Skip to main content
Log in

VCTS chart evaluation as a screening test

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity curves of 211 randomly selected patients were drawn using the VCTS chart. Depending on the type of curve obtained, patients were grouped in different diagnostic categories following the instructions supplied with the chart. Clinical examination revealed that the VCTS chart curves indicated a false diagnosis of cataract in 65.5% patients and in 54.2% patients a false diagnosis of glaucoma. In a number of additional patients, VCTS chart testing had failed to indicate the presence of cataract or glaucoma. Contrary to the claims of the manufacturer our results demonstrate that the VCTS chart has no value as a screening device in a clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown JL. Visual acuity and form discrimination. In: Records RE, ed. Physiology of the human eye and visual system. Hagerstown: Harper and Row Publishers, 1979: 390–418.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmern RL, Campbell FW, Wilkinson IMS. Subtle disturbances of vision after optic neuritis elicited by studying contrast sensitivity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1979; 42: 407–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carney LG, Jacobs RJ. Mechanisms of visual loss in corneal edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1068–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hess R, Woo G. Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17: 1978; 428–35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neima D, Le Blanc R, Regan D. Visual field defects in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1042–45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Reeves BC, Emmerson PG. Detection of optic nerve damage in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69: 897–903.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Clarke DD. Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; 68: 821–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Wolkstein M, Moss A, Podes SM. Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1979; 88: 205–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Regan D, Silver R, Murray TJ. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis - hidden visual loss. An auxilliary diagnostic test. Brain 1977; 100: 563–79.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Regan D, Raymond J, Ginsburg AP, Murray TJ. Contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and the discrimination of Snellen letters in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1981; 104: 333–50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whitlock JA, Murray TJ, Beverley KI. Orientationspecific losses of contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980; 19: 324–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bodis-Wollner I, Camisa JM. Contrast sensitivity measurement in clinical diagnosis: In: Lessel S, Van Dalen JIW ed. Neuro-ophthalmology: A series of critical surveys of the international literature, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1980; 373–401.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ. A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: Preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsburg AP. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optomet Physiol Opt 1984; 61: 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  15. VCTS application manual. VISTECH Consultants, Inc, Dayton, Ohio, U.S.A.

  16. Hess RF, Corney LG. Vision through an abnormal cornea: A pilot study of the relationship between visual loss from corneal distortion, corneal edema, keratoconus, and some allied corneal pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18: 476–83.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carney LG. Visual loss in keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 100: 1282–85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mannis MJ, Zadnik K, Johnson GA. The effect of penetrating keratoplasty on contrast sensitivity in keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1513–16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell FW, Green DG. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965; 1981: 576–93.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mannis MJ. Making sense of contrast sensitivity testing. Has its time come? (Editorial) Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 627–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maudgal, P.C., Stout, R.W.O. & Van Balen, A. VCTS chart evaluation as a screening test. Doc Ophthalmol 69, 399–405 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162752

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162752

Key words

Navigation