Skip to main content
Log in

Covering one eye in fixation-disparity measurement causes slight movement of fellow eye

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the subjective measurement of fixation disparity (FD), the subject fuses contours presented in the peripheral macular areas of both eyes (fusion lock). The position of the eyes relative to each other is monitored by means of two haploscopically seen vertical lines presented in the central macular area, one above and one below a binocularly seen horizontal line. The subject is instructed to shift one of the vertical lines horizontally until the two are aligned, while fixating their intersection with the horizontal line. It has recently been questioned whether the foveolae really are pointed towards the perceived intersection. In this study, we monitored the position of one eye while intermittently covering the fellow eye, while the subject maintained fixation of the intersection of the remaining vertical line and the horizontal line. We found slight differences in position of the measured eye, depending on whether the other eye was covered or not, i.e. depending on the presence or absence of fusion in the macular periphery. These differences were more pronounced in the non-dominant eye.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Panum PL. In: Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen. Kiel, 1858.

  2. Schor CM. The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity. Vis Res 1979; 19: 757–765.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schor CM. Fixation disparity: a steady state error of disparity-induced vergence. Am J Opt & Physiol Optics 1980; 57: 618–631.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ogle KN, Mussey F, Prangen A de H. Fixation disparity and the fusional processes in single binocular vision. Am J Ophthalmol 1949; 32: 1069–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ogle KN. In: Researches in binocular vision. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ogel KN, Prangen A de H. (1951) Further considerations of fixation disparity and the binocular fusional processes. Am J Ophthalmol 1951; 34: 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ogle KN, Martens TG, Dyer JA. In: Oculomotor imbalance in binocular vision and fixation disparity. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jampolsky A. Esotropia and convergent fixation disparity. Am J Ophthalmol 1956; 41: 825–833.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jampolsky A, Flom BC, Freid AN. Fixation disparity in relation to heterophoria. Am J Ophthalmol 1957; 43: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crone RA. A new theory about heterophoria. Ophthalmologica 1971; 162: 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer EA, von Noorden GK. The relationship between fixation disparity and heterophoria. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 86: 172–175.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haase HJ. Fixationsdisparation: Eine erweiterte Theorie und praktische Folgerungen. Der Augenoptiker 1980; 3: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pestalozzi D. Über die Behandlung von heterophoren Legasthenikern mit Fixationsdisparation mittels Prismenvollkorrektion. Klin Mbl Augenh 1986; 188: 471–473.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hebbard FW. Comparison of subjective and objective measurements of fixation disparity. J Opt Soc America 1962; 52: 706–712.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kertesz AE, Hampton DR, Sabrin HW. The unreliability of nonius line estimates of vertical fusional vergence performance (letter). Vis Res 1983; 23: 295–297.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kertesz AE, Lee HJ. The nature of sensory compensation during fusional response. Vis Res 1988; 28: 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schor CM, Wesson M, Robertson KM. Combined effects of spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity upon fixation disparity. Am J Opt & Physiol Optics 1986; 63: 619–626.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irving EL, Robertson KM. Monocular components of fixation disparity: the effects of monocular image degradation. Invest Ophthalmol 1990; 31 (ARVO Supplement): 95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bourdy C, Cottin-Lemerle F. La disparité de fixation: variations des composantes monoculaires en fonction de la distance d'observation. Annales Oculist (Paris) 1971; 204: 697–730.

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Decker W, Scheffel T. Simultaneous investigation of fixation disparity, stereo threshold and horopter balance. Graefes Arch klin experim Ophthalmol 1978; 207: 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bour LJ, van Gisbergen JAM, Bruijns J, Ottes FP. The double magnetic induction method for measuring eye movements - results in monkey and man. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1984; BME-31, 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carter DB. Studies in fixation disparity. Am J Opt Arch Am & Acad Optometry 1960; 37: 408–419.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mastronarde DN, Thibeault MA, Dubin MW. Non-uniform postnatal growth of the cat retina. J Comp Neurol 1984; 228: 598–608.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milleret C, Buisseret P, Gary-Bobo E. Area centralis position relative to the optic disc projection in kittens as a function of age. Invest Ophthalmol 1988; 29: 1299–1305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presented in part at the Fifth European Conference on Eye Movements, Pavia, September 1989, at the 15th Seminar Week of the Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands, Arbeitskreis Schielen, Munster, June 1989 and at the meeting of the Schweizerische Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft, Crans Montana, September 1990.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simonsz, H.J., Bour, L.J. Covering one eye in fixation-disparity measurement causes slight movement of fellow eye. Doc Ophthalmol 78, 141–152 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165674

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165674

Key words

Navigation