Abstract
The numbers of progeny produced by comparable numbers of female Drosophila melanogaster of 26 geographic strains on nine different culture media are examined in the context of norms of reaction. Having emphasized that diversifying selection is seldom discussed simultaneously with its seemingly related topic, norms of reaction, I present the following argument: diversifying selection has generally been viewed as involving sub-populations inhabiting separate localities and subject to different patterns of selection, norms of reaction as variation whose weighted average determines the relative fitnesses of different genotypes within individual sub-populations. Should environmental challenges frequently involve life or death (including sterility) outcomes, norms of reaction involving components of fitness engender diversifying selection within local populations (demes).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dobzhansky, Th., 1970. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York.
Dobzhansky, Th. & B. Spassky, 1944. Genetics of Natural Populations. XI. Manifestation of genetic variants in Drosophila pseudoobscura in different environments. Genetics 29: 270–290.
Kawecki, T. J. & S. C. Stearns, 1993. The evolution of life histories in spatially heterogeneous environments: Optimal reaction norms revisited. Evol. Ecol. 7: 155–174.
Levene, H., 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Amer. Nat. 87: 331–333.
Mazer, S. J. & L. M. Wolfe, 1992. Planting density influences the expression of genetic variation in seed mass in wild radish (Raphanus sativus L.: Brassicaceae). Amer. Jour. Botany 79: 1185–1193.
Mukai, T., H. Tachida & M. Ichinose, 1980. Selection ofr viability at loci controlling protein polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster is very weak at most. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 4857–4860.
Nevo, E., 1988. Genetic diversity in nature: Patterns and theory. Evol. Biol. 23: 217–246.
Nevo, E., 1991. Evolutionary theory and processes of adaptive speciation in subterranean mole rats, Spalax ehrenbergi super-species, in Israel. Evol. Biol. 25: 1–125.
Perez-Tomé, J. M. & M. A. Toro, 1982. Competition of similar and non-similar genotypes. Nature 299: 153–154.
Schmalhausen, I. I., 1986. Factors of Evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. (Originally published 1949).
Tachida, H. & T. Mukai, 1985. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster XIX Genotype-environment interaction in viability. Genetics 111: 43–55.
Wallace, B., 1968. Topics in Population Genetics. W. W. Norton, New York.
Wallace, B., 1982. Variation in the abilities of different strains of Drosophila melanogaster to utilize diverse carbon sources. Genetics 59: 69–79.
Wallace, B., 1990. Norms of reaction: Do they include molecular events? Persp. Biol. and Med. 33: 323–334.
Woltereck, R., 1909. Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. Leipzig 19: 110–173.
Yamazaki, T., S. Kusakabe, H. Tachida, M. Ichinose, H. Yoshimaru, Y. Matsuo & T. Mukai, 1983. Reexamination of diversifying selection of polymorphic allozyme genes by using population cages in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 5789–5792.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, B. Norms of reaction and diversifying selection. Genetica 92, 139–146 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163763
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163763