Skip to main content
Log in

Tit for tat among neighboring hooded warblers

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The “dear-enemy” relationship of territorial songbirds could be mutually beneficial to neighbors, as males who recognize neighbors and reduce their responses to these neighbors would require less time and energy for territorial defense. In order for this relationship to be evolutionarily stable, this reduction in response to a neighbor must be conditional on reciprocal restraint by that neighbor. This study examined the possibility of such conditional responses in hooded warblers (Wilsonia citrina). Responses of territorial hooded warblers to playbacks of neighbors' songs from shared boundaries were measured before and after playbacks that simulated intrusions of those same neighbors (NNNN treatment) or strange birds (NSSN treatment) into the subjects' territories. Each male received both treatments separated by at least 8 days. Males increased their responses to playbacks of a neighbor's songs at the boundary after simulated intrusions of that same neighbor (NNNN) but did not increase their responses to such playbacks after simulated intrusions of strangers (NSSN). This increased response to a “defecting” neighbor suggests that the relationship between neighboring territorial hooded warblers is based on a conditional strategy like tit-for-tat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley E (1991) Response of European robins to playbacks of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping. Anim Behav 53:1412–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney D, Seyfarth R (1990) How monkeys see the world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Falls JB (1982) Individual recognition by sounds in birds. In: Kroodsma D, Miller E (eds) Acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, New York, pp 237–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Falls JB, Brooks R (1975) Individual recongition by song in white-throated sparrows. II. Effects of location. Can J Zool 59:2380–2385

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J (1954) Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy A, Ford E (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox SF, Baird TA (1992) The dear enemy phenomenon in the collared lizard Crotaphytus collaris, with a cautionary not on experimental methodology. Anim Behav 44:780–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty T (1987) Dear enemies and the prisoner's dilemma: why should territorial neighbors form defensive coalition? Am Zool 27:327–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty T (1989) Are dear enemies in a war of attrition? Anim Behav 37:337–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard R (1991) Long-term memory of neighbors in a migratory songbird. Nature 350:228–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig WD (1988) Reciprocal altruism in birds: A critical review. Ethol Sociobiol 23:395–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo MP (1985) Mutual restraint in tree swallows: an experimental test of the TIT for TAT model of reciprocity. Science 227:1363–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo MP (1990) Tree swallows and TIT FOR TAT. Ethol Sociobiol 11:521–528

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Avery MI (1986) The unsung songs of great tits (Parus major): learning neighbours' songs for discrimination. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1992) Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature 355:250–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1984) Evolutionarily stable strategies. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology. Sinauer, Massachusetts, pp 30–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualls CP, Jaeger RG (1991) Dear enemy recognition in Anolis carolinensis. J Herpetol 25:361–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein S, Pierotti R (1988) Distinctions among reciprocal altruism, kin selection, and cooperation and a model for the initial evolution of beneficent behavior. Ethol Sociobiol 9:189–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector D (1992) Wood-warbler song systems. In DM Power (ed) Current ornithology vol 9. Plenum Press, pp 199–238

  • Stoddard P, Beecher M, Horning C, Campbell S (1991) Recognition of individual neighbors by song in the song sparrow, a species with song repertoires. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin Cummings, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Wiley MS (1977) Recognition of neighbors' duets by stripe-backed wrens, Campylorhynchus nuchalis. Behavior 62:10–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS (1988) Reciprocal altruism in bats and other mammals. Ethol Sociobiol 23:85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Giraldeau LA, Falls JB (1988) Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim Behav 36:433–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Giraldeau LA, Falls JB (1989) Remarks on Getty's “Fighting to learn” hypothesis. Anim Behav 37:336–337

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godard, R. Tit for tat among neighboring hooded warblers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33, 45–50 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164345

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164345

Keywords

Navigation