Abstract
We use quotation marks when we wish to refer to an expression. We can and do so refer even when this expression is composed of characters which do not occur in our alphabet. That's why Tarski's, Quine's, and Geach's theories of quotation don't work. The proposals of Davidson, Frege, and C. Washington, however, do not provide a plausible account of quotation either. The problem is to construct a Tarskian theory of truth for an object language which contains quotation marks, without appealing to quotation marks in the metalanguage. I propose to supply Tarski's truth definition with an axiom which determines the denotation of all expressions containing quotation marks. According to this axiom, quotation marks create a non-extensional context. Since our admitting such contexts does not lead to any difficulties in our recursive truth characterization, we may indeed dispense with extensionalism. Finally, I argue that we classify and denote expressions in the very same way that we classify and denote extralinguistic entities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, J: 1988, ‘Quotation’, Noûs 22, 399–418.
Davidson, D.: 1966, ‘Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages’, in Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed), Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 383–94. Seitenangaben beziehen sich auf den Abdruck in (Davidson 1984, pp. 3–15).
Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘Truth and Meaning’, Synthese 17, 304–23. Seitenangaben beziehen sich auf den Abdruck in (Davidson 1984, pp. 17–36).
Davidson, D.: 1979, ‘Quotation’, Theory and Decision 11, 27–40. Seitenangaben beziehen sich auf den Abdruck in (Davidson 1984, pp. 79–92).
Davidson, D.: 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Frege, G.: 1892, ‘Uber Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik NF 100, 25–50. Seitenangaben beziehen sich auf den Abdruck in (Frege 1986, pp. 40–65).
Frege, G.: 1986, Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien, herausgegeben und eingeleitet von G. Patzig, 6. Auflage, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Geach, P.: 1957, Mental acts. Their Content and their Objects, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Goldsmith, J. A.: 1979, Autosegmental Phonology, Garland, New York.
Larson, R. K. and P.Ludlow: 1993, ‘Interpreted Logical Forms’, Synthese 95, 305–355.
Ockham, W.v.: 1984, Summe der Logik. Aus Teil I: Über die Termini, ausgewählt, übersetzt und mit Einführung und Anmerkungen herausgegeben von P. Kunze, Lateinisch-Deutsch, Meiner, Hamburg.
Peirce, C. S.: 1933, ‘Existential Graphs. My chef d'oevre.’ In Hartshorne, C. and P.Weiss (eds), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume IV: The Simplest Mathematics, Harvard UP, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 291–470.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1969, ‘Reply to Davidson’, in Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. O. Quine, Davidson, D. and J.Hintikka (eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 333–335.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1980, ‘Reference and Modality’, in From a Logical Point of View. Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, 2nd edition, Harvard UP, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 139–59.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1982, Methods of Logic, 4th edition, Harvard UP, Cambridge, Mass.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1987, Quiddities. An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary, Harvard UP, Cambridge, Mass.
Tarski, A.: 1935, ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia philosophica 1, 261–405. Seitenangaben beziehen sich auf die englische Übersetzung unter dem Titel ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in (Tarski 1956, pp. 152–278).
Tarski, A.: 1956, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1939, translated by J. H. Woodger, Clarendon, Oxford.
Tennant, N.: 1977, ‘Recursive Semantics for Knowledge and Belief’, The Monist 60, 419–430.
Washington, C.: 1992, ‘The Identity Theory of Quotation’, The Journal of Philosophy 89, 582–605.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, O. Zitierte zeichenreihen. Erkenntnis 44, 279–304 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167659
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167659