Skip to main content
Log in

BOD and COD studies of synthetic and semisynthetic cutting fluids

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is estimated that between 20 400 and 23 850 × 106 1 of spoiled cutting fluids are discarded in the U.S. each year. Most undergo some form of biological waste treatment, yet there is little information regarding the effectiveness of such treatment on these fluids. In this study, sixteen commercially available synthetic and semisynthetic cutting fluid concentrates were tested for their susceptibility to biological degradation. The BOD5S of each compound was determined as an indication of biological oxidation potential. Inocula of both sewage and river origin were used, with statistically identical results. It was found that biological utilization ranged from 0 to 31% of the total oxygen demand, as measured by COD. Studies with triazine and morpholine preservatives showed no relationship between effectiveness of preservation and degradability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous: 1957,Chem. Week October 19, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: 1972,Iron Age Metalworking Internat. 11, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: 1974, Factory. July, 44.

  • Anonymous: 1976,Chem. & Eng. News 26, June 7th, 72.

  • Bennett, E. O.: 1973,ASLE Pub. No. 73AM-4C-EB, 1.

  • Bennett, E. O.: 1974,Lub. Eng.,30, 549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. O.: 1978a,Inter. Biodeterior. Bull. in press.

  • Bennett, E. O.: 1978b,Lub. Eng., in press.

  • Bouveng, H. O., Davisson, G. and Solyom, P.: 1972,Chimie Pure et Applique,28, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elcomb, D. A.: 1971,SMETech. Paper No. MR71-113. 1.

  • Eldridge, E. F. and Purdy, R. W.: 1978,Sewage Works J.,20, 849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. F., Maharajah, R. S., Mendelow, L. M., Ruth, L. and Pivnick, H.: 1957,Appl. Microbiol. 5, 345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, M. B.: 1956,Indust. Eng. Chem.,48, 256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. A.: 1968,Lub. Eng.,24, 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaesemann, M. T.: 1975,Plant Eng., August, 92.

  • Halas, S. J., Keil, C. C. and Shutt, G. J.: 1969,Indust. Water Wastes Eng.,6, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkias, N.: 1974,U. S. P. 3,791, 975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haseltine, T. R.: 1949,Sewage Works J.,21, 859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, C. B. and Jenkins, G. F.: 1952, Proc. 7th Purdue Indust. Waste Conf., 36.

  • Leadbetter, E. R. and Foster, J. W.: 1958,Archiv. fur Microbiol.,30, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, R. L.: 1970,Abrasive Eng.,16, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, Y. and Hagiawara, K.: 1972,Osaka Kogy Gijutsu Shikensho Kiho.,23, 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, W. J.: 1971,SME Tech, Paper No. MR71-114. 1–7.

  • Pierce, G. E. and Clesceri, L. S.: 1975, Nat. Meeting, Amer. Soc. Microbiol., New York.

  • Pivnick, H., Fuller, M., Graham, H. and Uyeno, S.: 1955,Lub. Eng.,11, 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. M. and Peters, M. M.: 1970,J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.,42, 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. D.: 1971,SME Tech. Paper No. MR71-115. 1–11.

  • Sabina, L. R. and Pivnick, H.: 1956,Appl. Microbiol.,4, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismey, B.: 1971,Indust. Lub. Tribol., February, 73.

  • Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: 1975, 14th Ed.,Amer. Pub. Health Assoc., New York.

  • Teeter, F. C., Sheldahl, D. B. and Creech, B. C.: 1971,U. S. P. No. 3, 639, 898.

  • Willoughby, H. E.: 1969,Tribology, November, 221.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, M.C., Gannon, J.E. & Bennett, E.O. BOD and COD studies of synthetic and semisynthetic cutting fluids. Water Air Soil Pollut 11, 105–113 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163523

Keywords

Navigation