Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial organization and mating system of Microtus townsendii

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Space use by individual Townsend's voles, Microtus townsendii, was investigated in spring and summer by means of radiotelemetry and intensive live trapping in undisturbed grasslands near Vancouver, British Columbia. Home ranges of males were larger than those of females; females had significantly larger ranges in spring than in summer. Most males and females maintained territories free of individuals of the same sex in spring. Male-female pairs had their exclusive territories closely overlapping each other. The 1:1 operational sex ratio and the spatial association of pairs of males and females suggest that the voles were monogamous in the spring of 1988 and that 50% of the males were monogamous in the spring of 1989. In summer, there was more intrasexual overlap between home ranges of males and females and female ranges were considerably smaller than those of males. Females were more philopatric than males and females thought to be members of the same family group lived adjacent to each other or had overlapping home ranges. Males overlapped with more than one female in summer, but most females still overlapped with only one male, which suggests that the mating system is polygynous in summer. Thirty-five percent of the philopatric females became pregnant for the first time when the male spatially associated with their mother in the spring was still alive and thus could potentially have mated with their fathers. Male and female territoriality in spring is the proximate mechanism for the limitation of breeding density by spacing behaviour.[/p]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agren G, Zhou Q, Zhong W (1989) Ecology and social behaviour of the Mongolian gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus, at Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, China. Anim Behav 37:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson PK (1989) Dispersal in rodents: a resident fitness hypothesis. Spec Publ Am Soc Mammal 9:1–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Beacham TD (1979) Dispersal tendency and duration of life of littermates during population fluctuations of the vole Microtus townsendii. Oecologia (Berlin) 42:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondrup-Nielsen S (1986) Investigation of spacing behaviour of Clethrionomys gapperi by experimentation. J Anim Ecol 55:269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondrup-Nielsen S, Karlsson F (1985) Movements and spatial patterns in populations of Clethrionomys species: a review. Ann Zool Fenn 22:385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Krebs CJ (1977) A fencing experiment on a high-density population of Microtus townsendii. Can J Zool 55:1166–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Rodd FH (1983) Regulation of breeding density in Microtus pennsylvanicus. J Anim Ecol 52:757–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Krebs CJ, Beacham TD (1980) Impact of botfly parasitism on Microtus townsendii populations. Can J Zool 58:1683–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Krebs CJ, Gaines MS, Johnson ML, Craine ITM (1987) Natal philopatry and breeding systems in voles (Microtus spp.). J Anim Ecol 56:655–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Bujalska G (1973) The role of spacing behavior among females in the regulation of reproduction in the bank vole. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 19:465–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Finerty JP (1980) Vole population cycles: a case for kin-selection. Oecologia 45:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty D (1987) Social and local environments of the vole Microtus townsendii. Can J Zool 65:2555–2566

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals. Nature 337:70–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A (1988) Social organization in fluctuating populations. Croon Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson BJ, Johnson ML, Gaines MS (1986) An analysis of a method for comparing residents and colonists in a natural population of Microtus ochrogaster. J Mammal 67:733–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Desy EA, Batzli GO, Jike L (1989) Comparison of vole movements assessed by live trapping and radiotracking. J Mammal 70:652–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueser RD, Rose RK, Porter JH (1984) A body-weight criterion to identify dispersing small mammals. J Mammal 65:727–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S, Agrell J, Nelson J, Sandell M (1989) Social organization and population dynamics in a field vole (Microtus agrestis) population in southern Sweden. Abstract of papers and posters, vol 1: 78. Fifth International Theriological Congress Rome 1989

  • Fitzgerald RW, Madison DM (1983) Social organization of a free-ranging population of pine voles. Microtus pinetorum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank F (1957) The causality of microtine cycles in Germany. J Wildl Manage 21:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz LL, Hofmann JE (1986) Social organization in free living prairie voles Microtus ochrogaster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:275–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz LL, Dluzen D, McDermott JL (1983) Suppression of reproductive maturation in male-stimulated virgin female Microtus by a urinary chemosignal. Behav Processes 8:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz LL, Hofmann JE, Carter CS (1987) Mating system and population fluctuations in the prairie vole Microtus ochrogaster. Am Zool 27:909–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert BS, Krebs CJ, Talarico D, Cichowski DB (1986) Do Clethrionomys rutilus females suppress maturation of juvenile females? J Anim Ecol 55:543–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1989) Individuals and populations of the bank vole in optimal, suboptimal and insular habitats. J Anim Ecol 58:237–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestbeck JB (1982) Population regulation of cyclic mammals: the social fence hypothesis. Oikos 39:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Heske EJ (1987) Spatial structuring and dispersal in a high density population of the California vole, Microtus californicus. Holarctic Ecol 10:137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R (1975) Similarities in dispersal tendency among siblings in four species of voles (Microtus). Ecology 56:1221–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Ims RA (1987a) Male spacing systems in microtine rodents. Am Nat 130:475–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Ims RA (1987b) Responses in spatial organization and behaviour to manipulations of the food resource in the vole Clethrionomys rufocanus. J Anim Ecol 56:585–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Ims RA (1988) Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles. Nature 335:541–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Ims RA, Bondrup-Nielsen S, Stenseth NC (1988) Temporal patterns of breeding events in small rodent populations. Oikos 53:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannett FJ (1978) The density-dependent formation of extended maternal families of the montane vole, Microtus montanus nanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:245–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann JH (1983) On the definitions and functions of dominance and territoriality. Biol Rev 58:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawata M (1985) Mating system and reproductive success in a spring population of the red-backed vole thrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae. Oikos 45:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE (1987) Wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman D (1977) Monogamy in mammals. Q Rev Biol 52:39–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1979) Dispersal, spacing behaviour, and genetics in relation to population fluctuations in the vole Microtus townsendii. Fortschr Zool 25:61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1985) Do changes in spacing behaviour drive population cycles in small mammals? In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. Symp Br Ecol Soc 25:295–312

  • Krebs CJ, Boonstra R (1978) Demography of the spring decline in populations of the vole Microtus townsendii. J Anim Ecol 47:1007–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ, Wingate I, Leduc J, Redfield JA, Taitt M, Hilborn R (1976) Microtus population biology: dispersal in fluctuating populations of M. townsendii. Can J Zool 54:79–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ, Redfield JA, Taitt M (1978) A pulsed-removal experiment on the vole Microtus townsendii. Can J Zool 56:2253–2262

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison DM (1980) Space use and social structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire MR, Getz LL (1981) Incest taboo between sibling Microtus ochrogaster. J Mammal 62:213–215

    Google Scholar 

  • McShea WJ, Madison DM (1984) Communal nesting between reproductively active females in a spring population of Microtus pennsylvanicus. Can J Zool 62:344–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Myllymäki A (1977) Intraspecific competition and home range dynamics in the field vole Microtus agrestis. Oikos 29:553–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS (1985) Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. Am Nat 126:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS (1986) Territoriality and mating system of California voles. J Anim Ecol 55:691–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh SR, Tamarin RH (1988) Inbreeding in a population of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Can J Zool 66:1831–1834

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield JA, Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1978a) Experimental alterations of sex ratios in populations of Microtus oregoni, the creeping vole. J Anim Ecol 47:55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield JA, Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1978b) Experimental alterations of sex ratios in populations of Microtus townsendii, a field vole. Can J Zool 56:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh T (1981) Control of female maturation in high density populations of the red-backed vole Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae. J Anim Ecol 50:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni M (1988) Home range and social behavior of three species of European Pitymys (Mammalia, Rodentia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni M, Lidicker WZ (1989) Seasonal and sexual effects on territoriality in the California vole. Abstract of papers and posters, vol 1:99. Fifth International Theriological Congress, Rome 1989

  • Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1981) The effect of extra food on small rodent populations: II. Voles (Microtus townsendii). J Anim Ecol 50:125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1982) Manipulation of female behaviour in field populations of Microtus townsendii. J Anim Ecol 51:681–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1983) Predation, cover, and food manipulations during a spring decline of Microtus townsendii. J Anim Ecol 52:837–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1985) Population dynamics and cycles. Spec Publ Am Soc Mammal 8:567–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamarin RH (1984) Body mass as a criterion of dispersal in voles: a critique. J Mammal 65:691–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamarin RH, Sheridan M (1987) Sibship assignment and massdefined recruitment in a population of meadow voles. Ecology 68:1102–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Birney EC (1979) Parental care and mating system of the prairie vole Microtus ochrogaster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO (1985) Behaviour. Spec Publ Am Soc Mammal 8:340–372

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: C.J. Krebs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambin, X., Krebs, C.J. Spatial organization and mating system of Microtus townsendii . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28, 353–363 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164385

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164385

Keywords

Navigation