Skip to main content
Log in

Conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic wearers of soft contact lenses

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conjunctival epithelium was systematically investigated with impression cytology in clinically asymptomatic wearers of soft contact lenses who had been using their lenses for several years. Severe abnormalities were observed, which had so far only been seen in diseases of the ocular surface mainly in dry eye syndromes. All patients showed evidence of squamous metaplasia with distinctly enlarged, flattened cells without evidence of keratinization. They also showed frequent nuclear abnormalities, primarily a high percentage of snakelike-appearing condensations of nuclear chromatin (snakes). The goblet cell density observed was relatively low. Snakes were for the first time detected outside the known localization (upper bulbar conjunctiva, 12 o'clock position) and could be demonstrated throughout the whole bulbar conjunctival epithelium. It is suggested that the changes observed are due to chronic mechanical irritation by the contact lens, as indicated by their topographical distribution and as proven by their reversibility after omission of contact lens wear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Khalek LMR, Williamson J, Lee WR (1978) Morphological changes in the human conjunctival epithelium. 1. In the normal elderly population. Br J Ophthalmol 62:792–799

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdel-Khalek LMR, Williamson J, Lee WR (1978) Morphological changes in the human conjunctival epithelium. 2. In keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Br J Ophthalmol 62:800–806

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adams A (1979) The morphology of human conjunctival mucus. Arch Ophthalmol 97:730–734

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brewitt H, Sander H (1982) Hornhautbefunde nach Tragen von Kontaktlinsen. Z Prakt Augenheilkd 4:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  5. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM (1977) A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmo1 84:798–801

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbard JP (1985) Tear film osmolarity and keratoconjunctivitis sicca In: Holly FJ (ed) Proceedings. Ist International Tear Film Symposium, Lubbock, Texas, pp 127–137

  7. Götz ML, Jaeger W, Kruse FE (1986) Impressionszytologie der Bindehaut. Eine nichtinvasive Untersuchungsmethode. 1. Technik der Entnahme. Fortschr Ophthalmol 83:31–33

    Google Scholar 

  8. Götz ML, Jaeger W, Kruse FE (1986) Impressionszytologie der Bindehaut. Eine nichtinvasive Untersuchungsmethode. 2. Lichtmikroskopische Befunde bei normaler Conjunctiva, bei Keratoconjunctivitis sicca und bei Kontaktlinsenträgern. Fortschr Ophthalmol 83:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greiner JV, Allansmith MR (1981) Effects of contact lens wear on the human conjunctival mucus system. Ophthalmology 88:821

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greiner JV, Covington HI, Korb DR, Allansmith MR (1978) Conjunctiva in asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 86:403–413

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holly FJ, Lemp MA (1971) Wettability and wetting of corneal epithelium. Exp Eye Res 11:239–250

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kessing SV (1966) Investigations of the conjunctival mucin. Acta Ophthalmo1 44:439–453

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kessing SV (1968) Mucus gland system of the conjunctiva. Acta Ophthalmol 95 [Suppl]:1–133

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knop E (1988) Impressionscytologische Untersuchung der Conjunctiva bei Trägern weicher Kontaktlinsen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des “Snake-like-chromatin”. Dissertation, Hannover 1988

  15. Knop E (1990) Employment of a BSE-detector system for demonstration of morphological nuclear changes. Beitr Elektronenmikr. Direktabb. Oberfl. 23:343–346

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knop E, Brewitt H (1989) Klinische Studie über Weflex 55 und das Pflegesystem Polyrinse. Contactologia 11:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Knop E, Brewitt H (1990) Snakelike condensations of nuclear chromatin. Cell Biol Int Rep 14 [Suppl]:221

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koch JM, Waubke TN (1987) Impressionscytologie und ihr licht- und elektronenmikroskopisches Äquivalent bei Patienten mit Keratokonjunctivitis sicca. Fortschr Ophthalmol 84:446–449

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koch JM, Bornfeld N, Waubke TN, Wessing A (1988) Impressionszytologie der Bindehaut nach hochdosierter Brachytherapie maligner Melanome der Uvea mit 106 RU/106 RH-Applikatoren. Fortschr Ophthalmol 85:642–645

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kruse FE, Rohen JW, Götz ML, Schmitz W (1986) Impressionszytologie der Bindehaut. Eine nichtinvasive Untersuchungsmethode. 3. Der Einsatz von Rasterelektronenmikroskopie und Transmissionselektronenmikroskopie an impressionscytologischen Präparaten. Fortschr Ophthalmol 83:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lemp MA, Dohlman CH (1971) Dry eye secondary to mucus deficiency. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 75:1223–1227

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lemp MA, Holly FJ, Shuzo I, Dohlman CH (1983) The precorneal tear film. I. Factors in spreading and maintaining a continuous tear film over the corneal surface. Arch Ophthalmol 83:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liotet S, Batellier C, Chaumeil C, Rault J (1987) Interet de l'empreinte conjonctivale en contactologie (Konjunctivale Impressionszytologie bei Kontaktlinsenanpassung). Contactologia 9D: 176–179

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marner K (1980) ‘Snakelike’ appearance of nuclear chromatin in conjunctival epithelial cells from patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Acta Ophthalmol 58:849–853

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson JD, Wright JC (1984) Conjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface disease. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1049–1051

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson JD; Wright J (1985) Impression cytology of the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. In: Holly FJ (ed) Proceedings. 1st International Tear Film Symposium, Lubbock, Texas, pp 140–156

  27. Nelson JD, Harverner VR, Cameron JD (1983) Cellulose acetate impressions of the ocular surface, dry eye states. Arch Ophthalmo1 101:1869–1883

    Google Scholar 

  28. Prause JU, Marner K (1985) Snakelike nuclear chromatin in imprints of conjunctival cells in patients with Sjögrens syndrome. In: Holly FJ (ed) Proceedings. Ist International Tear Film Symposium, Lubbock, Texas, pp 157–161

  29. Ralph RA (1975) Conjunctival goblet cell density in normal subjects and in dry eye states. Invest Ophthal 14:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robbins SL (1974) Pathologic basis of disease. Saunders, Philadelphia London Toronto, pp 1214–1221

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rohen JW (1986) Zur funktionellen Morphologie der Conjunctiva. Fortschr Ophthalmol 83:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  32. Royer J, Tabatabay C, Deschamps F (1985) Empreinte conjonctivale dans le syndrome de keratoconjonctive seche. Klin Monatsbi Augenheilkd 186:513–514

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thatcher RW, Darougar S, Jones BR (1977) Conjunctival impression cytology. Arch Ophthalmol 95:678–681

    Google Scholar 

  34. Treumer H, Corfield A, Duncker G (1986) Reaktive Veränderungen der Bindehaut und Hornhaut unter Aphakie-Dauerkontaktlinsen: Analysen der Tränenflüssigkeit. Fortschr Ophthalmol 83:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tseng SCG (1985) Staging of conjunctival sqamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology 92:728–733

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tseng SCG, Hirst LW, Maumenee AE, Kenyon KR, Sun TT, Green R (1984) Possible mechanisms for the loss of goblet cells in mucin-deficient disorders. Ophthalmology 91:545–552

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: E. Knop

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knop, E., Brewitt, H. Conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic wearers of soft contact lenses. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230, 340–347 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165942

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165942

Keywords

Navigation