Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 27–31 | Cite as

Testes size and breeding systems in Japanese annrans with special reference to large testes in the treefrog, Rhacophorus arboreus (Amphibia : Rhacophoridae)

  • Tamotsu Kusano
  • Mitsuhiko Toda
  • Kinji Fukuyama
Article

Summary

Testes size was compared among 19 species of Japanese anurans in relation to their breeding systems. Although the mean body mass of the species examined varied markedly between 1.8 and 116 g, the mean proportion of testes mass to body mass was fairly constant at 0.2 to 0.4% across all species except the rhacophorid species. Foam-nest building rhacophorids had relatively large testes constituting more than 1% of their body mass. Among them, Rhacophorus arboreus had the largest, exceeding 5% of the body mass. Multi-male breeding, where a female is grasped by two or more males during spawning, occurs frequently in these rhacophorids, especially in R. arboreus. This close association between large testes size and multi-male breeding strongly suggests that sperm competition is an important factor affecting the evolution of relative testes size in Japanese anurans.

Keywords

Special Reference Close Association Sperm Competition Breeding System Testis Mass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cartar RV (1985) Testis size in sandpipers: the fertilization frequency hypothesis. Naturwissenschaften 72:157–158Google Scholar
  2. Coe M (1974) Observations on the ecology and breeding biology of the genus Chiromantis (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae). J Zool (Lond) 172:13–34Google Scholar
  3. Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. McGrawHill, New York St. Louis San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Fukuyama K (1991) Spawning behaviour and male mating tactics of a foam-nesting treefrog, Rhacophorus schlegelii (Rhacophoridae, Amphibia). Anim Behav 42 (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Halliday TR, Verrell PA (1984) Sperm competition in amphibians. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 487–508Google Scholar
  6. Harcourt AH, Harvey PH, Larson SG, Short RV (1981) Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293:55–57Google Scholar
  7. Harvey PH, Harcourt AH (1984) Sperm competition, testes size and breeding systems in primates. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 589–600Google Scholar
  8. Iwasawa H (1954) The mass of urogenital organs of amphibians. Kagaku 25:141 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Iwasawa H (1987) Dissection. In: Urano A, Ishihara K (eds) Biology of toads. Shokabo, Tokyo, pp 239–255 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Kasuya E, Shigehara H, Hirota M (1987) Mating aggregation in the Japanese treefrog, Rhacophorus arboreus (Anura: Rhacophoridae): a test of cooperation hypothesis. Zool Sci 4:693–697Google Scholar
  11. Kato K (1956) Ecological notes on the green frogs during the breeding season. II. Breeding habits and others. Japn J Ecol 6:57–61 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  12. Kenagy GJ, Trombulak SC (1986) Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. J Mammal 67:1–22Google Scholar
  13. Kikuchi H (1988) Ecology and distribution of a frog, Rhacophorus schlegelii (Gunther), in Saitama Prefecture. Bull Saitama Mus Nat Hist 6:45–50 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Lofts B (1974) Reproduction. In: Lofts B (ed) Physiology of the Amphibia, vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp 107–218Google Scholar
  15. Long DR (1987) A comparison of energy substrates and reproductive patterns of two anurans, Acris crepitans and Bufo woodhousei. Comp Biochem Physiol 87A:81–91Google Scholar
  16. Maeda N, Matsui M (1989) Frogs and toads of Japan. Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  17. Okochi I (1979) Rana rugosa. In: Sengoku S (ed) Amphibians/reptiles in color. Ieno-hikari-kyoukai, Tokyo, pp 152–153 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Pyburn WF (1970) Breeding behavior of the leaf-frogs Phyllomedusa callidryas and Phyllomedusa dacnicolor in Mexico. Copeia 1970:209–218Google Scholar
  19. Rastogi RK, Iela L, Delrio G, Bagnara JT (1986) Reproduction in the Mexican leaf frog, Pachymedusa dacnicolor, II. The male. Gen Comp Endocrinol 62:23–35Google Scholar
  20. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  21. Toda M (1989) The life history of Japanse forest frog, Rhacophorus arboreus in the Kanazawa Castle. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamotsu Kusano
    • 1
  • Mitsuhiko Toda
    • 2
  • Kinji Fukuyama
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceTokyo Metropolitan UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Biology and Health ScienceKanazawa UniversityKanazawaJapan
  3. 3.Department of BiologyKeio UniversityKohoku-ku, YokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations