Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Female choice and the quality of parental care in the great tit Parus major

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Previous work on great tits suggested that female mate choice was based on the characteristics of the male rather than the quality of his territory. The aim of this paper was to see whether females were deriving any direct benefits as a result of such choice by comparing male plumage colouration (the size of the central black breast-stripe) with the quality of parental care provided by both members of the pair. Males with large stripes were more likely to defend their broods because their nest attentiveness was higher increasing the chances of predator detection. Males with large stripes produced heavier fledglings primarily as a result of faster growth early in the nestling period. Previous work on great tits has shown that heavier fledglings have a higher survival probability than lighter ones. The results of this study can more easily be explained by differences in parental quality between males rather than as a result of variation in female or territory quality. Therefore, female great tits could increase their reproductive success by pairing with males with a large stripe because such males appear to be better quality parents. This suggests that female choice in the great tit may concern, at least in part, the quality of male parental care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Gottlander K, Lundberg A (1988) Conflict or cooperation between parents in feeding nestlings in the pied flycatcher. Ornis Scand 19:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1982a) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1982b) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol J Linn Soc 17:375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on heritable viability differences. Evolution 40:804–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage P, Berry G (1987) Statistical methods in medical research, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ (1983) Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann GC, Sealy SG (1982) Parental feeding of nestling yellow warblers in relation to brood size and prey availability. Auk 99:332–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Andersson M (eds) (197) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester

  • Breiwisch R, Merritt P, Whitesides GH (1986) Parental investment by Northern mockingbirds: male and female roles in feeding nestlings. Auk 103:152–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson A, Moreno J (1986) Foraging behaviour and parental care in the fieldfare. Ardea 74:79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn E (1977) Predation by weasels (Mustela nivalis) on breeding tits (Parus spp.) in relation to the density of tits and rodents. J Anim Ecol 46:633–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb JA, Betts MM (1963) Food and food supply of nestling great tits in Breckland pine. J Anim Ecol 32:489–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant BR, Grant PR (1987) Mate choice in Darwin's finches. Biol J Linn Soc 32:247–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith P (1980) Parental investment in nest defence by stonechats Saxicola torquata. Anim Behav 28:604–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundel R (1987) Determinants of nestling feeding rates and parental investment in the mountain chickadee. Condor 89:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright plumage in birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde RA (1952) The behaviour of the great tit (Parus major) and some related species. Behaviour (Suppl) 11: 1–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzer GA (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvi T, Roskaft E, Bakken M, Zumsteg B (1987) Evolution of variation in male secondary sexual characters: a test of eight hypotheses applied to the pied flycatcher. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EJ, Best LB (1982) Factors affecting feeding and brooding of Gray catbird nestlings. Auk 99:148–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (1987a) Parent-offspring resource allocation in swallows during nestling rearing: an experimental study. Ardea 75:145–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (1987b) Parental foraging ecology and feeding behaviour during nestling rearing in the swallow. Ardea 75:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluijver HN (1950) Daily routines of the great tit, Parus m. major L. Ardea 38:99–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection of polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffelaar D, Robertson RJ (1986) Equality of feeding roles and the maintenance of monogamy in tree swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld IT, Slagsvold T (1986) The function of courtship feeding during incubation in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 34:1441–1453

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1988a) Female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca choose male characteristics in homogeneous habitat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1988b) Mate fidelity of renesting pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to the characteristics of the pair mates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon BE, Mongomeri RD (1985) Incubation feeding in snow buntings: female manipulation or indirect male parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon BE, Montgomerie RD, Hamilton LD (1987) Male parental care and monogamy in the snow bunting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith J (1985) Sexual selection, handicaps and true fitness. J Theor Biol 115:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller AP (1988) Female choice selects for male tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332:640–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller AP (1990) Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallow Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 39:458–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse EL, Brewer R (1968) Feeding of nestling and fledgling Eastern kingbirds. Auk 85:44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J, Smith HG (1988) Incubation feeding as a male tactic for early hatching. Anim Behav 36:641–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris KJ (1989) Evolutionary aspects of the plumage colouration of great tits. Unpubl D Phil Thesis, University of Oxford

  • Norris KJ (1990) Female choice and the evolution of the conspicuous plumage colouration of monogamous male great tits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:129–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Harvey PH (1986) Contentious issues in sexual selection. Nature 323:580–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM (1965) Population fluctuations and clutch size in the great tit Parus major L. J Anim Ecol 34:601–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM (1979) British tits. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettifor RA (1989) Individual clutch size variation in tits. Unpubl D Phil Thesis, University of Oxford

  • Pettifor RA, Perrins CM, McCleery RH (1988) Individual optimization of clutch size in great tits. Nature 336:160–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkowski BC (1978) Feeding of nestling and fledgling Eastern bluebirds. Wilson Bull 90:84–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama T (1966) Factors governing feeding rate, food requirment and brood size of nestling great tits (Parus major). Wilson Bull 108:313–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasvari L (1986) Reproductive effort of widowed birds. J Anim Ecol 55:553–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel DC (1969) Food, feeding rate and body temperature in the nestling house sparrow Passer domesticus in Oxford. J Anim Ecol 111:36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Seger J (1985) Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution 39:1185–1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Kallander H, Fontell K, Ljungstrom M (1988) Feeding frequency and parental division of labour in the double-brooded great tit Parus major: effects of manipulating brood size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:447–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens TA, Krebs JR (1986) Retrieval of stored seeds by marsh tits Parus palustris in the field. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 128: 513–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF (1982) Factors affecting how male and female bobolinks apportion parental investment. Condor 84:22–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, South Parks Road, OX1 3PS, Oxford, UK

    K. J. Norris

Authors
  1. K. J. Norris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norris, K.J. Female choice and the quality of parental care in the great tit Parus major . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27, 275–281 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164900

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164900

Keywords

Search

Navigation