Skip to main content
Log in

Interactive sensitivity analysis in transportation plan evaluation

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental technique for exploring the sensitivity of transportation plan evaluations to forecasting and community value uncertainties is described. Three kinds of uncertainty — goal-achievement impacts, costs, and goal-weights — are included. Within a cost-effectiveness evaluation framework, an “on-line” capability for interactively and iteratively testing plan comparisons is outlined. A series of user-oriented computer instructions is developed to test plan comparison outcomes according to a wide variety of user-selected changes in impact forecasts, goal weights, and cost forecasts. A sample, hypothetical application of the technique is described. The technique is currently under further development by the San Diego Region Comprehensive Planning Organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton-Aschman Associates (1972). Plan Evaluation and Selection Process, San Diego Region Comprehensive Planning Organization, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen Associates (1973). Transportation Plan Evaluation Process, Southern California Association of Governments, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highway Research Board (1973). Application of Interactive Graphics to Transportation System Planning, Highway Research Record 455 (4 reports).

  • Hill, M. (1968). “A Goals-Achievement Matrix for Evaluating Alternative Plans,” AIP Journal, XXXIV (January), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. and Stuart, D. G. (1973). “Interactive Sensitivity Analyses of Alternative Regional Plans,” presented at Confer-In 1973, American Institute of Planners, October.

  • Kamnitzer, P., (1969). “Computer Aid to Design,” Architectural Design (May), 507–509.

  • Oglesby, C. H., Bishop, B. and Willeke, G. E., (1970). “A Method for Decision Among Freeway Location Alternatives based upon User and Community Consequences,” Highway Research Record. 305, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Diego Region Comprehensive Planning Organization (1973). Priorities Among Regional Goals and Objectives, November.

  • San Diego Region Comprehensive Planning Organization (1972). Regional Development: Issues and Alternatives (2 vols.), September.

  • San Diego Region Comprehensive Planning Organization (1972). The Regional Model System, April.

  • San Diego Regional Goals Committee (1972). Goals and Objectives for the San Diego Region, November.

  • Schneider, J. B. (1974). Interactive Graphics in Transportation Systems Planning and Design, University of Washington, January.

  • Schofer, J. L. and Stuart, D. G., (1974). “Evaluating Regional Plans and Community Impacts,” Journal of the Urban Planning Division, ASCE, Vol. 100 (March), 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutsch, M. and Schofer, J. L., (1973). “Goals Delphis for Urban Planning: Concepts in Their Design,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, D. G., (1969). “Rational Urban Planning: Problems and Prospects,” Urban Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 5 (December), 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. N. and Schofer, J. L. (1970). Strategies for the Evaluation of Alternative Transportation Plans, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 96, Highway Research Board.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stuart, D.G. Interactive sensitivity analysis in transportation plan evaluation. Transportation 3, 289–310 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165491

Keywords

Navigation