Abstract
This paper discusses the aesthetic and ecological effects of highways. Little is known about the subject at the present time, and thus this treatment cannot be considered in any sense definitive.
Part I offers a definition of aesthetic quality and considers its relevance to highway planning. It is noted that, although the principles of rural freeway design (curvilinear alignments, variable medians, etc.) generally accord with the aesthetic character of rural areas, freeways are infinitely more difficult to integrate aesthetically into urban areas. Comparisons are made in this regard among basic types of freeways.
Part II notes that the effect of man's presence on the earth's ecology has resulted in new systems and processes to which man is now subject. Highways, as works of man, affect him and his environment in ways which are known only imperfectly. Nevertheless, there are steps which can be taken to minimize the more obvious forms of damage to the environment which can result from highway building.
Part III discusses procedures for incorporating aesthetic and ecological considerations into highway planning. No method yet proposed is in itself sufficient, and none leads to a decision on an objective basis. A generally acceptable method must await further research. In the meantime, every effort must be made to assure full and fair consideration of environmental effects on an ad hoc basis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appleyard, D. (1971). “Simulated Trip on an Automated Freeway,” a film shown at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., January.
Churchill, W. (1943). “H. C. Debates,” October 28, quoted in Andrews, G. A. ed., (1966), European Political Institutions, A Comparative Government Reader, 2nd ed., p. 327. New York: Van Nostrand.
Dansereau, P. (1966). “Ecological Impact and Human Ecology,” in Darling, F. F. and Milton, J. P., eds., Future Environments of North America: Transportation of a Continent, pp. 425–463. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension, p. 159. GardenCity, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Halprin, L. Cities, p. 117. New York: Reinhold.
Halprin, L. (1966). Freeways, New York: Reinhold.
Johnson, H. A. and Huff, J. M. (1966). “Toward Measuring the Intangible Values of Natural Beauty.” paper presented at Annual Meeting, Soil Conservation Society of America, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Aug. 14–17.
Maass, A. (1966). “Benefit-Cost Analysis: Its Relevance to Public Investment Decisions.” Q. J. Econ. 80 (May): 208–226.
McHarg, I. L. (1968). “A Comprehensive Highway Route Selection Method.” Highway Research Record No. 246, pp. 1–15. Washington, D. C.: Highway Research Board (National Academy of Sciences-National Academy of Engineering).
McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with Nature. Garden City, N. Y.: Natural History Press.
Peterson, B. L. (1970). “Applied Ecology in the Highway Program.” Washington, D. C.: Federal Highway Administration, Environmental Development Division. November (Mimeographed).
Rapuano, M., et al. (1968). The Freeway in the City-Principles of Planning and Design. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Gov. Pr. Office.
Riedesel, G. A. (1968). Social, Economic and Environmental Impact of Highway Transportation Facilities on Urban Communities. Pullman, Washington: Washington State Univ.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (1970). Environmental Factors in Highway Location and Design: A Report by the Work Force on Evaluation of Environmental Factors, pp. 1–2, Sept. 15 (Mimeographed).
Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition (1968). Cleveland and New York: World Publishing Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moser, P.J. Aesthetic and ecological disharmonies of highways. Transportation 1, 55–67 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167508
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167508