Skip to main content
Log in

Division of labour in a crisis: task allocation during colony emigration in the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Division of labour during colony emigration is widespread in ants. An important problem is how tasks are allocated during colony movement from one nest site to another. The generally favoured view is that emigrations are organised by a minority group of individuals, which either work unusually hard at tasks (“elites”) or have the exclusive task of carrying out the emigration (moving specialists). Five consecutive emigrations of a Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) colony showed that the number of transporters, i.e. the individuals that took an active part in the emigration by transporting brood and ants, was smaller than it would have been if allocation of this task was random during each emigration. However, single emigrations of another three colonies, for which the spatial distribution and behaviour of the workers had been observed for a week prior to the emigration, demonstrated that the transporters did not form a homogeneous group. They differed in their spatial positions and tasks before the emigration. There was also no evidence that transporters worked harder or less hard than their nestmates before the emigration. Therefore, the individuals which carry out emigrations in L. unifasciatus colonies appear to be neither moving specialists nor “elites”. We propose that task allocation during emigrations of L. unifasciatus colonies is based on a feedback mechanism that involves learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham M, Pasteels J (1980) Social behaviour during nest-moving in the ant Myrmica rubra (L.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Soc 27:127–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker RA, Chambers JM, Wilks AR (1988) The new S language: a programming environment for data analysis and graphics. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg J-L, Goss S, Pasteels JM, Fresneau D, Lachaud J-P (1987) Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (II). Learning in foraging and division of labor. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L (eds) From individual to collective behavior in social insects (Experientia supplement 54). Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrzanska J (1973) Ethological studies on polycalic colonies of the ants Formica exsecta (Nyl.). Acta Neurobiol Exp 33: 597–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR (1985) Reproduction, foraging efficiency and worker polymorphism in army ants. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology (Fortschritte der Zoologie 31). Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Sendova-Franks AB (1992) Brood sorting by ants: distributing the workload over the work-surface. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:109–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Tofts CMN (1994) Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim Behav 48:470–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneitz G (1964) Untersuchungen zum Aufbau und zur Erhaltung des Nestwärmehaushaltes bei Formica polyctena Foerst. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Doctoral dissertation, Bayerische Julius-Maximilianus-Universität, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane AP (1977a) Recrutement et orientation chez la fourmi Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.). Rôle de la piste et des tandems. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Dijon

  • Lane AP (1977b) Tandem-running in Leptothorax unifasciatus (Formicidae, Myrmicinae): new data concerning recruitment and orientation in this species. Proceedings of VIII International Congress of IUSSI, Wageningen, pp 65–66

  • Manly BFJ (1991) Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meudec M (1977) Le comportement de transport de couvain lors d'une perturbation du nid chez Tapinoma erraticum (Dolichoderinae). Rôle de l'individu. Insectes Soc 24:345–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Meudec M, Lenoir A (1982) Social responses to variation in food supply and nest suitability in ants Tapinoma erraticum. Anim Behav 30:284–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Möglich M, Hölldobler B (1974) Social carrying behavior and division of labour during nest moving in ants. Psyche 81:219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Möglich M, Hölldobler B (1975) Communication and orientation during foraging and emigration in the ant Formica fusca. J Comp Physiol A 101:275–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ, Sokal RR (1981) Statistical tables, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneirla TC (1953) Modifiability in insect behavior. In: Roeder KD (ed) Insect physiology. Wiley, New York, pp 723–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull Math Biol 55:75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1994) Social resilience in individual worker ants and its role in division of labour. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1995) Spatial relationships within nests of the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) and their implications for the division of labour. Anim Behav (in press)

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Theraulaz G, Goss S, Gervet J, Deneubourg J-L (1990) Task differentiation in Polistes wasp colonies: a model for self-organizing groups of robots. In: Mayer JA, Wilson S (eds) Simulation of animal behavior: from animals to animats. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 346–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofts C (1993) Algorithms for task allocation in ants. (A study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55:891–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7:346–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Topoff HR, Mirenda J (1980) Army ants on the move: relation between food supply and emigration frequency. Science 207: 1099–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Topoff HR, LaMon B, Goodloe L, Goldstein M (1984) Social and orientation behavior of Polyergus breviceps during slave-making raids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1980) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta), I: The overall pattern in A. sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:143–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R.F.A. Moritz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sendova-Franks, A.B., Franks, N.R. Division of labour in a crisis: task allocation during colony emigration in the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36, 269–282 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165836

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165836

Key words

Navigation