Skip to main content
Log in

Travel demand model system for the information era

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of new information technologies and recent advances in existing technologies have provided new dimensions for travel demand decisions. In this paper we propose a comprehensive travel demand modeling framework to identify and model the urban development decisions of firms and developers and the mobility, activity and travel decisions of individuals and households, and to develop a system of models that can be used by decision makers and planners to evaluate the effects of changes in the transportation system and development of information technologies (e.g. various tele-commuting, tele-services and Intelligent Transportation Systems).

The implementation of an operational model system based on this framework is envisioned as an incremental process starting with the current “best practice” of disaggregate travel demand model systems. To this end, we present an activity-based model system as the first stage in the development of an operational model system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler JL, Recker WW & McNally M (1992) A Conflict Model and Interactive Simulator (FASTCARS) for Predicting Enroute Assessment and Adjustment Behavior in Response to Real-Time. Traffic Condition Information. Transportation Research Board, 71th Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler T & Ben-Akiva M (1979) A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior. Transportation Research 13B: 243–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antonisse RW, Daly A & Gunn H (1986) The primary destination tour approach to modeling trip chains. In Transportation Planning Methods: PTRC Proceedings of Seminar M.

  • Aptech Systems (1993) GAUSS: User's Guide. Tech. rep., Aptech Systems, Inc.

  • Axhausen KW, Ayerbe A, Bannelier M, Berkum EV, Billotte M, Goodwin PG, Herry M, Katteler H, Mede PVD, Meurs H, Polak JW, Schwazmann R, Selva D, Yune A & Zumkeller D (1991) EUROTOPP — Towards a dynamic and activity-based modeling framework. In Advanced Telematics in Road Transport: Proceedings of DRIVE Conference, pp 1021–1039.

  • Bailyn L (1989) Toward the perfect workplace? Communications of the ACM 32(4): 460–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M (1973) Structure of Passenger Demand Models. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT.

  • Ben-Akiva M, Cyna M & de Palma A (1984) Dynamic models of peak period congestion. Transportation Research 18B(4,5): 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Sherman L & Kullman B (1978) Disaggregate model of non-home based travel. Transportation Research Record 673.

  • Ben-Akiva ME (1977) Choice models with simple choice set feneration processes. Tech. rep., Department of Civil Engineering.

  • Ben-Akiva ME & Boccara B (1995) Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. To appear in International Journal of Research in Marketing.

  • Ben-Akiva ME & Bolduc D (1991) Multinomial probit with autoregressive error structure. Tech. rep., Department of Economics, Unversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva ME, Bolduc D & Bradley M (1993) Estimation of travel choice models with randomly distributed values of time. Transportation Research Record 1413.

  • Ben-Akiva ME, Bradley M, Morikawa T, Benjamin J, Novak T, Oppewal H & Rao V (1994) Combining revealed and stated preference data. forthcoming in a special issue of Marketing Letters.

  • Ben-Akiva ME, de Palma A & Kaysi I (1991) Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transportation Research 25A(5): 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva ME & Lerman S (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand. MIT Series in Transportation Studies. The MIT Press.

  • Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman S, Damm D, Jacobson J, Pitschke S, Weisbrod G & Wolfe R (1980) Understanding, prediction and evaluation of transportation related consumer behavior. Tech. rep., Prepared for: Office of University Research, Research and Special Programs Administration, US Department of Transportation.

  • Ben-Akiva ME & Moriwaka T (1990) Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Yokohama, Japan.

  • Bernardino A, Ben-Akiva ME & Salomon I (1993) A stated preference approach to modeling the adoption of telecommuting. Transportation Research Record 1413.

  • Bovy PH & Stem E (1990) Route Choice: Wayfinding in Transport Networks. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Damm D (1983) Theory and empirical results: a comparison of recent activity-based research. In: Carpenter S & Jones P (ed) Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis (pp 3–3). England: Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon W, Kumar A & de Borrero MS (1993) Capturing individual differences in paired comparisions: An extended BTL model incorporating descriptor variables. Journal of Marketing Research 30: 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS (1984) An Introduction to Latent Variable Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman and Hall.

  • Golob T (1986) A nonlinear canonical correlation analysis of weekly trip chaining behavior. Transportation Research A 20A: 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath D & Ben-Akiva M (1993) Latent Class Choice Model. Working Paper.

  • Goulias K & Kitamura R (1992) Travel Demand Forecasting with Dynamic Microsimulation. Tech. rep., Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-92-4, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis.

  • Hagerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science. Papers of the Regional Science Association 24.

  • Hamer R, Kroes E & Ooststroom HV (1991) Teleworking in the Netherlands: An evaluation of changes in travel behaviour. Transportation 18(4): 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • HCG (1992) ALOGIT: User's Guide. Tech. rep., Hague Consulting Group.

  • HCG (1992) The National Model System for Traffic and Transport. Tech. rep., Hague, The Netherlands: Hague Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh M, Prashker J & Ben-Akiva M (1986) Dynamic model of weekly acitivity pattern. Transportation Science 20: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakrishnan R & Mahmassani S (1991) A dynamic modeling framework of real-time guidance systems in general urban traffic networks. In: Stephanides YJ & Sinha KC (ed) Proc. of the Second International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation Engineering.

  • Kamakura WA & Russel GJ (1989) A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research 25: 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattak AJ, Koppehnan FS & Schofer JL (1992) Stated Preferences for Investigating Commuters' Diversion Propensity. Transportation Research Board, 71th Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R (1984) Sequential, history dependent approach to trip-chaining behavior. Transportation Research Record 944: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R & Kermanshah M (1984) A sequential model of interdependent activity and destination choice. Tranportation Research Record 987: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman F & Pas E (1985) Travel-activity behavior in time and space: Methods for representation and analysis: 587–627.

  • Koppelman F & Townsend TA (1987) Task Allocation among Household Members: Theory and Analysis. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Travel Behavior, Aix-en-Provence, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut RE & Grambsch P (1985) Prophecy by Analogy: Potential Causes for and Consequences of Electronic Homework. Tech. rep., Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman S (1979) The use of disaggregate choice models in semi-markov process models of trip chaining behavior. Transportation Science 13: 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotan T & Koutsopoulos H (1994) Models for route choice behavior in the presence of information using concepts from fuzzy set theory and approximate reasoning. Transportation 21.

  • McFadden D (1989) A method of simulated moments for estimation of the multinomial probit without numerical integration. Econometrica 57.

  • Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (1995) Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting 3: Identifying the Choice Set and Estimating Binary Choice Models for Technology-Based Alternatives. Submitted to Environment and Planning A.

  • Nishii K, Kondo K & Kitamura R (1988) Empirical analysis of trip chaining behavior. Tranportation Research Record 1203: 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson MH & Primps SB (1984) Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues. Journal of Social Issues 40(3): 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pas EI (1983) A flexible and integrated methodology for analytical classification of daily travel-activity behavior. Transportation Science 17: 405–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pas EI (1984) The effect of selected sociodemographic characteristics on daily travel-activity behavior. Environment and Planning A 16: 571–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pas EI (1985) State of the art and research opportunities in travel demand. Tranportation Research A 19A: 460–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendyala RM, Goulias KG & Kitamura R (1991) Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel. Transportation 18(4): 383–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polydoropoulou A, Ben-Akiva M & Kaysi I (1994) Influence of traffic information on drivers' route choice behavior. Transportation Research Record 1453: 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JH (1984) Home teleworking: A study of its pioneers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 25: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker WW, McNally MG & Root G (1987) An empirical analysis of urban activity patterns. Geographical Analysis 19: 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker WW, McNally MG & Root GS (1985) Travel/activity analysis: pattern recognition, classification and interpretation. Transportation Research A 19A: 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker WW, McNally MG & Root GS (1986) A model of complex travel bBehavior: Part II — An operational model. Transportation Research A 20A(4).

  • Ruiter E & Ben-Akiva M (1978) Disaggregate travel demand models for the San Francisco area. Transportation Research Record 673: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon I (1985) Telecommunications and travel - substitution or modified mobility. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 19: 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan MA, Mahmassani HS, Yen J-R (1993) A choice model of employee participation in yelecommuting under a cost-neutral scenario. Transportation Research Record 1413: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swait J & Ben-Akiva M (1987) Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation. Transportation Research 2113(2): 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train K (1986) Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand. The MIT Press.

  • van der Hoorn AUM (1983) An Empirical Model of Travel and Activity Choice: A Case Study for The Netherlands. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Zenor M & Srivastava RK (1993) Inferrring market structure with aggregate data: A latent segment logit approach. Journal of Marketing Research 30.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Akivai, M., Bowman, J.L. & Gopinath, D. Travel demand model system for the information era. Transportation 23, 241–266 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165704

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165704

Keywords

Navigation