Skip to main content
Log in

The cost of parental care and egg cannibalism in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Male river bullheads guard and care for egg masses during a single brood cycle every breeding season. A study of two bullhead populations demonstrated that nesting males show a strong reduction in food intake rate and that their physical condition deteriorates during parental care. The estimated weight loss for the average guarding male was 18.8% in one population and 13.5% in the other. This could in part be responsible for the peak of male mortality observed during the second part of the breeding season. A high incidence of egg cannibalism was observed in males guarding eggs. Analysis of the developmental stage of individual egg masses demonstrated that heterocannibalism is very rare in this species and that the observed rate of egg cannibalism is mainly due to guarding males preying upon their own eggs (filial cannibalism). In both populations the frequency of filial cannibalism was negatively correlated with the male's chance of getting other food items. The probability of a male cannibalizing its own eggs was also significantly influenced by the time elapsed since the beginning of parental care. The observed limited cannibalism of progeny in the river bullhead cannot be explained as a male's strategy for obtaining energy to be used in subsequent brood cycles, as suggested for other fishes which show filial cannibalism. Rather, it can be interpreted as a behaviour aimed at avoiding the risk of dying of starvation before the eggs hatch. The observed criteria of female mate choice, i.e. a preference for males in good physical condition and for males that already have eggs in their nests, are consistent with the prediction of Rohwer's filial cannibalism theory, although other hypotheses cannot be excluded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belles-Isles JC, FitzGerald GJ (1991) Filial cannibalism in sticklebacks: a reproductive management strategy? Ethol Ecol Evol 3:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Belles-Isles JC, Cloutier D, FitzGerald GJ (1990) Female cannibalism and male courtship tactics in the threespine stickleback. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:363–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisazza A, Marconato A (1987) Strategic riproduttive nei pesci teleostei con cure parentali. Boll Ace Gioenia Sci Nat 20:301–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisazza A, Marconato A (1988) Female mate choice, male-male competition and parental care in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Anim Behav 36:1352–1360

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer LS (1986) Parental care sex differences in the brown bullhead, Ictalurus nebulosus (Pisces, Ictaluridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RM, Fischer RU (1991) Brood size, male fanning effort and the energetics of a nonsharable parental investment in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis maerochirus (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Ethology 87:177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantz GD (1985) Allopaternal care in the tessellated darter, Etheostoma olmstedi (Pisces: Percidae). Environ Biol Fishes 14:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • De Martini EE (1987) Paternal defence, cannibalism and polygamy: factors influencing the reproductive success of painted greenling (Pisces: Hexagrammidae). Anim Behav 35:1145–1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominey WJ, Blumer LS (1984) Cannibalism of early life stages in fishes. In: Hausfater C, Blaffer-Hrdy S (eds) Infanticide: comparative and evolutionary perspectives. Aldine, New York, pp 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerlad GJ (1992) Filial cannibalism in fishes: why do parents eat their offspring? Trends Ecol Evol 7:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt T, Bakker TCM (1990) Determinants of reproductive success of male sticklebacks in the field and in the laboratory. Neth J Zool 40:664–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzer G (1988) Filial cannibalism in a non-brood cycling marine fish. Environ Biol Fishes 21:309–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt KD, Ringler NH (1989) Egg cannibalism and the reproductive strategies of threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in a coastal British Columbia lake. Can J Zool 67:2036–2046

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson IG, Colgan PW (1989) Eggs in the nests of males and their effect on mate choice in the three-spined stickleback. Anim Behav 38:859–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Kynard B (1979) Breeding behaviour of a lacustrine population of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behaviour 67:178–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom K, Hellstrom M (1993) Male size and parental care in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Ecol Ethol Evol 5

  • Marconato A (1986) Strategie riproduttive e selezione sessuale in tre specie di pesci teleostei d'acqua dolce. Unpubl Ph.D. Thesis, University of Padova, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconato A (1991) Life-history tactics and population structure in freshwater fish species. In: Lanzavecchia G, Valvassori R (eds) Form and function and zoology. Selected Symposia and Monographs U.Z.I. Mucchi, Modena, pp 379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconato A, Bisazza A (1986) Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Anim Behav 34:1580–1582

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconato A, Bisazza A (1988) Mate choice, egg cannibalism and reproductive success in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. J Fish Biol 33:905–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris D (1955) The reproductive behaviour of the river bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) with special reference to the fanning activity. Behaviour 7:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrowka W (1987) Filial cannibalism and reproductive success in the maternal mouthbrooding cichlid fish Pseudocrendabrus multicolor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:257–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochi H (1985) Termination of parental care due to small clutch size in the temperate damselfish, Chromis notata. Environ Biol Fishes 12:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Perini V (1991) Osservazioni sulla biologia di due popolazioni di Cottus gobio L. Dissertation, University of Padova, Padova

  • Petersen CW (1989) Females prefer mating males in the carmine triplefin, Axoclinus carminalis, a paternal brood-guarder. Environ Biol Fishes 26:312–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen CW (1990) The occurrence and dynamics of clutch loss and filial cannibalism in two Caribbean damselfishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 135:117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen CW, Marchetti K (1989) Filial cannibalism in the Cortez damselfish Stegastes rectifraenum. Evolution 43:158–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Qasim SZ (1957) The biology of Centronotus gunnellus (L.) (Teleostei). J Anim Ecol 26:389–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M, Retchen C (1981) Female stickelbacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76:152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S (1978) Parental cannibalism of offsprings and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Am Nat 112:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Salfert IG, Moodie GEE (1985) Filial cannibalism in the brook stickleback, Culaea incostans (Kirtland). Behaviour 93:82–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC, Gross MR (1985) Parental investment decision rules and the Concorde fallacy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:43–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC, Gross MR (1986) Williams' principle: and explanation of parental care in teleost fishes. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, Beckenham, pp 275–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkel PC (1989) Egg presence and developmental stage influence spawning-site choice by female garibaldi. Anim Behav 38:447–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH, Goldsmith LD, Polgree JA, Mayer LM (1989) Foraging patterns of nesting and nonnesting sunfish (Centrarchidae: Lepomis auritus and L. gibbosus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1342–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger LM (1983) Nest defence by deceit in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger LM, Sargent RC (1988) Allopaternal care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: females prefer males with eggs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Worgan JP, FitzGerald GJ (1981) Diel activity and diet of three sympatric sticklebacks in tidal salt marsh pool. Can J Zool 59:2375–2379

    Google Scholar 

  • Whoriskey FG, FitzGerald GJ (1985) Sex, cannibalism and the sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton RJ (1990) Ecology of teleost fishes. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: A. Marconato

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marconato, A., Bisazza, A. & Fabris, M. The cost of parental care and egg cannibalism in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32, 229–237 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166512

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166512

Keywords

Navigation