Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 278–282 | Cite as

Role of cell attachment in leaching of chalcopyrite mineral by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans

  • Shrihari
  • R. Kumar
  • K. S. Gandhi
  • K. A. Natarajan
Environmental biotechnology

Summary

Experiments on the leaching of copper from chalcopyrite mineral by the bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans show that, in the presence of adequate amounts of sulphide, iron-grown bacteria preferentially oxidise sulphur in the ore (through direct attachment) rather than ferrous sulphate in solution. At 20% pulp density, the leaching initially takes place by a predominantly direct mechanism. The cell density in the liquid phase increases, but the Fe2+ is not oxidised. However, in the later stages when less solid substrate is available and the cell density becomes very high, the bacteria start oxidising Fe2+ in the liquid phase, thus contributing to the indirect mechanism of leaching. Contrary to expectations, the rate of leaching increased with increasing particle size in spite of the decreasing specific surface area. This has been found to be due to increasing attachment efficiency with increase in particle size.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck JV, Brown DG (1968) Direct sulphide oxidation in the solubilisation of sulphide ores by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol 96:1433–1434Google Scholar
  2. Blankarte-Zurita MA, Branion RMR (1986) Particle size effects in microbial leaching of sulphide concentrates by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:751–755Google Scholar
  3. Brierley CL (1976) Bacterial leaching. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 206:207–260Google Scholar
  4. Dutrizac JE, McDonald RJC (1974) Ferric ion as a leaching medium. Min Sci Eng 6:59–100Google Scholar
  5. Ehrlich HL, Fox SL (1967) Environmental effects on bacterial copper extraction from low grade copper sulphide ores. Biotechnol Bioeng 9:471–485Google Scholar
  6. Espejo RT, Ruiz P (1987) Growth of free and attached Thiobacillus ferrooxidans in ore suspension. Biotechnol Bioeng 30:586–592Google Scholar
  7. Gormely LS, Duncan DW, Branion RMR, Pinder KL (1975) Continuous culture of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on a zinc sulphide concentrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 17:31–49Google Scholar
  8. Lizama HM, Suzuki I (1988) Bacterial leaching of a sulphide ore by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: I. Shake flask studies. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:110–116Google Scholar
  9. Razell WE, Trussel PC (1963) Isolation and properties of iron oxidising Yhiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol 85:595–603Google Scholar
  10. Sakaguchi H, Torma AE, Silver M (1967) Microbiological oxidation of synthetic chalcocite and covalite by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:7–10Google Scholar
  11. Shrihari, Kumar R, Gandhi KS (1990) Modelling of Fe2+ oxidation by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:524–528Google Scholar
  12. Silverman MP, Lundgren DG (1959) Studies on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. I. An improved medium and a harvesting procedure for securing high cellular yields. J Bacteriol 77:642–647Google Scholar
  13. Torma AE, (1986) The role of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans in hydrometallurgical processes. Adv Biochem Eng 6:1–37Google Scholar
  14. Torma AE, Walden CC, Duncan DW, Branion RMR (1972) The effect of carbon dioxide and particle surface area on the microbiological leaching of a zinc sulphide concentrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 14:777–786Google Scholar
  15. Vogel AI (1961) A textbook of quantitative inorganic analysis, 3rd edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shrihari
    • 1
  • R. Kumar
    • 1
  • K. S. Gandhi
    • 1
  • K. A. Natarajan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of MetallurgyIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations