Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On weighted visual field indices

  • Communications
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson DR (1992) Automated static perimetry. Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Åsman P, Heijl A (1992) Evaluation of methods for automated hemifield analysis in perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 110 (in press)

  3. Brenton RS, Phelps CD (1986) The normal visual field on the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Ophthalmologica 193:56–74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Funkhouser A, Fankhauser F (1991) The effects of weighting the “mean defect” visual field index according to threshold variability in the central and midperipheral visual field. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229:228–231

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heijl A, Åsman P (1988) A clinical study of perimetric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 107:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J (1987) Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 105:1544–1549

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J (1987) A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J, Åsman P (1988) Visual field interpretation with perimetric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 107:204–208

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katz J, Sommer A (1986) Asymmetry and variation in the normal hill of vision. Arch Ophthalmol 104:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis RA, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Labermeier PK (1986) Variability of quantitative perimetry in normal observers. Ophthalmology 93:878–881

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parrish PK, Schiffman I, Anderson DR (1984) Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1497–1502

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Malmö General Hospital, S-21401, Malmö, Sweden

    Anders Heijl & Peter Åsmanl

  2. Department Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, Sweden

    Georg Lindgren & Jonny Olsson

Authors
  1. Anders Heijl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georg Lindgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonny Olsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Åsmanl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heijl, A., Lindgren, G., Olsson, J. et al. On weighted visual field indices. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230, 397–398 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165953

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165953

Keywords

Search

Navigation