltimore Planning Department.

  • McShane, M. and Meyer, M. D. (1979). “Links Between Parking Policy and Urban Goals: Key Issues,” Working Memorandum No. 1, Center for Transportation Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Meyer, M. D. and Sheldon-Dean, J. (1980). The Role of Enforcement in Short-Range Transportation Planning. Final Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Report MA-11-0034.

  • Pushkarev, B. and Zupan, J. (1975). Urban Space For Pedestrians. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisfeld, J. (1980). “The Downtown parking debate: Who's in charge here?” Baltimore Magazine.

  • Shoup, D. C. and Pickrell, D. H. (1980). Free Parking As A Transportation Problem. Final Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Report DOT-OS-80011.

  • Simkowitz, H., Heder, L. and Barber, E. (1979). “Parking permit programs to restrain the automobile in residential neighborhoods,” Transportation Research Forum 20: 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. (1965). Parking In The City Center. Automobile Manufacturers Association.

  • Smith, W. (1970). “Final Report — Downtown Baltimore Parking Study,” Report prepared for the City of Baltimore Planning Department.

  • Tanaka, J. and Meyer, M. D. (1981). "Implementation of A Regional Parking Policy: Institutional And Political Considerations," presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mcshane, M., Meyer, M.D. Parking policy and urban goals: Linking strategy to needs. Transportation 11, 131–152 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167928

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167928

Keywords

Navigation