Skip to main content
Log in

Radical interpretation and the permutation principle

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Davidson has claimed that to conclude that reference is inscrutable, one must assume that “If some theory of truth ... is satisfactory in the light of all relevant evidence ... then any theory that is generated from the first theory by a permutation will also be satisfactory in the light of all relevant evidence.” However, given that theories of truth are not directly read off the world, but rather serve as parts of larger theories of behavior, this assumption is far from self-evident. A proper understanding of the role truth theories play in theories of interpretation makes the inscrutability of reference much less wide-spread than Davidson suggests, and, as a result, the radical interpretation methodology is much less likely to saddle its defenders with counterintuitive cases of indeterminacy than is commonly supposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidson, D.: 1974a, ‘Belief and the Basis of Meaning’, in Davidson 1984.

  • Davidson, D.: 1974b, ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, in Davidson 1984.

  • Davidson, D.: 1975, ‘Thought and Talk’, in Davidson 1984.

  • Davidson, D.: 1977, ‘Reality without Reference’, in Davidson 1984.

  • Davidson, D.: 1979, ‘The Inscrutability of Reference’, in Davidson 1984.

  • Davidson, D.: 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1986, ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, in E.Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1987, ‘Knowing One's Own Mind’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, pp. 441–58.

  • Davidson, D.: 1990a, ‘Meaning Truth and Evidence’, in R. B.Barrett and R. F.Gibson (eds.) Perspectives on Quine, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 77–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1990b, ‘The Structure and Content of Truth’, The Journal of Philosophy 87, 279–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M.: 1984, Realism and Truth, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, R.: 1973, ‘Reference, Meaning, and Belief’, The Journal of Philosophy 70, 439–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R.: 1986, Translation Determined, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Refutation of Conventionalism’, in Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1984, ‘Models and Reality’, in Realism and Reason, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1990, The Pursuit of Truth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1987, ‘Indeterminacy, Empiricism and the First Person’, The Journal of Philosophy 84, 123–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1959, Individuals, Menthuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N. L.: 1959, ‘Substance Without Substrata’, Review of Metaphysics 12, 521–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackman, H. Radical interpretation and the permutation principle. Erkenntnis 44, 317–326 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167661

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167661

Keywords

Navigation