Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice

Abstract

We examine the evolutionary consequences of copying mate choice using models in which the preferences of younger females are affected by the mate choices that they observe older females making. We introduce two models of copying, termed “single mate copying” and “mass copying”, corresponding to situations in which immature females imprint on the choices of only one or of a very large number of older females, respectively. Female mating preferences are assumed to evolve only through cultural evolution, while the male trait on which they act is inherited either via a haploid autosomal or a Y-linked locus. Results show that the preference and male trait can rapidly coevolve, with a positive frequencey-dependent advantage to the more common male trait allele. This process can cause a display trait that lowers male viability to increase in a population. Mass copying results in stronger frequency dependence than does single mate copying. Mass copying and, under some conditions, single mate copying lead to two alterative stable equilibria for the male trait. Neither copying model supports variation at the male trait locus, and copying makes it more difficult for a novel male trait phenotype to spread.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aoki K (1989) A sexual-selection model for the evolution of imitative learning of song in polygynous birds. Am Nat 134:599–612

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bikhchandani S, Hirschleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom and cultural change as informational cascades. J Politic Econ 100:992–1026

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1988) An evolutionary model of social learning: the effects of spatial and temporal variation. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1989) Social learning as an adaptation. In: Some mathematical questions in biology: models in population biology. Lectures on mathematics in the life sciences, vol 20, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bradbury JW, Gibson R (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradbury J, Vehrencamp S, Gibson R (1985) Leks and the unanimity of mate choice. In: Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH, Slatkin M (eds) Evolution: essays in honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breden F, Stoner G (1987) Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy. Nature 329:831–833

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curtsinger JW, Heisler IL (1988) A diploid “sexy son” model. Am Nat 132:437–453

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dugatkin LA (1992) Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat 139:1384–1389

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dugatkin LA, Godin J-G (1992) Reversal of female mate choice by copying. Proc R Soc London B 249:179–184

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dugatkin LA, Godin J-G (1993) Sexual selection and female copying: age dependent effects. Behav Ecol 4:289–292

    Google Scholar 

  14. Endler J (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91

    Google Scholar 

  15. Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in Poeciliid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 9:173–190

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frank SA (1990) When to copy or void an opponent's strategy. J Theor Biol 145:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson RM, Bachman GC (1992) The costs of female choice in a lekking bird. Behav Ecol 3:300–309

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gibson RM, Hoglund J (1992) Copying and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 7:229–232

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gomulkiewicz R, Hastings A (1990) Ploidy and evolution by sexual selection: a comparison of haploid and diploid female choice models near fixation equilibria. Evolution 44:757–770

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haskins C, Haskins E, McLaughin J, Hewitt R (1961) Polymorphism and population structure in Lebistes reticulatus, a population study. In: Blair W (ed) Vertebrate speciation. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 320–395

    Google Scholar 

  21. Houde AE (1987) Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41:110

    Google Scholar 

  22. Houde AE (1988) Genetic difference in female choice between two guppy populations. Anim Behav 36:510–516

    Google Scholar 

  23. Houde AE, Endler J (1990) Correlated evolution of female mating preference and male color pattern in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Science 248:1405–1408

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kirkpatrick M (1987) Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:43–70

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of female mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laland KN (1994a) On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. Evolution (in press)

  28. Laland KN (1994b) Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theor Popul Biol (in press)

  29. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lill A (1974) Sexual behavior of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Hartert). Z Tierpsychol 36:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  31. Losey GS Jr, Stanton FG, Telecky TM, Tyler WA III, Zoology 691 graduate seminar class (1986) Copying others, an evolutionarily stable strategy for mate choice: a model. Am Nat 128:653–664

    Google Scholar 

  32. O'Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  33. Otto SP (1991) On evolution under sexual and viability selection: a two-locus diploid model. Evolution 45:1443–1457

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pomiankowski A (1987) The costs of choice in sexual selection. J Theor Biol 128:195–218

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pomiankowski A (1988) The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 5:136–184

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pruett-Jones S (1992) Independent versus non-independent mate choice: Do females copy each other? Am Nat 140:1000–1009

    Google Scholar 

  38. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (1989) The role of evolved predispositions in cultural evolution, or, human sociobiology meets Pascal's wager. Ethol Sociobiol 10:195–219

    Google Scholar 

  39. Real L (1990) Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am Nat 136:376–404

    Google Scholar 

  40. Romanes G (1884) Animal intelligence. Appelton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 7:157–195

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schlupp I, Marler C, Ryan MJ (1994) Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. Science 263:373–374

    Google Scholar 

  43. Seger J (1985) Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution 39:1185–1193

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stoner G, Breden F (1988) Phenotypic differentiation in female preference related to geographic variation in male predation risk in the Trinidad guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wade MJ, Pruett-Jones SG (1990) Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proc Nat Acad Sciences USA 87:5749–5753

    Google Scholar 

  46. Winge O (1927) The location of eighteen genes in Lebistes reticulatus. J Genetics 18:1–43

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wolfram S (1991) Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zentall TR, Galeff BG (1988) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: M. Kirkpatrick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirkpatrick, M., Dugatkin, L.A. Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34, 443–449 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167336

Download citation

Key words

  • Copying
  • Mete choice
  • Sexual selection
  • Social learning